欧盟水政策.docx
- 文档编号:6207519
- 上传时间:2023-01-04
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:14
- 大小:34.97KB
欧盟水政策.docx
《欧盟水政策.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《欧盟水政策.docx(14页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
欧盟水政策
PolicylegendsandwaterpolicyintheUnionTerritory
ofPuducherry
AaronMulvany
Received:
4January2013/Accepted:
9July2013/Publishedonline:
25July2013
SpringerScience+BusinessMediaDordrecht2013
AbstractWhentheFrenchcededtheirIndiancoloniestotheRepublicofIndiain1954.theyleftinplaceasystemofwaterworksandfloodmitigationstrategiesthathadantecedentstraceabletoIndia’smedievalperiod.FacedwiththeprocessofintegrationintotheIndiandemocracythenewadministrationofwhatwastobecometheUnionTerritoryofPondicherryletlanguishmanyoftheinfrastructuralimprovementsbuiltbythefomerFrenchcolonialgovernment.Overthecourseofthefollowinghalfcenturyaseriesof
narrativesdevelopedwithintheadministrationsurroundingFrenchwatercontrolandfloodmitigationmechanisms.RootedinaflawedunderstandingofthecolonialhistoryoffloodcontrolintheFrenchterritoriesofIndiathesebeliefsossifiedandhavenegativelyshaped
developmentaimedatfloodmitigationandresilienceacrossthepost-colonialUnionTerritoryofPuducherry.ThispaperusesacategorydefinedbyGaryAlanFineandBarryO’Neilltoexplorehow‘‘policylegends’’aboutFrenchwatercontrolinfrastructuresshapedbothpopularandofficialunderstandingoffloodvulnerabilityintheadministrativemadeupoftheformerFrenchterritoriesofIndia.
KeywordsIndiaFrenchIndiaWatermanagementSyndicatsagricoles
FloodmitigationPolicylegends
Itcreatesassymptomsofitspresencecharacteristicpatternsofpolicy,ofmisjudgmentandmisperceptionandofcollectivelyself-defeatingbehaviorwithinthepolicyprocess.
LloydEtheredge,CanGovernmentsLearn?
Introduction
On11November1977acyclonestrucktheCoromandelCoastofIndianearPondicherry.
OfficialweatherbulletinsreleasedbytheMeteorologicalDepartmentinMadras1warned
of‘‘squallyweather,’’tidalsurgesofuptotwometers,andsustainedwindsinexcessof
100kmperhour(ReportonCycloneandFloodDamage,p.1).Inresponse,AllIndiaRadio
beganbroadcastingwarningsupanddownthecoastofAndhraPradesh,TamilNadu,and
theUnionTerritoryofPondicherry.Despitewhatwasarelativelymodestforecast—what
amountedtoonlyacategoryonestorm—authoritiesoftheterritorialadministrationin
Pondicherrydeemedtherisksufficientenoughtotakemeasurestolimittheimpactofthe
stormonthosecoastalcommunitiesmostlikelytobeaffectedbythestorm.
AccordingtotheReportonCycloneandFloodDamagewrittenbytheUnionTerritory
ofPondicherry’sRevenueDepartment,‘‘asthecyclonewastocoverawideareaandits
coursecouldnotbepredictedwithanygreataccuracy,thisAdministrationtookallnecessarystepstowarnthepeopleandalsotoevacuatethemtosaferplaces’’(1977,p.2).
Amongthestepstakenwere‘‘repeatedwarnings…throughmike-fittedjeepandalsoby
beatofdrum’’(2009,p.3)inthePattanavarmaritimefishercommunitiesaroundPondicherryandalsoatKaraikal,theUnionTerritory’ssouthernmostdistrictlocatedonthe
ArasalarRiversome130kmtothesouth.
Thereisnoreasontochallengethetruthoftheclaimsputforwardbythisreport,
compiledasitwasintheweeksimmediatelyfollowingthestorm.Butoldermembersof
thePattanavarfishercommunities,particularlythoseinKaraikal,dotelladifferentstory.
Ininterviewafterinterviewconductedbetween2008and2010fishermeninsistedthatthere
hadbeennowarningbeforethestorm,atleastnoofficialwarning.‘‘Therewasnoprior
warninggivenbythegovernment,’’saidone,‘‘butpeopleinthecommunitysensedthe
symptomsofthecycloneandavoidedgoingintothesea[tofish].’’2Otherswhorememberedthe1977storminsistedthatfloodhadnotbeenaproblematthetimebuthadonly
becomesomorerecently:
‘‘Before[whenstormscame]therewasnodangerinthisplace.
Floodsdidnotcomehere(in˙kevellamvantille).’’3Becausecoastalvillageshadbeen
traditionallysitedonhigh,quick-drainingsanddunestheeffectsofseasonal/cyclonicflood
wasgreatlymitigatedand,asaresult,thesefishershavedevelopedaverydifferentsenseof
whatconstitutes‘‘flood.’’
Itshouldcomeasnosurprisethatmarginal,‘‘traditional’’communitieslikethoseofthe
Pattanavarfisherswouldmaintainvarioustypesoffolkloreabouttheircommunity.The
claimthatfloodsdidnotaffecttheregionsaroundPondicherryandKaraikalisone
commonbitoflocalfolklore.Itisdemonstrablyfalseinpurelywestern-historicalterms,
butitsholdonthecommunityisjustasevident.Similarly,thefolkloresurroundingthe
‘‘symptoms’’ofanoncomingstormhighlightswaysofknowingthatarepeculiarlysuited
totheneedsofthesespecificcommunities.Wedonotnecessarilyexpectsuchnotional
1
ManyplacenamesinIndiahavebeenchangedand/orlocalizedinthepost-colonialperiod.Madrasdidnot
officiallychangeitsnameuntil1996,andsinceIamreferencingaperiodsourcethatusesitscolonialnameI
retainithere.Similarly,Pondicherryretaineditscolonialspellinguntil2006,whenitsnamewasofficially
changedto‘‘Puducherry,’’andincommonspeechmanypeoplestillusetheoldername.HereIwilluse
‘‘Puducherry’’whenreferringtotheentireUnionTerritory—consistingoffouradministrativeunits:
Pondicherry,Karaikal,Mahe,andYanam—and‘‘Pondicherry’’whenquotingdirectspeechorreferringto
thedistrict/cityofPondicherry,thelargestadministrativeunitinthemodern-dayUnionTerritoryof
Puducherry.
2
Tandavasamy,KaraikalMedu,January9,2009.
3
Puthupattan,Vambakirapalaiyam,August5,2010.
approachestoknowingtheworldtobeasevidentwithinthe‘‘rational’’apparatusof
moderngovernanceastheyarewithinfolkcommunities,yetthiscanindeedbethecase.
WithinthecontemporaryadministrationoftheUnionTerritoryofPuducherrythereare
manyfactsthatarecommonlymobilizedforpolicyendsandarticulatedinthelanguageof
rationalknowing,butthewaysofknowingcertainofthese‘‘facts’’canbedecidedlynon
rational.
Alternativewaysof‘‘knowing’’policyhistory
Governmentsarerarelycharacterizedasdynamicagentsofvibrantandforward-thinking
change.Atourmostcynical,thoseofusengagedinthinkingaboutsuchthingsmightsee
governmentascharacterizedbynothingsomuchasinertia.Intheabsenceofdramatic
evidencetothecontrary,certainissuesaretreatedwithapoliteinattention,orpolicy
decisionsarebasedonwhatLloydEtheredgelongagocalled‘‘imaginationsystems’’
(1985).Developedandrefinedovermorethanadecade,Etheredge’sdescriptionofthe
effectsofimaginationsystemsonU.S.policyinLatinAmericaholdsthatnations(or
peopleorcommunities)capturedwithinsuchanimaginationsystemarerenderedinvisible
unlesssomecrisisbringsthemtoadministrativeattention.‘‘Theyaretoolackinginpower
andstatustobenoticedandtoengagemotivationforanylong-termpolicy,’’hewrites(p.
195).Amonghisunpublishedpapers4Etheredgenotesfurtherthatthesesystemsare
generatedbytheinherentnatureofthestate,thattheyareself-limiting,andthateachsuch
systemexhibitssomegapofnecessaryknowledge.Inotherwords,somethingismissingon
whichtobaseintelligentandeffectivepolicy.WithintheUnionTerritoryofPuducherry
(UTP)thesegapshavebeenfilledwithotherkindsofknowledge,knowledgewhichthough
basedonfactisnotnecessarilyfactual.
Intheyearsimmediatelyfollowingtheir1954mergerwiththerecentlyindependent
RepublicofIndiatheformerFrenchterritoriesofIndia—Pondicherry,Karaikal,Mahe,and
Yanam—foundthemselvesadriftintheseaoftheirownbureaucratichistory.Butwhere
theUnitedStatesispossessedofanenormousarchivalapparatus—forallofEtheredge’s
critiques—themodernUnionTerritoryofPuducherrylackedfromitsinceptionthe
archivaltoolsnecessarytomaintainorcreatemeaningfullinkstohistoricaldecision
making,andthepost-mergeradministrationwasinnopositiontocreatesuchanapparatus
outofwholecloth.OncethedecisiontowithdrawfromtheirIndianterritorieswasmade,
theFrenchadministrationbeganremovingdocumentsbelongingtothepremieranddeu
xie`meBureaux,therecordsoftheBureaudesaffairespolitiques,andotherfilesrelatedto
thepoliticalandmilitaryaffairsoftheirformercolonies.Lesssensitivedocumentswere
eitherdestroyedoutofhandorlefttorotinattics,beneathstaircases,orunderleaking
pipes.5WithinadecadetheadministrativerecordoftheFrenchcoloniesleftinIndiawere
inutterdisarray,asituationmyownfieldworkinthestatearchivesinPondicherrycon
firms.Theresultwasabureaucracybuiltlessuponacoherentunderstandingofpastpolicy
thanonasetofsharedbeliefsaboutwhattheon-the-groundrealitiesofthecolonial
administrationhadbeen.
Whataroseamidsttheweedsofthecollectivememoryoftheoldbureaucracygrowing
intoanewadministrationisawebofnarrativesconstitutinga‘‘policylegend’’(Fineand
O’Neill2010).AccordingtoFineandO’Neill,policylegendsaretexts‘‘that[describe]an
4
See
5
InterviewwithF.CyrilAntony,July15,2009.
institution’sactioninacontextthatsupportsaparticularpolicychoiceorpresentssocial
conditionsinacontextthatcallsforgovernmentorcollectiveaction’’(p.151).Inshort,
theypresentwhateverareperceivedtobe‘‘facts’’relevanttoanongoingpublicdebateor
pointofpolicy.Theyarelegendsinthefolkloricsenseoftheword,insofarastheypresent
‘‘anaccountofahappeningintheworldwhichthenarratororanimmediatepersonal
contactwasnotdirectlyinvolvedandis
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 欧盟 政策
![提示](https://static.bdocx.com/images/bang_tan.gif)