最新清华大学考研辅导强化班英语阅读理解讲义.docx
- 文档编号:618896
- 上传时间:2022-10-11
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:29
- 大小:42.53KB
最新清华大学考研辅导强化班英语阅读理解讲义.docx
《最新清华大学考研辅导强化班英语阅读理解讲义.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《最新清华大学考研辅导强化班英语阅读理解讲义.docx(29页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
最新清华大学考研辅导强化班英语阅读理解讲义
清华大学考研辅导强化班课程
《英语阅读理解》
PartI英语阅读考试简介
1.《大纲》要求
2.形式
5篇文章,各500字左右,后附4小题,共20小题,40分
PartII文章体裁
1.结论说明型
Passage1
Sciencehaslonghadanuneasyrelationshipwithotheraspectsofculture.ThinkofGalileo’s17th-centurytrialforhisrebellingbeliefbeforetheCatholicChurchorpoetWilliamBlake'sharshremarksagainstthemechanisticworldviewofIsaacNewton.Theschismbetweenscienceandthehumanitieshas,ifanything,deepenedinthiscentury.
Untilrecently,thescientificcommunitywassopowerfulthatitcouldaffordtoignoreitscritics-butnolonger.Asfundingforsciencehasdeclined,scientistshaveattacked"anti-science"inseveralbooks,notablyhighersuperstition,byPaulR.Gross,abiologistattheUniversityofVirginia,andNormanLeavitt,amathematicianatRutgersUniversity;andThedemon-Hauntedworld,byCarlSaganofCornellUniversity.
Defendersofsciencehavealsovoicedtheirconcernsatmeetingsuchas"TheFlightfromScienceandReason,"heldinNewYorkCityin1995,and"ScienceintheAgeof(Mis)information,"whichassembledlastJunenearbuffalo.
Anti-scienceclearlymeansdifferentthingstodifferentpeople.GrossandLeavittfindfaultprimarilywithsociologists,philosophersandotheracademicswhohavequestionedscience'sobjectivity.Saganismoreconcernedwiththosewhobelieveinghosts,creationismandotherphenomenathatcontradictthescientificworldview.
Asurveyofnewsstoriesin1996revealsthattheanti-sciencetaghasbeenattachedtomanyothergroupsaswell,fromauthoritieswhoadvocatedtheeliminationofthelastremainingstocksofsmallpoxvirustoRepublicanswhoadvocateddecreasedfundingforbasicresearch.
FewwoulddisputethatthetermappliestotheUnabomber,whosemanifesto,publishedin1995,scornsscienceandlongsforreturntoapre-technologicalutopia.Butsurelythatdoesnotmeanenvironmentalistsconcernedaboutuncontrolledindustrialgrowthareanti-science,asanessayinUSNews&WorldReportlastMayseemedtosuggest.
Theenvironmentalists,inevitably,respondtosuchcritics.Thetrueenemiesofscience,arguesPaulErichofStanfordUniversity,apioneerofenvironmentalstudies,arethosewhoquestiontheevidencesupportingglobalwarming,thedepletionoftheozonelayerandotherconsequencesofindustrialgrowth.
Indeed,someobserversfearthattheanti-scienceepithetisindangerofbecomingmeaningless."Theterm'anti-science'canlumptogethertoomany,quitedifferentthings,"notesHarvardUniversityphilosopherGoralsHoltoninhis1993workScienceandAnti-Science."Theyhaveincommononlyonethingthattendtoannoyorthreatenthosewhoregardthemselvesasmoreenlightened."
2.新老观点型
Passage2
FewpeoplewoulddefendtheVictorianattitudetochildrenbutifyouwereaparentinthosedays,atleastyouknewwhereyoustood;childrenweretobeseenandnotheard.Freudandcompanydidawaywithallthatandparentshavebeenbewilderedeversince.Thechild'shappinessisall-important,thepsychologistssay,butwhatabouttheparents'happiness?
Parentssufferconstantlyfromfearandguiltwhiletheirchildrengailyrompaboutpullingtheplaceapart.Agoodold-fashionedspankingisoutofthequestion:
nomodernchild-rearingmanualwouldpermitsuchbarbarity.Thetroubleisyouarenotallowedeventoshout.Whoknowswhatdeeppsychologicalwoundsyoumightinflict.Thepoorchildmayneverrecoverfromthedreadfultraumaticexperience.Soitisthatparentsbendoverbackwardstoavoidgivingtheirchildrencomplexwhichahundredyearsagohadn'tevenbeenheardof.Certainlyachildneedslove,andalotofit.Buttheexcessivepermissivenessofmodernparentsissurelydoingmoreharmthangood.Psychologistshavesucceededinunderminingparents'confidenceintheirownauthority.Andithasn'ttakenchildrenlongtogetwindofthefact.Inadditiontothegreatmodernclassicsonchildcare,therearecountlessarticlesinmagazinesandnewspapers.Withsomuchunsolicitedadviceflyingabout,mumanddadjustdon'tknowwhattodoanymore.Intheend,theydonothingatall.So,fromearlychildhood,thekidsareinchargeandparents'livesareregulatedaccordingtotheneedsoftheiroffspring.Whenthelittledearsdevelopintoteenagers,theytakecompletecontrol.Laxauthorityovertheyearsmakesadolescentrebellionagainstparentsallthemoreviolent.Iftheyoungpeoplearegoingtohaveaparty,forinstance,parentsareaskedtoleavethehouse.Theirpresencemerelyspoilsthefun.Whatelsecanthepoorparentsdobutobey?
Childrenarehardycreatures(farhardierthatthepsychologistswouldhaveusbelieve)andmostofthemsurvivetheharmfulinfluenceofextremepermissivenesswhichisthenormalconditioninthemodernhousehold.Butagreatmanydonot.Thespreadofjuveniledelinquencyinou
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 最新 清华大学 考研 辅导 强化 英语 阅读 理解 讲义