国外新型农业经营体系文献综述英.docx
- 文档编号:4150281
- 上传时间:2022-11-28
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:28
- 大小:48KB
国外新型农业经营体系文献综述英.docx
《国外新型农业经营体系文献综述英.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《国外新型农业经营体系文献综述英.docx(28页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
国外新型农业经营体系文献综述英
1
KnickelK.Agriculturalstructuralchange:
impactontheruralenvironment[J].JournalofRuralStudies,1990,6(4):
383-393.
Abstract
Currentfarmpracticescontributetoawidearrayofenvironmentalproblems:
themonocultureofmanyagriculturalregions,theproblemofsoilerosion,andthecontaminationofgroundwaterresourcesbynitrateandpesticide,wildlifehabitatslostorsubjecttofragmentation.Over50%oftheEC'stotallandareaisusedbyagriculture.
Assumedarelinksbetweensettlementandfarmstructure,ruralculture,relatedvaluesandenvironmentalquality.Thispaperattemptstoidentifykeyindicatorsandrelationshipstopredictwhattheenvironmentalimpactofcertainstructuralchangeswillbe.Isthereacorrelationbetweenfarmsizeortypeandenvironmentalimpact?
Anexampleisthedecreasinglinkagebetweenanimalhusbandryandcropgrowing.
Isthereacorrelationbetweendegreeofpluriactivityandthestructureoflanduse?
ThemajorityofsmallfarmsintheF.R.G.haveadditionaloff-farmincome.Thepredominanceofsmallfarmsischaracteristicofthefewcharmingruralareasleft.Doesthatimplythatlargefarmunitsmeannecessarilyinfrastructuralchanges,lossofcropdiversityandmoremonotonouslandscape?
Finally,thequestionoftheimpactthatdifferentpolicymeasureshaveonthedirectionandintensityofagriculturalchangeisexamined.Amajorconclusionisthatenvironmentalpoliciesneedtobeanintegralpartofregionaldevelopmentandagriculturalpolicies.
2
GoldsmithP,GowH.Strategicpositioningunderagriculturalstructuralchange:
Acritiqueoflongjumpco-operativeventures[J].InternationalFoodandAgribusinessManagementReview,2005,8
(2):
1-21.
Abstract
Thisstudyutilizesstrategicmanagementtheorytoanalyzetherecentproliferationinnon-commodityverticalintegrationproducer-ownedbusinessesintheUS.ThepaperintroducesthenotionoftheValueCreationTriadwhereownership,competency,andcontrolneedtobealignedforsuccess.VeryrelatedtotheTriadconceptisthedifferentiationinstrategybetweenlongandshortjumping.ThepaperpresentsanempiricalcaseofsuccessfulverticalintegrationbyaNewZealandlambcooperative.
Keywords:
strategicmanagementtheory,valueaddedagriculture,verticalintegration,producer-ownedenterprise,corecompetencies,tacitknowledge,productivitygap,opportunitygap
Structuralchangeisadisruptiveprocess.Whetheryouareinthesteelindustryinthe1970'sorproductionagricultureinthe1990'stheeffectsareextremelyunsettling(RoseandThomas,2000;CP,2000).Producersarebeingforcedtoeitherexittheindustryoradoptnewbusinessmodels,buttoaccomplishthistheyarefacedwiththedifficulttaskofstrategicallyrepositioningthemselves.JustinthestateofIllinois,forexample,therewere40valueaddedprocessing
businessplansindevelopmentduring20001(Saputo,2000).Theselongjumpventuresintoprocessingareriskythoughandraiseimportantfundamentalquestionsabouthowproducersselectappropriatestrategies,andisthesubjectofthismanuscript.
Whiletherehasbeenresearchandanalysisastothesuccessfactorsofnewcooperatives(Waner,2000;Bruynisetal,2001;Torgerson,2001;Carlbergetal,2004),littleempiricalresearchhasbeenconductedastotheirsuccessandfailurerates.Waner(2000)andTorgerson(2001)believethefailureratetobelessthanthefailurerateoftheaveragestartup.SporlederandBailey(2001)intheirmodelofnewgenerationequityinvestmentassumeamoderatefailureraterangeof33%and50%.Theresearchisclearastosuccessfactors,focusingonthetacticalfeaturesofthebusiness,i.e.,adequatecapital,hiringskilledmanagement,andhavinganengagedboardofdirectors.Leftunaddressedintheanalysisarethestrategicforcesthatdeterminesuccessorfailure.Withthisinmindthismanuscriptanalysesthecooperativeformationquestionfromastrategicmanagementperspective.
Conclusion
Asdescribedabove,agriculturalstructuralchangeisapowerfulforceandproduceradaptationsarenecessarytoremaincompetitive.Therearenumerousstrategiesavailabletoproducerorganizationsastheyattempttofindtheirplaceinthesupplychain.Strategicmanagementtheorysuggeststhatlongjumporradicalstrategicshiftsareunlikelytobesuccessful.Thelogicisthatsustainedcompetitiveadvantageisderivedfromafirm’sabilitytoproducevalue.Inordertoproducethisvaluethefirmrequiresaccesstoknowledge.Thetypeofknowledgethatgeneratesinnovationrentsisknowledgethatisinimitable,tacitknowledge.Howthendoesthefirmlookingtoverticallyintegrateobtainthenecessarytacitknowledge?
Becausethisstrategicresourceisnotexplicit,itisdifficulttoacquire.
3
BoehljeM.Structuralchangesintheagriculturalindustries:
howdowemeasure,analyzeandunderstandthem?
[J].AmericanJournalofAgriculturalEconomics,1999,81(5):
1028-1041.
AFinalComment
Theagriculturalindustriesareinthemidstofprofoundstructuralchange-astructuralre-alignmentthatwillimpactvirtuallyallsegmentsandalmostalltheeconomicagentsorparticipantsinthefoodproduction,processtaWouthSestrniveUsitynoprilA5,20142otp:
/ajae.oxfhrdjournals.org/ownlDadedromf1040Number5,1999ing,anddistributionindustries.Thisnewagriculturecanbestbecharacterizedbytwodramaticchangesinthewayinwhichbusinessisdoneintheagriculturesector:
(a)thetransitionfromindependenteconomicstagesco-ordinatedprimarilybymarketstomuchmore
tightlyalignedfoodsupplyorvaluechainscoordinatedbyvariousformsofnegotiatedlinkagesand(b)theimplementationofbio-logicalmanufacturingandprocesscontroltechnologythroughouttheentirechain,enablingthisvaluechaintoincreasinglyfunctionasanassemblylinethatproducesbio-logicallybasedspecificattributerawmaterialsforconsumers/endusers.Theimpactsofthesechangesarebothpervasiveanddramatic-veryfewparticipantsintheagriculturalandfoodproductionanddistributionindustrieswillbebypassedinthistransformationprocess,andthechangeswillchallengesomeofthelong-standingfundamentalvaluesorpremisesoftheparticipantsandeconomicagentsinthisindustry,suchasindependence,open-accessmarkets,thedominantroleofthefirm,open-accessinformation,andR&D.Thesestructuralrealignmentswillchangenotonlythetypeandformofrelationshipsbetweenparticipantsinthefoodproductionanddistributionindustriesbutalsotheparticipantsinthoserelationships.Somewillgaineconomicallyandotherwisefromthesestructuralchanges;manywilllose.Consequently,thisstructuralrealignmentprocesswillbefraughtwithgreatcontroversyandconfrontation.Sowhatcanweasagriculturaleconomistsdotomeasure,analyze,andunderstandtheprofoundstructuralchangesnowunderwayintheagriculturalindustries?
Whatcanwedotoinformthediscussionanddebateconcerningtheseissues?
First,wecanandmustfocusadditionalemphasisontheseissuesunlesswearecontenttoexplainexpostwhythechangesoccurredratherthananalyzeexantewhatstructuralchangesmightoccurandwhattheconsequencesorimpactsarelikelytobe.Mostofourconstituentswillbeincreasinglydis-satisfiedwithourexplanationsofhistory(nomatterhowaccurate)whentheyaretryingtoadapttoafuturethattheydonotunderstandandinwhichtheirroleisprofoundlychangedortheyhavemaybeevenbecomeredundant.Wemustdeveloptheanalyticalcapacityformoreaccurateexanteratherthanexpostanalyses,andwecannotbeconfinedtoourtraditionaldisciplinaryframeworksandempiricaltools.WemustbewillingtostartwithAmer.J.Agr.Econ.alternativebasicpremises-forexample,thatanalysisofeconomicperformancemightbebetterunderstoodstartingwiththepremisesofeconomicfunctionsandsupply/valuechainsratherthanfirmsandmarkets.Wemustbroadenourdisciplinarybasesofanalysestoincludethebroadersetofsocialsciencesthatmightbecomeincreasinglymorerelevantinunderstandingthebehaviorofeconomicagentsandtheefficiencyandeffectivenessoftheperformanceofeconomicsystemsthanourmoretraditionalandfrequentlyconfiningconceptualframeworksdrawnprimarilyfromeconomictheory.Wemustdevelopandaccessnewdatasetsthat,inmanycases,aregen-ratedbytalkingtoandobservingthebehaviorofeconomicagentsratherthancollectedfromsecondarysourcesandhistoricalsynopses.Andwemustbewillingandabletoembracetheverydifficultissueofdistributionalconsequencesinouranalyses;assess-mintsofaggregateeconomicperformanceandofimpactsonconsumers(asagroup)orproducers(asagroup)arenotunimportant,buttherealissuesinperiodsofprofoundstructuralchangearewhichproducers,whichconsumers,andwhichofthenumerouspareticpantsoreconomicagentsinthesector
winandwhoisleftbehind.Ifwecannotshedsomelightonthisissueofwhowinsandwholoses,wewillhavedamagedthepublictrustintheagriculturaleconomicsprofession.
4
OrtmannGF,KingRP.AgriculturalcooperativesI:
history,theoryandproblems[J].Agrekon,2007,46
(1):
18-46.
Abstract
Thispaperpresentstheprinciplesofcooperationandbrieflydescribesthehistoryanddevelopmentofagriculturalcooperativesindevelopedandless-developedcountries,withparticularemphasisonSouthAfrica.AnewCooperativesAct,basedoninternationalprinciplesofcooperation,waspromulgatedinSouthAfricainAugust2005.Thetheoryofcooperatives,andnewinstitutionaleconomicstheory(NIE)(includingtransactioncosteconomics,agencytheoryandpropertyrightstheory)anditsapplicabilitytothec
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 国外 新型 农业 经营 体系 文献 综述