SCI论文全攻略之审稿回复实例.docx
- 文档编号:8585727
- 上传时间:2023-01-31
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:11
- 大小:25.91KB
SCI论文全攻略之审稿回复实例.docx
《SCI论文全攻略之审稿回复实例.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《SCI论文全攻略之审稿回复实例.docx(11页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
SCI论文全攻略之审稿回复实例
SCI论文全攻略之审稿回复实例.txt精神失常的疯子不可怕,可怕的是精神正常的疯子!
附1:
SCI扩展版和SCI核心版收录期刊的区别
SCI扩展版(以下简称SCIE)和SCI核心版(以下简称SCI)收录期刊还是有区别的,SCI期刊论文全部被SCI收录,SCIE期刊论文只是部分被SCI收录,这就是有的SCIE期刊一年有几百篇论文,却只有几十篇甚至十几篇论文被SCI收录的原因。
具体到SCIE期刊上的一篇论文能否被SCI收录,还是要看美国ISI发布的报告,现在科技部信息研究所也公布这一报告,很多图书馆的SCI检索机构也可以查。
不过在国内,很多单位都把SCI期刊论文和SCIE期刊论文一视同仁,只要发表在SCI期刊或SCIE期刊上,该论文都当作SCI收录,这是管理者的无能抑或无为就不得而知了。
但就我们单位而言(国内TOP10高校),这两者还是区别对待的,论文是否SCI收录还是看CISI的报告或SCI检索机构的证
附2:
[精华]如何回复SCI投稿审稿人意见
(1)
1.所有问题必须逐条回答。
2.尽量满足意见中需要补充的实验。
3.满足不了的也不要回避,说明不能做的合理理由。
4.审稿人推荐的文献一定要引用,并讨论透彻。
以下是本人对审稿人意见的回复一例,仅供参考。
续两点经验:
1,最重要的是逐条回答,即使你答不了,也要老实交代;不要太狡猾,以至于耽误事;
2,绝大部分实验是不要真追加的,除非你受到启发,而想该投另外高档杂志----因为你既然已经写成文章,从逻辑上肯定是一个完整的“story”了。
以上指国际杂志修稿。
国内杂志太多,以至于稿源吃紧,基本没有退稿,所以你怎么修都是接受。
我的文章水平都不高,主要是没有明显的创新性,也很苦恼。
但是除了开始几篇投在国内杂志外,其他都在国际杂志(也都是SCI)发表。
以我了解的情况,我单位其他同志给国内杂志投稿,退稿的极少,只有一次被《某某科学进展》拒绝。
究其原因,除了我上面说的,另外可能是我单位写稿子还是比较严肃,导师把关也比较严的缘故。
自我感觉总结(不一定对):
1)国内杂志审稿极慢(少数除外),但现在也有加快趋势;
2)国内杂志编辑人员认真负责的人不多,稿子寄去后,少则几个月,多则一年多没有任何消息;
3)国内杂志要求修改的稿子,如果你自己不修,他最后也给你发;
4)国外杂志要求补充实验的,我均以解释而过关,原因见少帖)。
还因为:
很少杂志编辑把你的修改稿再寄给当初审稿人的,除非审稿人特别请求。
编辑不一定懂你的东西,他只是看到你认真修改,回答疑问了,也就接受了(当然高档杂志可能不是这样,我的经验只限定一般杂志(影响因子1-5)。
欢迎大家批评指正。
我常用的回复格式,呵呵。
Dearreviewer:
Iamverygratefultoyourcommentsforthemanuscript.Accordingwithyouradvice,weamendedtherelevantpartinmanuscript.Someofyourquestionswereansweredbelow.
1)
2)
....
引用审稿人推荐的文献的确是很重要的,要想办法和自己的文章有机地结合起来。
至于实验大部分都可以不用补做,关键是你要让审稿人明白你的文章的重点是什么,这个实验对你要强调的重点内容不是很必要,或者你现在所用的方法已经可以达到目的就行了。
最后要注意,审稿人也会犯错误,不仅仅是笔误也有专业知识上的错误,因为编辑找的审稿人未必是你这个领域的专家。
只要自己是正确的就要坚持。
在回复中委婉地表达一下你的意见,不过要注意商讨语气哦!
我得回复格式是这样的:
DearProfessorxx:
Thankyouverymuchforyourletterdatedxxxxxxxxx,andthereferees’reports.Basedonyourcommentandrequest,wehavemadeextensivemodificationontheoriginalmanuscript.Here,weattachedrevisedmanuscript.intheformatsofbothPDFandMSword,foryourapproval.Adocumentansweringeveryquestionfromtherefereeswasalsosummarizedandenclosed.Arevisedmanuscript.withthecorrectionsectionsredmarkedwasattachedasthesupplementalmaterialandforeasycheck/editingpurpose.Shouldyouhaveanyquestions,pleasecontactuswithouthesitate.
然后再附上Q/A,基本上嘱条回答,写的越多越好(老师语)。
结果修改一次就接收了:
)
我的回复,请老外帮忙修改了
DearEditor:
Thankyouforyourkindletterof“......”onNovember**,2005.Werevisedthemanuscript.inaccordancewiththereviewers’comments,andcarefullyproof-readthemanuscript.tominimizetypographical,grammatical,andbibliographicalerrors.Herebelowisourdescriptiononrevisionaccordingtothereviewers’comments.PartA(Reviewer1).Thereviewer’scomment:
......
Theauthors’Answer:
.....
2.Thereviewer’scomment:
......
Theauthors’Answer:
.....
...
...
PartB(Reviewer2)
1.Thereviewer’scomment:
......
Theauthors’Answer:
.....
2.Thereviewer’scomment:
......
Theauthors’Answer:
.....
...
...
Manygrammaticalortypographicalerrorshavebeenrevised.Allthelinesandpagesindicatedaboveareintherevisedmanuscript.
Thankyouandallthereviewersforthekindadvice.
Sincerelyyours,
***
[精华]如何回复SCI投稿审稿人意见
(2)
一个回复的例子(已接收)
Majorcomments:
1.TheauthorsneedtostrengthentheirresultsbyincludingMMPsecretion,andtran-matrigelmigrationbyapositivecontrolprogenitorcellpopulationi.e.enrichedhumanCD34cellsobtainedfrommobilizedPBL,sincethisisamoreclinicallyrelevantsourceofCD34cellswhichhasalsobeenshowntosecretebothMMP-9andMMP-2(ref.11).CD34enrichedcellsfromsteadystateperipheralbloodwhichalsosecreteMMPsarealsoofinterest.
2.Infig1CpleasespecifywhichcelllinerepresentsMMP-negativecells.Thisneedstobeclarified,aswellasabetterexplanationofthemethodoftheprotocol.
3.TheELISAresultsarerepresentedas"foldincrease"comparedtocontrol.Instead,wesuggestthatstandardsshouldbeusedandresultsshouldbepresentedasabsoluteconcentrationsandonlythencantheseresultsbecomparedtothoseofthezymography.
4.Whendiscussingtheresults,theauthorsshoulddistinguishclearlybetweenspontaneousmigrationvschemotacticmigration.Furthermore,thehighspontaneousmigrationobtainedwithcordbloodCD34cellsshouldbecomparedtomobilizedPBLCD34enrichedcellsanddiscussed.
5.TheauthorsclaimthattheclonogenicassaywasperformedtodeterminetheoptimumconcentrationforinhibitionofMMPactivitybyphenanthrolineandantiMMP-9mAb,howevertheyshouldclarifythatthisassaycanonlydeterminethetoxicityoftheinhibitorsandnottheiroptimalinhibitoryconcentrations.
Minorcomments:
1.Therearemanyspellingandsyntaxerrors,especiallyintheresultsanddiscussion,whichneedcorrection.
a.Ofspecialimportance,isthepercentinhibitionofmigration,whichisdescribedaspercentofmigration.i.e.pg7:
"MigrationofCBCD34wasreducedto73.3%?
"Insteadshouldread"MigrationofCBCD34wasreducedby73.3%?
"
b.ThedegreesymbolneedstobeaddedtothenumbersinMaterialsandmethods.
2.Itwouldbepreferabletocombinefigure1AandB,inordertoconfirmthereliabilityoffig.1Bbyapositivecontrol(HT1080).
Answertoreferee1comment:
1.MobilizedperipheralbloodisamoreclinicalsourceofCD34+cells,soitisnecessarytocomparetheMMP-9secretionandtrans-migrationabilityofCBCD34+cellswiththatofmobilizedPBCD34+cells.However,wecouldn'tobtainenoughmobilizedPBtoseparatePBCD34+cellsanddeterminetheMMP-9secretionandmigrationability,sowecouldn’tcomplementthestudyonPBCD34+cellsinthispaper.ResultsobtainedbyJanowska-WieczoreketalfoundthatmobilizedCD34+cellsinperipheralbloodexpressMMP-9.Furthermore,Domenech’sstudyshowedthatMMP-9secretionisinvolvedinG-CSFinducedHPCmobilization.Theirconclusionshavebeenaddedinthediscussion.Inourpresentstudy,ourcentralconclusionfromourdataisthatfreshlyisolatedCD34+stem/progenitorcellsobtainedfromCBproduceMMP-9.
2.MMP-9negativecellusedinfig1CwasJurkatcell.Inzymographicanalysis,MMP-9wasnotdetectedinthemediumconditionedbyJurkatcell.ToexcludethatthecontaminatingcellsmayplayaroleintheobservedMMP-9production,wescreenedthemediaconditionedbydifferentproportionofCBmononuclearcellswithMMP-9negativecellsbyzymography.Thisresultmaybeconfusion.Actually,onlybydetectingthemediumconditionedby2X105CBmononuclearcells(MNC)/ml(sincethepuritiesofCD34+cellaremorethan90%),itcouldexcludetheMNCrole.Intherevisedmanuscript,weonlydetectedMMP-9activityandantigenlevelinthemediumconditionedby2X105CBmononuclearcells(MNC)/ml.ThereisnoMMP-9secretionbedetectedinthemediumconditionedby2X105CBMNC/ml.ItexcludedthepossibilitythattheMMP-9activityinCBCD34+cellsconditionedmediumisduetothecontaminationbyMNC.
3.Inthisrevisedpaper,wehavedetectedtheMMP-9antigenlevelsbyusingcommercialspecificELISAkits(R&DSystem,sensitivity,0.156ng/ml).RecombinantMMP-9fromR&DSystemwasusedasastandard.Theresultsareexpressedintheabsoluteconcentration.Theabsoluteconcentrationresulthasbeenaddedinthepaper.AsshowninFig2,MMP-9levelsweredetectableinbothCBCD34+cellconditionedmediumandBMCD34+cellconditionedmedium.However,MMP-9levelwassignificantlyhigherinCBCD34+cellconditionedmediumthaninBMCD34+cellconditionedmedium(0.406±0.133ng/mlversus0.195±0.023ng/ml).AlthoughgelatinolyticactivitywasnotdetectedinmediaconditionedbyCD34+cellsfromBM,sensitivityofELISAfavorsthedetectionofMMP-9antigenintheBMCD34+.
4.Inourstudy,toestablishthedirectlinkbetweenMMP-9andCBCD34+cellsmigration,weonlydeterminedtheroleofMMP-9inspontaneousmigrationofCBCD34+cells,butnotinchemotacticmigration.Actually,regulationofhematopoieticstemcellmigration,homingandanchorageofrepopulationcellstothebonemarrowinvolvesacomplexinterplaybetweenadhesionmolecules,chemokines,cytokinesandproteolyticenzymes.ResultsobtainedbythegroupsofVoermansrevealthatnotonlythespontaneousmigrationbutalsotheSDF-1inducedmigrationofCBCD34+cellsisgreatlyincreasedincomparisontoCD34+cellsfromBMandperipheralblood.
5.CD34+cellsweobtainedineachcordbloodsamplewereverylimited.Itisnotenoughtoscreentheinhibitorsconcentrationstoselecttheoptimalinhibitoryconcentrations.Intheblockingexperiments,basedontheconcentrationsusedbyothersandthemanufacturer'srecommendation,wethendeterminedtheinhibitorsconcentrationsbyexcludingthetoxicityoftheinhibitorsinthatconcentration,whichwasdeterminedbyclonogenicassay.
Minorcomments:
1.Thespellingandsyntaxerrorshavebeencheckedandcorrected.
2.Sincetheresultsinfigure1AandBwereobtainedfromtwoseparatedandparallelexperiments,itisnotfitnesstocombinetwofigures.
这是我的一篇修稿回复,杂志是JBMR-A,影响因子3.652,已发表,供参考!
ReplytothecommentsonJBMR-A-05-0172
Comment:
Reference#10ismissingfromtheIntroductionbutusedmuchlaterinthemanuscript.Shouldthesebeinorderusedinmanuscript?
Reply:
Themissingreferencehasbeenaddedintotherevisedmanuscript.
Comment(continued):
Whatisthesamplesizeforalltestsperformed?
Reply:
ThesamplesizefordrugreleaseandPCLdegradationtestswas3.0×3.0cm2,withathicknessofabout0.1mmandaweightofabout40mg.Thisdadahavebeenaddedintotherevisedmanuscript.
Comment(continued):
Figure7.ThereisnoscientificevidencepresentedintheTEMfiguretoconvincethisreviewerofsub-jets.ThisstatementonPage9cannotbemadewithoutclearevidenceduringthejetformation/separation.Figure7isjustalargefiberandsmallfiberfusedtogether,nootherconclusionthanthiscanbemade.
Reply:
Ne
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- SCI 论文 攻略 审稿 回复 实例