20XX年考研英语一完型填空及新题型解析doc.docx
- 文档编号:563608
- 上传时间:2022-10-11
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:29
- 大小:15.19KB
20XX年考研英语一完型填空及新题型解析doc.docx
《20XX年考研英语一完型填空及新题型解析doc.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《20XX年考研英语一完型填空及新题型解析doc.docx(29页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
20XX年考研英语一完型填空及新题型解析doc
2019年考研英语一完型填空及新题型解析
2019年考研英语已经结束,小编为大家提供2019年考研英语一完型填空及新题型解析,一起来看看考研英语一都考了什么吧!
2019年考研英语一完型填空及新题型解析 【完型填空】给英语“打好底” 2019年的完型填空仍旧遵循了18年的出题趋势:
文章整体难度较低,词汇较为简单,易于理解,考点主要分布在:
动介搭配、逻辑关系以及词汇的语义辨析。
值得一提的是,19年同18年一样,几乎没有红花词的可蒙性。
事实上,完形填空原本一直以来在考研的题目中处于一种比较鸡肋的角色:
食之无味,弃之可惜。
然而,自2016年起,完型基本上处于“低走”的趋势
——
降低了整体难度,让完型的可答性变强,属于只要好好准备就比较容易拿分的题目。
不过从另一方面而言,完型填空的“可答性”同时标记着另一个趋势
——
蒙红花词的3分钟速答法不再适用了。
想要在完型这一部分拿分,不能再指望蒙,而是需要实实在在地背好基础词汇,而不是像以前一样,单词大致混个眼熟就算完成任务。
如近两年考核的run
on(运转)、come
down(患病)都属于常见词的不常见用法,简单来说,完型填空的考察趋势是:
“基础词汇的深度用法”。
因此,之后的考生应该着重于给考研英语“打好底”,掌握基础词汇的基本搭配和近义词的辨析。
【新题型】反技巧的趋势 对于英语一的新题型而言,一直都是题型三选一进行考察。
然而,由于17年、18年均考察的是排序的题目,使得学生今年的备考重点基本都放在七选五和小标题上。
但是,事实证明:
新题型的出题套路确实是不可预测的,连续两年甚至更多年份考察同一个题型是大有可能的。
19年的排序题目考点仍旧由段与段之间的联系、以及文章整体的连贯性这两点构成。
在19年的题目中,仍旧未给出文章的第一段,不过,在确定第一段的过程中,给考生设置了极大的陷阱。
排序中的第一段开头“In
his
1936
work
How
to
Win
Friends
and
Influence
People,
now
one
of
the
bestselling
books
of
all
time,
Dale
Carnegie
wrote,……”
大部分考生会由于在段落开头看到了“his”这个代词,认为该选项不能做第一段,但其实his的同一句中出现了人物全名Dale
Carnegie,也就是his指代的并不是上一段中的某个人,而是本句话中的Dale
Carnegie。
因此,本篇题目中的41题选择的就是这个看似陷阱,实则引入本文话题的首段。
其次,在接下来的段落排序中,也颠覆了以往末句与首句相关联的原则。
如41题与42题就是关联在两个段落中间都提及了”avoid
argument”的话题。
接下来的43题是根据给定段落的末句“None
of
these
tricks
will
help
you
understand
them,
their
positions
or
the
issues
that
divide
you,
but
they
can
help
you
win
—
in
one
way.
”与某段首句“There
is
a
better
way
to
win
arguments.
”两段的末-首句中均提及了“赢得争论的方式”而得出关联。
在43段落中谈及了如何讨论一个话题并达到了解双方观点的目的,而作为44题答案的段落首句说的是稍带转折含义的
“Of
course,
many
discussions
are
not
so
successful.(并不是很多讨论都能如此成功)
”。
最后一题的答案是根据首句话的“These
tools
can
help
you
win
every
argument”,这里的指代词These
tools对应上一段落末句的“Raise
objections
and
listen
carefully
to
their
replies.
” 总体而言,2019年的新题型同完型一样,文章整体难度下降,不再遵循所谓的技巧,如两个段落的首句出现的指代词“These
views
of
arguments”以及“These
tools”都不能像以往一样根据找原词来作答。
很明显,考研在完型和新题型的考核上通过降低文章的难度,达到“反技巧”的目的,而对于考生而言,一味地依赖于技巧恐怕并不能带来一张满意的答卷,要拓宽视野,着眼于提高自己的英语基础能力,方能百战不殆。
【附2019年新题型排序原文节选】 41题答案:
In
his
1936
work
How
to
Win
Friends
and
Influence
People,
now
one
of
the
bestselling
books
of
all
time,
Dale
Carnegie
wrote:
“I
have
come
to
the
conclusion
that
there
is
only
one
way
under
high
heaven
to
get
the
best
of
an
argument
—
and
that
is
to
avoid
it.
Avoid
it
as
you
would
avoid
rattlesnakes
and
earthquakes.”
This
aversion
to
arguments
is
common,
but
it
depends
on
a
mistaken
view
of
arguments
that
causes
profound
problems
for
our
personal
and
social
lives
—
and
in
many
ways
misses
the
point
of
arguing
in
the
first
place. 42题答案:
Carnegie
would
be
right
if
arguments
were
fights,
which
is
how
we
often
think
of
them.
Like
physical
fights,
verbal
fights
can
leave
both
sides
bloodied.
Even
when
you
win,
you
end
up
no
better
off.
Your
prospects
would
be
almost
as
dismal
if
arguments
were
even
just
competitions
—
like,
say,
tennis
tournaments.
Pairs
of
opponents
hit
the
ball
back
and
forth
until
one
victor
emerges
from
all
who
entered.
Everybody
else
loses.
This
kind
of
thinking
is
why
so
many
people
try
to
avoid
arguments,
especially
about
politics
and
religion. (给定选项)These
views
of
arguments
also
undermine
reason.
If
you
see
a
conversation
as
a
fight
or
competition,
you
can
win
by
cheating
as
long
as
you
don’t
get
caught.
You
will
be
happy
to
convince
people
with
bad
arguments.
You
don’t
mind
interrupting
them.
You
can
call
their
views
crazy,
stupid,
silly
or
ridiculous,
or
you
can
joke
about
how
ignorant
they
are,
how
short
they
are
or
how
small
their
hands
are.
None
of
these
tricks
will
help
you
understand
them,
their
positions
or
the
issues
that
divide
you,
but
they
can
help
you
win
—
in
one
way. 43题答案:
There
is
a
better
way
to
win
arguments.
Imagine
that
you
favor
increasing
the
minimum
wage
in
our
state,
and
I
do
not.
If
you
yell,
“Yes,”
and
I
yell,
“No,”
then
you
see
me
as
selfish,
and
I
see
you
as
thoughtless.
Neither
of
us
learns
anything,
so
we
neither
understand
nor
respect
each
other,
and
we
have
no
basis
for
compromise
or
cooperation.
In
contrast,
suppose
you
give
a
reasonable
argument:
that
full-time
workers
should
not
have
to
live
in
poverty.
Then
I
counter
with
another
reasonable
argument:
that
a
higher
minimum
wage
will
force
businesses
to
employ
less
people
for
less
time.
Now
we
can
understand
each
other’s
positions
and
recognize
our
shared
values,
since
we
both
care
about
needy
workers. 44题答案:
Of
course,
many
discussions
are
not
so
successful.
We
cannot
learn
from
our
interlocutors
if
we
do
not
listen
to
them
patiently
or
do
not
trust
them
to
express
their
re
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 20 XX 考研 英语 一完型 填空 题型 解析 doc