文化外交与文化帝国主义 英文版.docx
- 文档编号:8662099
- 上传时间:2023-02-01
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:6
- 大小:21.22KB
文化外交与文化帝国主义 英文版.docx
《文化外交与文化帝国主义 英文版.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《文化外交与文化帝国主义 英文版.docx(6页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
文化外交与文化帝国主义英文版
Critically evaluate the major debates surrounding the conduct of cultural diplomacy, as distinct from cultural imperialism
ChapterIIntroduction
Culturaldiplomacyreferstothediplomacycarriedoutforthecontentofculturaltransmission,exchangeandcommunication,itisadiplomaticactivitywhichasovereignstateusestoachievecertainpoliticalgoalsorexternalstrategicintentthroughmakinguseofculturalmeans.Lookingatthedevelopmentandevolutionofthewayofinternationaldiplomacyinrecentyears,itcanbeseenthatmoreandmorecountriesintheworldhavepaidattentiontotheuseofthemeansofculturaldiplomacytoachievetheirexternalstrategy.Underthethemeofpeaceanddevelopment,theroleofculturaldiplomacyisincreasinglyobviousinacountry’sachievementofitsinternationalstrategicobjectives.Comparedwithtraditionaleconomicdiplomacy,militarydiplomacyandpoliticaldiplomacy,ithasmoreflexiblefeatures.Beforetheendofthecoldwar,culturaldiplomacyisalmostasynonymforculturalimperialism,butwiththedevelopmentofmediatechnologysincethecoldwar,themodeoftransmission,impactandconsequencesofculturaldiplomacyhavetakenplacetremendouschanges,thenwhetherculturaldiplomacyistantamounttoculturalimperialists,manyscholarshavegivendifferentanswerstothis.Thisarticlewillcriticallyevaluatethemajordebatessurroundingtheconductofculturaldiplomacyfromtheperspectiveofmedia.
ChapterIIDebatesonculturalimperialismandculturaldiplomacy
2.1Thedefinitionandcharacteristicsofculturalimperialism
Westerncountriestakeadvantageoftheirstrongpolitical,economicandculturalstrengthtotakeleadingpositionsinculturalcommunicationandgrasptherulesofthegameininternationalexchanges.Inculturalexchanges,theytrytoturntheirownvaluesorideologyintotheworld'suniversalvalues,hopingthattheirownculturaltraditionswouldbecometheworld’sculturaltraditions.Thus,inculturalexchanges,theyvigorouslyimplementtheculturalstrategyofculturalimperialismandareinabidtousethisnewpotentialapproachofculturaldiplomacytoachievethegoalofcontrollingtheworld.TheU.S.internationalpoliticalscientistHansJ.Morgenthau(1978)pointedoutthatthepolicyofculturalimperialismisthemostdelicate,ifithadsucceededindividually,thenthisisthemostsuccessfulpolicyofimperialism.Itspurposeisnottoconquerterritoryandcontrolovereconomiclife,buttoconquertheheartsofpeople’sanduseitasameanstochangethepowerrelationsbetweenthetwocountries......ifculturalimperialismcanachievesuchacompletevictory,whichwouldmakeothermethodsofimperialismredundant.Andthelawpresentedbyculturaldevelopmentandexchangehasalsocontributedtothepromotionofculturalimperialism.Inculturalexchanges,Theflowdirectionofaculturaloftentakestheformofflowingfromacountrywithacultureofstrongradiationforcetoacountrywithacultureofweakradiationforce.Thus,duetotheirweakpositionoftheoverallstrengthinpolitical,economicandotheraspects,developingcountriesareofteninpassivepositionsinculturalexchanges,whichmakesthewesterncountries’implementationofculturalimperialismindevelopingcountriespossible.Culturalimperialismhasthefollowingthreebasiccharacteristics:
intermsofform,itismainlythroughthemassmedia;intermsofthecontent,itmainlypromotespost-modernculture;itmakesuseoftheformofcommunicationtoimplementculturalimperialism.Thesethreebasiccharacteristicsarealsoconsistentwiththedefinitionwhichaconsiderablenumberofpeoplecurrentlyhavedefinedforecessivecolonialism.Andscholarswhoupholdtheperspectiveofculturalimperialismgenerallybelievethattheso-called‘freeflowofinformation’whichadvocatedbytheUS-ledwesterncountrieshasresultedintheseriousunbalanceoftheworld'sinformationproductionandcirculationstructure.Itisreflectedinthefollowingaspects:
first,theimbalanceininformationproduction,namely,theimbalancesofnumberofmediaandmediapower.Second,theimbalanceofinformationflow,thatis,themonopolyofinternationalnews,theone-waycommunicationofpopularcultureandtheimbalanceofdisseminationofcross-borderinformation.Third,theunevendistributionofcontent,ontheonehand,westernmediatransmitalotofwesternvaluesandwayoflifetodevelopingcountries,ontheotherhand,theyalwaysignoredevelopingcountries’economicandsocialdevelopmentandarekeenonreportingdevelopingcountries’scourgeofcrimeandtheharshenvironment,suchassocialunrestandothercontent,distortingandevenvilifyingthedevelopingcountry'simage.Fourth,theimbalanceofresourceutilization,developedcountriesmakeuseoftheireconomicandtechnicaladvantagestofirstleaduptheinternationalpublicresources,whichmakescountriesofthethirdworldencountergreatdifficultiesinthedevelopmentofsatellitetransmission,whichcanbeseenbythebattlefortheinternationalwaveresources.
2.2Thedeclineofculturalimperialism
In1960s,theword‘imperialism’isenoughtodescribethecharacteristicsofthetimes,butnow,'globalization'hasreplacedit.Thisinterpretationindicatesthattoexploreculturalimperialismdeepintothe‘cultureofglobalization’wouldbemorerealisticthantostudyitfromaperspectiveoftheideologicalconfrontation.
Foralongtime,culturalhegemonyhasbeenequatedwithculturalimperialismbypeople.Mostcountriesaroundtheworldcanreceivenews,entertainmentandsportsnewsinEnglishthroughsatellitebroadcast.Itseemsthatalmostalltheworld'sTVsarebroadcastingwiththesameTVshows,eventhoughthecontentisdifferent,therulesofnarrativeisalsoidentical,sincetheyallcomefromNewYork,HollywoodandLondon.SomepeopleworrythatthepopularityofEnglish-languagebroadcastsmakesusincreasinglyclosertotakingEnglishastheonlycommonlanguageofbusiness,research,scienceandentertainment.ManypeoplebelievethattheprevalenceofEnglishposesathreattomanyothercultures.Forexample,thereareapproximately80%oftheelectronicinformationintheworldiswritteninEnglish.English-speakingpeoplearelessthanhalfofInternetusers,however,EnglishisthemainlanguageoftheInternet.U.S.programsmaystronglyadvocatetheideologyofindividualism,andtheywilldestroythetraditionalfamilyvaluessuchasrespectingandloving.Althoughthereissufficientevidencewhichhasprovedthattheglobalizationofwesternmediaproductshascreatedafar-reachingimpactontheculturesoutsideofEnglandandAmerican,whilethereisatrendthatmediacontenttendstodevelopingtowardthedirectionofregionalizationandlocalization,thedevelopmentofculturalisomorphismofglobalizationandregionalizationhasalsocausedpeople’sgrowingconcern.Internationalmediaorganizationsareincreasinglyawareofthediversetasteofotherusers’indifferentpartsoftheworld.Astheycurrentlyoperateintheglobalmarketplacetoadjusttheirproductsandservicestomakethemsuittolocalculturalconditions,whichisimperativeinthecommercialsense.Althoughwhichhasaffectedthemismainlythemarketpowerratherthanaspecialrespectfornationalculture,theglobalmediaconglomerateclearlytendstouselocalculturalresourcestopromotetheirproducts.Somescholarslookontheregionalizationofculturalproductsasalogoofculturalconvergencefrom‘theglobaltothelocal’.Theglobal-localculturalinteractionisleadingtotheformationofamixedculture,itisconsideredtobeblurringtheboundariesbetweenthemodernandthetraditional,thehighandthelow,nationalcultureandglobalculture.Robertsoncalledthisphenomenon‘globallocalization’.Takinginter-culturalintegrationasthefeatures,thisintegrationistheresultoftheuseofnewcommunicationtechnologiestotransformthewesternmediatoadapttothelocallanguage,customsandculturalpractices.
Culturalidentityisnotfixed,itisconstantlychanging.AsStuartHall(1991)said,globalizationhasbroughtsomeimpactonculturalidentity.Culturalcharacteristicshasitssourcesandhistory.However,likeallthehistoricthings,theyareevolvingallthetime.Theycertainlydonotalwaysbelongtoashortperiodoftimeinthepast,butconstantlybeingaffectedbyhistory,cultureandpower.Intheeraofglobalizationwhenthemassmediaintegrateswithahighdegree,whenmediafuelsculturalconflict,italsobuilttheculturalstructureindifferentregionsaswell.Avarietyofsoundsinaworldenablesthevillagersoftheglobalvillageenjoyunprecedentedglobalculturalelements.Whensomebodysaidthatthemedia,culturalproductsseemtocomingfromdevelopedcountries,itcannotbeforgottenthatthedevelopedcountriesthemselvesarealsoa‘meltingpot’.Culturesaroundtheworldcometogether,whichcannotbeinterpretedthroughtheprevious,simple‘culturalimperialism’.Tostudytheglobalculturalconflictandaggregationinabroaderperspectiveisundoubtedlymoremeaningfulthanthesticktoculturalimperialism(DonaldM.Snow.,2006).
ChapterIIIFromthetechnologydevelopmentofthemediatoanalyzethedifferencesbetweenculturalimperialismandculturaldiplomacy
McLuhan(1968)hadafamoussaying:
themediumisthemessage,thatistosay,whatcontentshavebeendisseminatedbythemediaisnotimportant,theimportantisthatthemediaitselfexistsasamessagesymbol.Indeed,tosomeextent,themediaareasymbolofsocialdevelopment,astheprimitivetribeisnotlikelytoemergeinanewspaper,in
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 文化外交与文化帝国主义 英文版 文化 外交 帝国主义 英文
![提示](https://static.bdocx.com/images/bang_tan.gif)