企业资源计划ERP外文文献翻译译文3200字.docx
- 文档编号:6333275
- 上传时间:2023-01-05
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:8
- 大小:25.08KB
企业资源计划ERP外文文献翻译译文3200字.docx
《企业资源计划ERP外文文献翻译译文3200字.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《企业资源计划ERP外文文献翻译译文3200字.docx(8页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
企业资源计划ERP外文文献翻译译文3200字
文献出处:
Han, S. W. "ERP—Enterprise Resource Planning:
A cost-based business case and implementation assessment." Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries 14.3 (2014):
239-256.
(声明:
本译文归XX文库所有,完整译文请到XX文库。
)
原文
ERP—EnterpriseResourcePlanning:
Acost-basedbusinesscaseandimplementationassessment
S.W.Han
Hi-TechConsultingCenter,LGCNSCo.,Ltd.,8F,PrimeTower
#10–1,Hoehyun-dong,2-ga,Jung-gu,Seoul,100–630,Korea
Abstract
Thisarticleprovidesthekeyfactorsthatarecriticaltothesuccessfulimplementationofenterpriseresourceplanning(ERP).ItreportstheresultsofastudycarriedouttoassessanumberofdifferentERPimplementationsindifferentorganizations.Acasestudymethodofinvestigationwasused,andtheexperiencesoffivemanufacturingcompaniesweredocumented.Also,thisstudyexploresandproposesanERPsystemselectionprocessandacost-basedbusinesscaseapproach.ThecriticalfactorsintheadoptionofERPareidentifiedaslearningfromtheexperiencesofothers,appointingaprocessinnovator,establishingcommitteesandprojectteams,trainingandprovidingtechnicalsupportfortheusers,andimplementingappropriatechangestotheorganizationalstructureandmanagerialresponsibilities.FormoreeffectiveERPimplementations,weadvisebuildingasupportivecultureandenvironmentwithastrongemphasisonhumanandorganizationalaspects.
1.INTRODUCTION
Throughoutthe1990s,mostlargeindustrialcompaniesinstalledenterpriseresourceplanning(ERP)systems;thatis,massivecomputerapplicationsallowingabusinesstomanageallofitsoperations(finance,requirementsplanning,humanresources,andorderfulfillment)onthebasisofasingle,integratedsetofcorporatedata.ERPpromisedhugeimprovementsinefficiency;forexample,shorterintervalsbetweenorderandpayments,lowerback-officestaffrequirements,reducedinventory,andimprovedcustomerservice.Encouragedbythesepossibilities,businessesaroundtheworldinvestedsome$300billioninERPduringthedecade(Dorien&Malcolm,2000).
Whatmostattractedmanyachiefinformationofficerwastheopportunitytoreplaceatangleofcomplex,disparate,andobsolescentapplicationswithasingleY2K-compliantsystemfromareputableandstablevendor;oneKoreanmajoroilcompany,forexample,managedtoswitchoff70oldsystemswhenERPwentlive.ByenteringcustomerandsalesdatainanERPsystem,amanufacturercangeneratethenextcycle’sdemandforecast,whichinturngeneratesordersforrawmaterials,productionschedules,timetablesforshifts,andfinancialprojectionswhilekeepingclosetrackofinventory.
AstheadoptionofERPhasincreasedbymanufacturingfirms,sohastheresearchbyacademicsandresearchersintoallaspectsofusingtheseinformationtechnologies,coveringplanning,implementation,integration,management,andexploitation(Lee&Lee,2000;Parr&Shanks,2000;Sumner,2000).Someexamplesofthesestudiesinclude:
astudyofERPin20BritishcompaniesbyCurrie(1996),astudyof95informationsystemsbyJaikumar(1997)inNorthAmerica,andastudyofERPandotherinformationsystemsintheUnitedKingdombyBessantandHaywood(1999).
PreviousfieldstudiesexaminingERPimplementationshavefoundthatexpectationsofERPwillnotbebroughttofruitionunlessaholisticapproachistakeninplanning,acquiring,implementing,andexploiting.Oneofthecriticalissuestobeconsideredinthedecisionmakingprocessisthatthelinkbetweentheinformationsystemandbusinessstrategymustrelatetothecompetitiveprioritiesandthepositioningoftheorganization.Thechoiceofinformationsystem,forwhichmanyoptionsexist,mustbedrivenby,andcloselyalignedwith,thebroaderframeworkofcompetitivepositioningdecisions.Thebasicquestion“Howdowecompete?
”mustbeansweredbeforeinformationsysteminvestmentdecisionsaremade.Therefore,thisarticlehasthreedistinctiveparts.ThefirstdescribesERPsystemselectionprocessinimplementation,thesecondaddressesacost-basedapproachtothebusinesscase,andthelastprovidesthekeyfactorsthatarecriticaltothesuccessfulimplementationofERP.Inthelastpart,theexperiencesoffiveKoreanorganizationsthataredoptedERPinrecentyearsareanalyzed.AcasestudyapproachwasusedtoexplorehereasonsforadoptingtheERP,planningandimplementationissues,benefitsachieved,andthelimitationsanddifficultiesassociatedwiththeERP.
2.ERPSYSTEMSELECTIONPROCESS
ERPsystemsofferpervasivebusinessfunctionality.Becauseofthispervasiveness,implementationshaverangedfromgreatsuccessestocompletefailures.Therefore,adviceisfrequentlysoughtinselectingsystems.However,wehaveconcludedthatthereisnosystemthatisbestforallcompanies,butratherthereisaprocessyoucangothroughtofindtherightsystemforyourcompany.Theprocessstartswithassemblingacompetentprojectteam,addressingbusinessneeds,exploringalternatives,developingcriteria,andmakinginformedjudgmentsthatleadtoasuccessfulsystem.
3.ACOST-BASEDBUSINESSCASEAPPROACH
ManycompaniesfindERPsystemshelpthemmakebetter-informeddecisions.Othersdiscovertoolatethattheirpurchasehasbeenbasedmoreonfaiththangoodjudgment,andrunuptensorevenhundredsofmillionsofdollarsinextracostsandscheduledelays(Sethi&King,1994).How,then,canseniormanagersensurethattheircompaniesbuildasoundbusinesscasefordeployingERPsystems?
Andwhatcantheydotoguaranteethatthepromisedbenefitsarenoteclipsedbythecostsofintegration,processredesign,andtraining?
Oneansweristotakeacost-basedapproachtothebusinesscase.
Hardreturns,suchasreducedheadcountresultingfromstreamlinedoperations,aresimpletopredictandcontrolbutareonlypartofthepicture.Softreturns,suchasrevenueoremployeeproductivitygains,areneithereasytopredictnorunderacompany’sdirectcontrol(Gorry&Morton,1971).TheproblemisacommononeinevaluatingITinvestments(Dempsey,Dvorak,Holen,Mark,&Meehan,1998).
InthecaseofERPsystems,thelengthofthepaybackperiodandthesizeoftheinvestmentneeded—intermsofbothcashandhumanresources—makeitunwisetoassessaprojectonanythingbutahard-returnsbasis.ThisisnottosuggestthatanERPsystemcannothelpacompanyboostrevenue,orthatemployeescannotlearntobecomemoreproductivewiththeaidofasuperiormanagementinformationsystem.ButthedifficultyandexpenseofdeployingERPmeanthatmostcompaniesshouldappraisesuchaninvestmentpurelyintermsofitspotentialtocutcosts.
4.THEKEYFACTORSFORSUCCESSFULERPIMPLEMENTATION
4.1.OverviewofCaseStudy
Thefiveorganizationsinvolvedinthisstudywerechosenafterpreliminarydiscussionwiththecompanycontactconcerningtheaimsandobjectivesoftheresearchproject.Potentialcompaniesforparticipationinthestudywereinitiallyidentifiedthroughvarioussources;thatis,suggestionsbyfacultyandstaffmembers,existingongoingpersonalcontactswithlocalcompaniesmanagers,newcontactsmadewithcompanyrepresentativesparticipatinginconferencesandseminars,andpublicityofthecompany’snewlyacquiredinformationsysteminthemedia.
4.2.FieldInterviews
Basedontheauthor’spreviousresearchinERP(Park&Han,2002;Sohaletal.,2000)andtheliterature,aninterviewquestionnairewasdevelopedandusedinfieldinterviews.Theinterviewguide(questionnaire)focusestheinquiryproceduresandensuresreasonablyconsistentinquiryproceduresatallsites(Gosse,1993).Severalvisitsweremadetoeachcompany.Duringtheinitialmeetingwithseniormanagement(typicallythemanagingdirector,generalmanager,orplanmanager),theaimsandobjectivesoftheresearchprojectweredescribedanddiscussedinsomedetail.Discussionwithseniormanagementfocusedonissuessuchastheoverallstrategyoftheorganization,thebasisofcompetitiveadvantage,competition,thecompany’sperformanceinrelationtothedimensionsofcompetitiveness,reasonsforimplementingtheparticularinformationsystem,theirroleinplanningandimplementationoftheinformationsystem,andthebenefitoftheinformationsystemtotheorganization.
4.3.ResultandSummary
Thetapedinterviewsweretranscribedandwrittenupintheformofcasestudies.Thisprocesstookaconsiderableamountoftimeaseachcasestudywentthroughanumberofdrafts,sometimesgoingbacktothecompaniesforfurtherdetailsorreplayingthetapedinterviews.Thecasestudieswerethensenttothecompanycontactforverificationandpermissionforgeneraluseinpublications.
Thewrittencasestudieswerethenusedtounderstandthefollowing:
Competitiveprioritiesandcompanygoals;
Reasonsforadoptingthenewinformationsystem;
Planningandimplementationprocedures/issues;
BenefitsachievedfromtheERPinvestment;
ThedifficultiesandlimitationsassociatedwithadoptingtheERP.
Theresultsofthisanalysisarepresentedbelowundereachoftheaboveheadings.
5.LIMITATIONSOFTHESTUDY
ThisstudyisthefirstattempttodiscussanddescribeexperiencesofERPimplementationinKorea.ThefindingsandresultsarepracticalratherthantheoreticalbecausetheparticipantsofthesurveyareactuallyERPusers.Inspiteofthisstrength,thestudyhasweaknesses.Somelimitationsoriginatedfromtheapproachofourresearch.First,wehadtorelyontheretrospectiveexperiencesoftherespondents.Itmaybearguedthatrespondentviewsmightbebiased.Second,oursamplesarelimitedtoKorea.Therefore,generalconclusionsmustbemadewithcaution.Additionally,theimplementationo
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 企业 资源 计划 ERP 外文 文献 翻译 译文 3200