外文翻译考察城乡收入差距.docx
- 文档编号:5496085
- 上传时间:2022-12-17
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:9
- 大小:23.53KB
外文翻译考察城乡收入差距.docx
《外文翻译考察城乡收入差距.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《外文翻译考察城乡收入差距.docx(9页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
外文翻译考察城乡收入差距
2200单词,11900英文字符,3468汉字
出处:
ChristofidesCA,NeelakantanP,BehrT.ExaminingtheRural-UrbanIncomeGap[J].
本科毕业论文外文翻译
考察城乡收入差距
院(系、部)名称:
财经学院
专业名称:
财务会计教育
学生姓名:
学生学号:
指导教师:
2010年11月10日
ExaminingtheRural-UrbanIncomeGap
C.A.Christofides,PatsNeelakantan,ToddBehr
ThereisanincomegapbetweenruralandurbanPennsylvania,and,sincethe1980s,thisgaphasbeengrowing.Thesearejustsomeofthefindingsfromresearch,completedin2005,whichlookedat30yearsofdatafromtheU.S.CensusBureau,theU.S.BureauofEconomicAnalysis,andthePennsylvaniaDepartmentsofRevenue,LaborandIndustry,Education,Health,Welfare,andCommunityandEconomicDevelopment.
TolearnifthereisameasurableincomegapbetweenandwithinPennsylvania’sruralandurbancountiesandtoidentifythecausesofthegap,ifitinfactexisted,theresearcherssetouttoidentifyandanalyzefactorsaffectingincomegrowthinruralPennsylvaniaandtocompareruralincomegrowthwithurbanincomegrowth.
Theresearchersfoundthat,in2001,thepercapitaincomeinruralPennsylvaniawas$23,941,whilethepercapitaincomeinurbanPennsylvaniawas$32,578:
this$8,637percapitaincomegapbetweenruralandurbanPennsylvaniahadincreasedsincethe1980s.Theresearchersalsofoundthatcertainfactors,suchaseducationalattainment,workforceparticipation,andnationaleconomictrends,tendedtoaffectincomegrowthinruralPennsylvania.Otherresearchfindingswerethat:
theincomegapbetweenupperandlowerincomehouseholdshadincreasedwithineveryPennsylvaniacountyfrom1980to1998;variablesaffectingurbanincomegrowthweresimilartovariablesaffectingruralincomegrowth;andtaxesassessedatthelocalandcountylevelshadnosignificanteffectonpersonalincomewithinPennsylvaniacounties.
Toclosetheruralurbanincomegap,theresearchersrecommendedfocusingeffortstoincreaseeducationalattainmentandrurallaborforceparticipation.
In1991,theCenterforRuralPennsylvaniapublishedareportentitled“TheWideningRural-UrbanIncomeGap:
PastTrendorForecastforthe1990s.”Thisreportnoteda$4,700incomegapbetweenruralandurbanareasandthesteadyincreaseinthegapduringthe1980s.
Thisresearch,whichwascompletedin2005,revisitedtheearlierstudyandfoundthattheincomegapbetweenruralandurbanPennsylvaniaisstillpresentandcontinuestoincrease.Theresearchalsolookedatthecausesoftheincomegapandfactorsthathavecausedthegaptoincrease.
FINDINGS
IncomegapexistsbetweenPennsylvania’sruralandurbancounties
WithinPennsylvania,incomeswerenotevenlydistributed.In2001,17percentofthetotalpersonalincomewithinthestatewasfoundinruralcountiesand83percentwasinurbancounties.Nearlyonehalfoftheincomeinthestatewasfoundinsixcounties:
Allegheny,Philadelphia,Montgomery,Chester,Delaware,andBucks.
Evenonapercapitabasis,incomeswerenotevenlydistributed.In2001,thepercapitaincomeinPennsylvaniaruralcountieswas$23,941,whileinurbancountiesthepercapitaincomewas$32,578,or$8,637higher.WithinPennsylvania,thehighestpercapitaincomeswereinMontgomery,Chester,andBuckscounties,eachwithincomesinexcessof$38,900.ThelowestpercapitaincomeswerefoundinTioga,Greene,andHuntingdoncounties,wherethepercapitaincomewaslessthan$20,500.
Nationally,therewasasimilarpatterninincomedisparity.In2001,16percentoftotalpersonalincomewasinruralcountiesand84percentwasinurbancounties.Thedisparityinincomesisfurtherillustratedbythefactthat50percentofthetotalincomeintheU.S.canbefoundinonly100ofthemorethan3,000countiesnationwide.
IncomegaphasgrownbetweenPennsylvania’sruralandurbancounties
Percapitaincomesinruralandurbancountiesincreasedbetween1969and2001.Meanwhile,therehasbeenapersistentgapinpercapitaincomebetweenPennsylvania’sruralandurbancounties.In1969,therewasa19percentgapbetweenruralandurbanpercapitaincomes,andoverthenext32years,thatgapwidenedto25percent.
Totalpersonalincomeinitiallygrewfasterinruralcountiesrelativetourbancountiesbetween1969and2001,decreasingthegapearlyon.However,mostoftheruralgrowthoccurredbetween1969and1979,afterwhichruralincomegrowthslowedwhileurbanincomegrowthaccelerated.Inaddition,urbancountieshavebeenlosingpopulationwhileruralcountieshavebeengainingpopulation.Thisincreaseintheruralpopulation,alongwiththeslowerpersonalincomegrowthrates,hasdepressedruralpercapitaincomerelativetourbanpercapitaincome.
Shiftinsourcesofincome
AccordingtotheU.S.BureauofEconomicAnalysis,personalincomecomesfromthreedifferentsources:
wagesandsalary;interest,dividendsandrent(investments);andtransferpayments.Wagesandsalaryarereferredtoas“earnedincome,”whiledividends,interest,andrent,andtransferpayments,suchasunemploymentcompensation,pensions,andSocialSecurity,areconsideredunearnedincome.AsFigure3shows,about62percentofruralincomecomesfromearnedsourcesand38percentcomefromunearnedsources.
Overtime,thepercentageofincomefromearnedsourceshasdeclinedwhileincomefromunearnedsourceshasincreased.,In1969,nearly78percentofallruralincomecamefromearnedsources;however,by2001,thispercentagedroppedtolessthan62percent.Urbanareas,andthenationasawhole,havealsoexperiencedasimilarincomeshift.
Thisshiftdoesnotmeanthatwageshavedeclined.Instead,itsuggeststhatunearnedsourcesofincomehavebecomemoreprominent.Forexample,between1969and2001,40percentoftheincreaseinincomewasattributedtogrowthinunearnedincome.
Percapitaincomechanges
Between1969and2001,percapitaincomeinPennsylvania’sruralcountiesincreased645percent,notadjustedforinflation.Amongthestate’surbancountiestherewasa710percentincrease.ThecountieswiththehighestincreasewereBucks,Centre,Chester,andMontour,eachwithanincreaseofmorethan800percent.
Incomedistributionwithincounties
Toestimatethedistributionofincomewithineachcounty,theresearchersusedtheGinicoefficient,whichiswidelyusedtomeasurethedegreeofhouseholdincomeinequalitybyusingavaluethatrangesbetween0and1.Avalueof0meansthatincomeswithinagrouparedistributedequally,whileavalueof1meansthatincomesaredistributedunequally.
Factorsinfluencingtherural-urbanincomegap
Nationaleconomy
Thesizeoftheincomegapissensitivetonationaleconomictrends.Beforethe1981-1982recession,thegapbetweenruralandurbanpercapitaincomeswas,onaverage,17percent.Afterthisrecession,thegapincreasedtoanaverageof23percent.ThechangeinruralPennsylvania’spercapitaincomecloselyfollowschangesinthenationalgrossdomesticproduce(orGDP).TheGDPrepresentsthedollarvalueofallfinalgoodsandservicesproducedintheU.S.inayear.Duringprosperousyears,ruralincomeincreasedandduringlessprosperousyears,ruralincomedecreased.ThissuggeststhatincomesinruralPennsylvaniaarenotseparatefromnationaleconomictrends.
Theeconometricmodelusedintheresearchsuggeststhatevery$1billionincreaseinGDPcontributestoan86-centincreaseintheincomegapbetweenruralandurbanPennsylvania.Between1969and2001,thenation’sGDPincreasedby$9.2trillionwhilethegapbetweenruralandurbanpercapitaincomesincreasedbynearly$7,900.
Populationchange
TotalpersonalincomeinruralPennsylvaniagrewatafasterratethanthepopulation.Between1969and2001,thepopulationinruralPennsylvaniaincreased17percent,whiletotalpersonalincomeincreasednearly770percent.Duringthesameperiod,thepopulationinurbanPennsylvaniaincreasedonly2percentwhiletotalpersonalincomeincreased725percent.Althoughtheruralpopulationgrewmorerapidly,thegrowthofruraltotalpersonalincomedidnotkeeppace,andthishelpedtodepressruralpercapitaincomerelativetourbanpercapitaincome.
Shiftinemploymentandwages
BothruralandurbancountiesinPennsylvaniahaveseensignificantdeclinesinmanufacturingemploymentbetween1969and2000andalargeincreaseinserviceemployment.Thispatternalsooccurrednationally.Theshiftinemploymentwasmirroredbyashiftinearnings.In1969,36percentofallearningscamefrommanufacturingjobs,andonly12percentcamefromservicejobs.Thirty-oneyearslater,manufacturingearningsaccountedfor24percentofallearningsandserviceearningsaccountedfor22percent.Therewasasimilarshiftinthestate’surbancounties.
Despiteitsdecline,manufacturingisstillthelargestincomesourceforresidentsinruralcounties.However,itisimportanttonotethat,unlikepersonalincomedata,whichisrecordedbyplaceofresidence,employmentandearningsdataarerecordedbyplaceofwork.
Theeffectoftheemploymentandearningshiftfrommanufacturingtoserviceontherural-urbanincomegapwasverysmall.TheemploymentandearningshiftaffectedbothruralandurbanPennsylvaniaatroughlythesametime.Asaresult,thisshiftwasnotprimarilyresponsibleforthewideningincomegapbetweenruralandurbanareas.Inaddition,thoughmanybelievethatmanufacturingjobspaymorethanservicejobs,manymanufacturingjobs,suchasthoseinthetextileindustry,payrelativelylowwages,whileservicejobs,suchasthoseintheeducationandhealthcaresectors,payrelativelyhighwages.Inaddition,thedegreeofunionization,theageandeducationofworkers,andnumerousotherfacto
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 外文 翻译 考察 城乡 收入 差距
![提示](https://static.bdocx.com/images/bang_tan.gif)