专八1991历年作文真题及范文汇总tem8 writng.docx

专八1991历年作文真题及范文汇总tem8 writng.docx

《专八1991历年作文真题及范文汇总tem8 writng.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《专八1991历年作文真题及范文汇总tem8 writng.docx（18页珍藏版）》请在冰豆网上搜索。

专八1991历年作文真题及范文汇总tem8writng

1991–2012（TEM8WRITNG）历年英语专业八级作文真题及范文汇总

2012—WRITING:

Arecentsurveyof2,000collegestudentsaskedabouttheirattitudestowardsphonecallsandtext-messaging（alsoknownasShortMessageService）andfoundthestudents’maingoalwastopassalonginformationinaslittletime,withaslittlesmalltalk,aspossible.“Whattheylikemostabouttheirmobiledevicesisthattheycanreachotherpeople,”saysNaomiBaron,aprofessoroflinguisticsatAmericanUniversityinWashington,D.C.,whoconductedthesurvey.“Whattheylikeleastisthatotherpeoplecanreachthem.”HowfardoyouagreewithProfessorBaron?

（400words）

Onepossibleversion:

Bewareourfavoritetelephone

Doyoulikephones?

Whencollegestudentsareaskedthisquestion,andIsupposewhattheywillanswer.Therecentsurveyaboutcollegestudent’sattitudetowardphonesarousedmyinterest.Aresultthatwhatcollegestudentslikephonemostisthattheycanreachothersandwhattheylikeleastisthatotherscanreachthemisgivenbyaprofessor.Iampartiallyagreewiththeprofessor’sopinionasacollegestudentsandamemberamongthebeensurveygroup,whatIlikephonemostisthatIcanreachothersandwhatIlikeleastisnototherscanreachmebutitbringsmepotentialproblems.

Inmodernsociety,Ican’tgetbywithoutmycellphoneandIviewitasanecessarytooltoreachothers.Tobeginwith,IcametocollegeandIamawayfrommyfamilies.Cellphonesallowparentalcommunicationwhichcanmakemefeelmoresecure.Besides,evenifthecrimeratesarelow,asastudentImayfindmyselfinsituationswhereIfeelunsafe.PhonesallowmetoallforhelpwhenIfeelunsafe.CellphonesallowmetocallforhelpwhenIfeelIneedanescort.Inarealemergency,whereIneedmedicalattention,acellphonecouldprovelifesaving,anditbringsmeasafe.what’smoretelephonesallowmetohaveanalways–onconnectiontomysocialnetwork.Icanuseshorttimeandfewwordstoreachothersatanytime.Ilikephoneswhichreallybringmegreatconvenience.

However,forme,whatIlikephoneleastisthatitbringsmepotentialproblems.Iwastelotsoftimeonmobilephones,obsessingwiththeQQzone,wrappinginthegames,chattingwithothersandsoon.Thesearethevisibleeffects.Ithinkothersalsohavethisproblem.What’sworse,phonebringsindifferenceanddistancebetweenus,andthisinvisibleeffectismoreawful.whenmyfriendsandIhavenophones,wegettogetherplayingandtalking,butnowwetalkinglittlewhenwegettogether.Everyonehasasmallscreen,andwepreferengraininginthevirtualworldratherthancommunicatingwithourfriendssittingbesideus.Agroupofpeoplesittogetherandplaywithoutcommunication.Howawfulthatwas.Itistelephonethatreducingourcommunicationandbringingagapbetweenus.Ifoundthetelephoneistherealsubtlepoisonwhichisdestroyingpeople’srelationship.butfewofushasrealizedthis.Mostofusjustseeit’sadvantagesandcollegestudentsareaddictedintoit.

Bewareourfavoritephonewhichisdestroyingourrelationship.Ascollegestudentsweneedrealizingthisandusingourphoneproperly.

2011—WRITING:

Accordingtoarecentnewspaperreport,manyfamoussitesofhistoricalinterestinChinahavebegunorareconsideringchargingtouristshigherentryfeesduringpeaktravelseasons.Thishasarousedalotofpublicattentionandalsopublicdebate.Whatisyouropinion?

ShouldfamousChinesesitesofhistoricalinterestchargehigherfeesduringpeaktravelseasons?

（400words）

Onepossibleversion:

Higherentryfeesshouldbechargedduringpeaktravelseason

Withsocialandeconomicdevelopment,ourpeoplehavemoretimeandmoneytovisitfamoussitesofhistoricalinterest.Theirvisits,ontheonehand,canenrichtheirownlifeandmeanwhilebringthesitessubstantialincomes.Ontheotherhand,toomanyvisits,especiallyduringpeaktravelpeakwhentherearemorevisitors,havecausedhugeproblems.Onesolutiontothisistochargehigherfeesduringpeaktravelseasons,whichIthinkisnecessaryandIamincompletefavorofthisdecision.

Asweallknow,todaythereisnoentrancefeechargedformanyparksinourcountrywhilealmostallfamoussitesofhistoricalintereststillneedanentryfee.Somepeoplecannotacceptthisfortheythinkthatbothparksandfamoussitesofhistoricalinterestarepartofpublicservices.Theyshouldhavefreeaccesstothemoratleastshouldn’tpaytoomuchforthevisitsincetheyhavealreadypaidtaxestothegovernment.Thenitisfarimpossibleforthosepeopletoallowthesitestochargehigherfeesduringpeaktravelseasons. 

Onthesurface,theargumentsthatpeopleopposingtoentryfeeschargedforfamoussitesofhistoricalinterestholdseemreasonable.Butinfact,thosepeoplehaveignoredtheuniquefeaturesoffamoussitesofhistoricalinterestwhichnormallyimplyamplehistoricalandculturalvalues.Thosesitesdifferfromcommonparks.Therelicsinthesesitesarepreciousandfragiletodestroy,andusuallyneedspecialandprofessionalpreservationandadministration,whichturnouttobeanexpensiveexercisethatconstantlydemandsresources.Entryfeesmustbecharged.Duringpeaktravelseasons,thereisnobettermeasurethanraisingtheentryfeestoreducethenumberoftourists.Thepurposeofcharginghigherfeesistostopsomepeople’visitssoastobetterprotectthevaluablerelicsandatthesametimeensurethesafetyofthetourists.Itisobviousthatsomepeoplewillgiveuptheirvisitsconsideringthehigherfees.Hereeconomicmeansareappliedtoconservepreciousthingsatthesitesofhistoricalinterestinanappropriateandsustainableway.

Inaword,duetotheuniquefeaturesofrelicsandtheneedofthesustainableprotectionofsitesofhistoricalinterest,wemustcontrolthenumberofvisitors,especiallyduringthepeaktravelseasonswhentherearetoomanytourists,todiminishtheimpactofhumanactivitiesonthesesitestoitslowestlevel.Andcharginghigherfeesduringthepeaktravelseasons,aneffectiveeconomicmeansofregulationwillbeofgreatimportance.

2010—WRITING:

Recentlynewspapershavereportedthatofficialsinalittle-knownmountainousareanearGuiyang,GuizhouProvincewantedtoturntheareaintoa"centralbusinessdistrict"forGuiyangandinvitedaforeigndesigncompanytogiveitanentirelynewlook.Thedesigncompanycameupwithablueprintforunconventional,super-futuristicbuildings.Thistriggeredoffdifferentresponses.Someappreciatedtheboldinnovationofthedesign,butothersheldthatitfailedtoreflectregionalcharacteristicsorlocalculturalheritage.Whatisyourviewonthis?

（400words）

Onepossibleversion:

Maybe We Have a Better Idea

FewthingscanaddasmuchcolorstotheregionalfeaturesofacityasthelookofitsCBD.Hence,weknowManhattanofBigApple,PudongofShanghai.Indeed,theyarethemosttypicalsightsprojectingaskylineofamoderncity.However,shouldaCBDintheworldlookalllike?

Whotoldusitshouldsolelybemadeupofunconventional,super-futuristicbuildings?

Andshouldtheystandoutfromtheirsurroundings?

AnswerstothesequestionsareuniversallyandunequivocallyNo.

ACBDisnotadetachedbutintegralpartofacity.Topreventitfrombeingtooextremeormonstrous,itsupposedlygoeswiththegeneralstyleoftherestpartsofthecity.Inthepast,weChinesehavelearntsomanyhardandpainfullessons.WecouldhavehadaBeijingwithmoreChinesetraditionalcharacteristics,morevaluableculturalheritagepreservedandaboveallmoreintegralandharmoniousTianAn-menSquaretopresenttotheworld.Ifourgrandfathershadbeenmorewillingtolistentotheadviceofsomepersonages,mankindcouldhaveknownanotherParisofatotallydifferentstyleintheworld.

Secondly,withmoreandmoremortalsbeingawareofthevalueofeco-friendliness,thoseunconventional,super-futuristicbuildingsmadeespeciallyofsteel,concretestructuresandothereco-unfriendlymaterialsarebeingincreasinglyquestioned,suspectedandforsaken.AChinasoutherncitylikeGYshould,perhaps,modelitsCBDonthatofDavosratherthanNewYorkorShanghai.Insteadoferectingskyscrapersandtowers,GYoughttomakeitsCBDdelicateandpleasing,offeringbankersandbusinessmenfromacrosstheworldcomfortableandcozyoffices.

Finally,atrendthathascaughtonsincesometimeagoisthatregionalisinternational.Theworldisworldnowherebecauseofitsunityandsamenessbutbecauseofitsdiversityandvariety.Toaddherownmeasureofcolorstotheworld,CBDinGYshouldbelocal,regionalandreflectingthedistinctivefeaturesofthecity.Justalookwouldgiveonefamiliarwithheranintimacy“That’sGYallover!

”ThedaywhensuchaCBDiscompleted,shecanbearesortofanothersortrivetingpeopleallovertheworlddoingbusinessintheareawhileenjoyingherbeautyandwarmcomfort.

Therefore,themunicipalandcity-developersoughttogiveitaseriousthoughtbeforeturningwhateverforeigndesigncompany’sblueprinttoconcreteandsteel.Maybewecancomeupwithabetteridea–anewtypeofCBD,eco-friendly,amiableandeconomical,mightsetanewprecedent!

2009—WRITING:

Mandarin,orputonghua,isthestandardservicesectorlanguageinourcountry.Butrecently,employeesatabigcity'ssubwaystationhavebeenbusylearningdialectsofotherpartsofthecountry.Proponentssaythatusingdialectsinthesubwayisawaytoprovidebetterservice.Butopponentsthinkthatencouragingtheuseofdialectsinpubliccountersthenationalpolicytopromoteputonghua.Whatisyouropinion?

AreDialectsJustasA