国际贸易实务课堂案例.docx
- 文档编号:8864313
- 上传时间:2023-02-02
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:13
- 大小:26.61KB
国际贸易实务课堂案例.docx
《国际贸易实务课堂案例.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《国际贸易实务课堂案例.docx(13页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
国际贸易实务课堂案例
《国际贸易实务》双语课堂案例剖析
Chapter Two and Three
General Procedures of Export and Import Transaction&
Contracts for the International Trade
Case One 案例一
1.Mr. Smith, an American businessman, sold a batch of IBM computers to a Hong Kong
importer, Mr. Chen .The sales was concluded in the United States of America on the terms of CIF
Hong Kong. During execution of the contract, disputes arose between the seller and the buyer on
the form an interpretation of the contract. In such a case, did the law of the USA or the law of
Hong Kong apply to the disputes?
Why?
Case Two 案例二
2.Mr. Anderson intended to sell a plane to Mr. Johnson. In his cable, Mr. Anderson offered:
“Confirm sale of a plane…Please send 5000 pounds by telegraphic transfer.” Mr. Johnson cabled
back immediately:
“Confirm purchase of your plane, terms and conditions same as your cable.
I’ve sent the 5000 pounds to your Account Bank who keeps your money on your behalf until
delivery of the plane. Please confirm delivery within 30 days from the date of this cable.” Mr.
Anderson did not reply and sold the plane to another buyer at a much higher price. Disagreements
occurred between the two parties about whether the contract was concluded effectively. In such a
case, was the contract concluded?
Why?
Case Three 案例三
3. A Chinese export company sent on July 1 an offer to a French trading company ,stipulating for
the reply to reach them before July 10. The French trading company cabled its acceptance of the
offer on July 8. Because of the delay by the post office, the acceptance did not reach the Chinese
company till on the morning of July 11.And before receiving the acceptance, the Chinese
company was informed that the prices of the said products were rising rapidly,the seller refused
the acceptance immediately.
Question:
Was the acceptance effective?
Why?
Case Four 案例四
4. A French buyer visited a Chinese trading company to buy some goods in the morning. When
Chinese seller offered the price, he didn’t say anything. But in the afternoon, the French buyer
visited again and accepted the morning’s offer. At this moment, Chinese company found the price
of this goods on the international market was rising, so how could the Chinese trading company
deal with?
Why?
Case Five 案例五
5. Our company made an offer with Italian buyer, which is valid before 10th of this month.
Because of the post bureau’s late in delivery, we have received the acceptance on 11th. At this
moment, we found the price of these goods on the market was rising, How can we do?
Case Six 案例六
6. Company A made an offer for a farm product to Company B stating:
“Packing in sound bags”.
Within the validity, Company B replied “Refer to your telex first accepted, packing in new
bags”.On receiving the reply, Company A began to purchase the goods for export. Days later, as
market price of the commodity was falling, Company B wrote to Company A “No contract is
entered between us, as you failed to confirm our changing of the packing requirement.” Company
A argued that Company B’s acceptance was effective and the contract was established then.
Question:
1) What is your opinion?
2) Give the reason to support your opinion
3) How to prevent such dispute.
Case Seven 案例七
7. In 1996, a certain export company of China sent a group of businessman to the United States for
purchase of equipment. In New York, both parties reached an oral agreement on such items as
specifications, unit price, and quantity. Upon leaving, the group indicated to the other party that,
when they go back to Beijing, they would draw a contract, which would become effective after
being signed by both parties. After going back to Beijing, the group found that the clients
withdrew their import of the equipment, and thus the contract was not signed and the L/C was not
opened either. The US side urged the Chinese side to perform the contract; otherwise they would
lodge a claim with the Chinese side in the US. Please analyze the case and give an opinion on how
the Chinese export company was to deal with this case and why?
Case Eight 案例八
8. A Chinese export company sent on June 1 an offer to a businessman living in Italy,
stipulating for the reply to reach them before June 10. The Italian businessman cabled
his acceptance of the offer on June 8. Because of the delay by the post office, the
acceptance did not reach the Chinese company till on the morning of June 11. And
before receiving the acceptance, the Chinese company was informed that the prices of
the said products were rising rapidly. What do you think is the best way for the
Chinese company to deal with this case?
Why?
Chapter Two and Three
General Procedures of Export and Import Transaction&
Contracts for the International Trade
Analysis:
案例分析
1 The law of the United States of America applies to this contract because:
(a) this
was a CIF contract; (b) the place of conclusion of the contract was in the USA; (c) the
place of the execution of the contract was also in the USA. The seller completed these
responsibilities after he delivered the goods at the port of the USA.
2. This contract was not concluded effectively. Item 1 of Article 19 of the CISG
indicates, " A reply to an offer which purports to be an acceptance but contains
additions, limitations or other modifications is a rejection to the offer and constitutes a
counter-offer.
In this case, though Mr. Johnson accepted Mr. Anderson's offer, his acceptance
contained some additions to and modifications of the offer; for example, Mr.
Anderson asked for " telegraphic transfer", Mr. Johnson sent the money to the bank to
be kept there. According to Item 3 of Article 19 of the CISG, alteration to the mode of
payment is material one, thus Mr. Johnson might keep silent and reject the acceptance.
3.According to Item 2 of Article 21 of CISG:
“If a letter or other writing containing a
late acceptance shows that it has been sent in such circumstances that if its
transmission had been normal it would have reached the offeror in due time, the late
acceptance is effective as an acceptance unless, without delay, the offeror orally
informs the offeree that he considers his offer as having lapsed or dispatches a notice
to that effect. In this case, in order to avoid unnecessary loss, the Chinese company
should telephone or dispatch immediately a notice informing that the acceptance is
ineffective as it is late.
4.中国与法国均系《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》缔约国,洽谈过程中,双方对《公约》
均未排除或作出任何保留。
因此,双方当事人均应受该《公约》约束。
按《公约》规定:
对口头要约,须立即接受方能成立合同。
据此,我方鉴于市场有趋涨迹象,可以予以拒绝
或提高售价继续洽谈。
5. 中国与意大利均系《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》缔约国,该案双方洽谈过程中,均
未排除或作出任何保留,因此,双方当事人均应受《公约》约束。
我方于 11 日收到意商的
接受电报属因传递延误而造成的逾期接受。
因此,如我方不能同意此项交易,应即复电通
知对方:
我方原发盘已经失效。
如我方鉴于其他原因,愿按原发盘达成交易,订立合同,
可回电确信,也可不予答复,此时接受即告失效。
6. A 公司与 B 公司的第一封信函可视为发盘,在该发盘中 A 公司对包装做出了要求。
而
B 公司对该发盘中包装条款进行了修改,可视为还盘,或新的发盘,B 公司发出还盘后 A
公司未进行回复,虽然它用行动表明受 B 公司发盘约束,但没有明确向 B 公司表示接受,
此时认为合同未成立。
因此,B 公司以此为由,拒不履行合同。
A 公司将陷入被动。
为了避免出现此情况,A 公司在收到 B 公司发盘时,应与时表示接受。
7. According to Article 11 of CISG:
“A contract of sale need not be concluded in, or
evidenced by, writing and is not subject to any other requirement as to form. It may be
proved by any means, including witnesses.” Though China and the US are both
member countries of the CISG, China declared that it won’t be bound by Article 11
and its related articles. That is to say, any kind of contracts in China must be
evidencing by writing. In this case, though both companies agreed orally as to the
main terms of the sales contract, there is no writing evidencing the contract. This
contract, according to Chinese law, is not effective.
8. According to Item 2 of Article 21 of CISG:
“If a letter or other writing containing a
late acceptance shows that it has been sent in such circumstances that if its
transmission had been normal it would have reached the offeror in due time, the late
acceptance is effective as an acceptance unless, without delay, the offeror orally
informs the offeree that he considers his offer as having lapsed or dispatches a notice
to that effect. In this case, in order to avoid unnecessary loss, the Chinese company
should telephone or dispatch immediately a notice informing that the acceptance is
ineffective as it is late.
Chapter FourTrade Term
Case One 案例一
1. A Chinese import and export company concluded a Sale Contract with a Holland firm on
August 5, 2000, selling a batch of certain commodity. The contract was based on CIF Rotterdam
at USD 2500 per metric ton. The Chinese company delivered the goods in compliance with the
contract and obtained a clean on board Bill of Lading. During transportation, however, 100 metric
tons of goods got lost because of rough sea. Upon arrival of the good, the price of the contracted
goods went down quickly. The buyer refused to take delivery of the goods and effect payment and
claimed damages from the seller. How would you deal with the case?
Case Two 案例二
2. A Chinese trading company E concluded a transaction in steel with a Hong Kong company W
on the basis of FOB China Port. Company W immediately resold the steel to Company H in Libya
on the terms of CFR Liberia. The L/C form W required the price term to be FOB China Port and
the goods to be directly delivered to Liberia. The L/C also required “Freight Prepaid” to be
indicated on Bill of Lading. Why did Company W perform so?
What should we do about it?
Case Three 案例三
3. A Chinese import and export company concluded a Sale Contract with a German firm on
October 5, 2006, selling a batch of certain commodity. The contract was based on CIF Hamburg at
USD 2500 per metric
ton; The Chinese company delivered the goods in compliance with the contract and obtained a
clean on board B/L. During transportation, however, 100 metric tons of the goods got lost because
of rough sea. Upon arrival of the goods, the price of the contracted goods went down quickly. The
buyer refused to take delivery of the goods and e
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 国际贸易 实务 课堂 案例