Judicial System 司法系统.docx
- 文档编号:3988358
- 上传时间:2022-11-26
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:5
- 大小:19.86KB
Judicial System 司法系统.docx
《Judicial System 司法系统.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Judicial System 司法系统.docx(5页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
JudicialSystem司法系统
JudicialSystem司法系统
JudicialSystem司法系统BackgroundKnowledge背景知识美国法院系统的突出特点是双轨制,即由联邦法院和州法院这两个相互独立且平行的体系组成。
联邦法院行使美国宪法授与联邦政府的司法管辖权。
在刑事领域中,联邦法院负责审理那些违犯联邦法律的刑事案件;在民事领域中,联邦法院负责审理以合众国为一方、涉及联邦性质的问题,以及发生在不同州的公民之间且有管辖权争议等种类的民事案件。
州法院的司法管辖权较为广泛。
按照美国宪法的规定,凡是法律未明确授与联邦法院的司法管辖权,均属于州法院。
在实践中,绝大多数刑事案件和大多数民事案件都是由各州法院审判的。
联邦法院是一个统一的系统。
它由联邦最高法院(theSupremeCourt)、13个联邦上诉法院(CourtsofAppeals)和94个联邦地区法院(DistrictCourts)组成。
此外还有索赔法院(theCourtofClaims)、关税法院(theCustomsCourt)、关税及专利上诉法院(theCourtofCustomsandPatentAppeals)等联邦特别法院(SpecialCourts)。
各州的法院系统并不完全相同,但一般也都包括三级法院:
基层法院多称为审判法院(TrialCourt)或巡回法院(CircuitCourt);中级法院多称为上诉法院(AppellateCourtorCourtofAppeals);高级法院多称为最高法院(SupremeCourt),但在纽约等州,高级法院称为上诉法院。
许多州也有一些专门法院,如遗嘱检验法院(ProbateCourt)、青少年法院(JuvenileCourt)、家庭关系法院(CourtofDomesticRelations)和小额索赔法院(SmallClaimsCourt)等。
此外,每个城市还有自己的法院,主要负责审理交通违法、青少年犯罪、家庭纠纷及其他与城市法令有关的案件。
美国的联邦法官都是由总统任命的;各州的法官多经选举产生,但也有些是由地方行政长官(如州长或市长)或地方立法机关(如州议会或市议会)任命的。
一般来说,联邦和州最高法院的法官称为大法官(Justice),上诉法院和审判法院的法官则称为法官(Judge)。
此外,有此基层法院的审判人员还称为治安法官(JusticeofthePeace)或司法官(Magistrate)。
美国的法官虽没有职称级别之分,但人们有时也会看到副(Associate,或译助理)法官的称谓。
例如,美国联邦最高法院的9名大法官中,除首席大法官(ChiefJustice)外,其他8人均可称为副(或助理)大法官(AssociateJustice);而一些州审判法院的巡回法官(CircuitJudge)之下也设有副(或助理)法官(AssociateJudge)。
在美国,一审案件一般由一名法官独立审判,上诉案件则由若干名法官组成合议庭(CollegiatePanelorCollegiateBench)共同审判。
Text课文OverviewoftheJudicialSystemintheUnitedStatesPartOneCourtsTherearefifty-twoseparatecourtsystemsintheUnitedStates.Eachstate,aswellastheDistrictofColumbia,hasitsownfullydeveloped,independentsystemofcourtsandthereisaseparatefederalcourtsystem.Thefederalcourtsarenotsuperiortothestatecourts;theyareanindependent,coordinatesystemauthorizedbytheUnitedStatesConstitution,Art.Ⅲ,2,tohandlemattersofparticularfederalinterest.Thepresenceoftwoparallelcourtsystemsoftenraisesquestionsconcerningtherelationshipofthestateandfederalsystems,presentingimportantissuesoffederalism.TheUnitedStatesSupremeCourt,composedofninejustices,sitsasthefinalandcontrollingvoiceoverallthesesystems.Althoughafewstates,suchasNebraska,haveatwo-tieredsystem,moststates,aswellasthefederalcourts,arebasedonathree-tieredmodel.Thatmeansthatforanylitiganttherewillbetheopportunitytopleadhiscasebeforeatrialcourtandthen,shouldhelose,therearetwolevelsofappealatwhichheultimatelymaysucceed.Forexample,inthefederalsystemthetrialcourtistheUnitedStatesDistrictCourt,ofwhichthereisatleastoneineverystate.Manylargerstatesaredividedintotwo,threeorevenfourjudicialdistricts,dependingonpopulation,geographyandcaseload.Thereareninety-fourdistrictsintheUnitedStatesandeachdistrictcourthasonejudge,ormorecommonlytwoormore.Afteranadversejudgmentinthedistrictcourt,alitigantmayappealtotheUnitedStatesCourtofAppealsforthecircuitinwhichthedistrictcourtislocated.Thereareelevennumberedintermediateappellatecourtsinthefederalsystem,eachincludinganywherefromthreetotenstatesandterritories.Additionally,thereisaCourtofAppealsfortheDistrictofColumbia,hearingappealsfromthefederaldistrictcourtthere,andonefortheFederalCircuit,takingappealsfromvariousspecializedfederaltribunals,suchastheClaimsCourt.Eachcourtofappealshasfourormorejudgeswhositinpanelsofthreetoreviewdistrictcourtdecisions,aswellassomedecisionsofadministrativeagencies.Alosinglitigantinthecourtofappealsmay,insomecases,beabletoobtainreviewbytheUnitedStatesSupremeCourt.Casesinthestatecourtssimilarlymayproceedthroughatrialcourt,astateappellatecourt,andthenthestatesupremecourt.IfafederalconstitutionalquestionisinvolvedthedecisionofthestatesupremecourtmaybereviewedbytheUnitedStatesSupremeCourt.Since1988,reviewbytheSupremeCourtincivilcasesisdiscretionary;virtuallyallcivilappealsasofrighttothehighestcourthavebeenabolished.Three-tieredsystemsvaryontherolewhichthehighestcourtplays.Theapproachestakenreflectdifferingphilosophieswithregardtowhatthehighestcourtshoulddo.Forexample,inCaliforniaonlycriminalcasesinwhichcapitalpunishmenthasbeenimposedareappealableasofrighttothestatesupremecourt.Similarly,inthefederalcourts,exceptinafewverylimitedcircumstances,appealstotheUnitedStatesSupremeCourtarediscretionary,bywritofcertiorari.TheCourtdecidesforitselfwhatarethemostimportantquestionsthatdeserveitsattentionandwillrefusetoreviewdecisionsraisingissuesthatitfeelsarenotascrucial.Inthiswayitsupervisestheadministrationoflawbythelowercourtsonanadhocbasis.Attheotherendofthespectrum,suchasinNewYork,appealstothestate'shighestcourtareasofrightinagreatmanycasesprovidedforbystatute.TheprimaryfunctionofthehighestcourtinNewYorkappearstobetoassurethatcasesarecorrectlydecided.Itisnecessarytocheckcarefullythestatutesofthesysteminwhichyouareappearingtodeterminethespecificrulesregardingreviewbythoseappellatecourts.PartTwo:
JudgesFewerthanoneintwentyofthoseadmittedtopracticelawisafederal,state,county,ormunicipalcourtjudge.Exceptforsomeinferiorcourts,judgesaregenerallyrequiredtobeadmittedtopracticebutdonotpracticewhileonthebench.Thereissolittleuniformitythatitisdifficulttogeneralizefurtherthantopointoutthreesalientcharacteristicsthatrelatetotheranksfromwhichjudgesaredrawn,tothemethodoftheirselection,andtotheirtenure.Judgesaredrawnfromthepracticingbarandlessfrequentlyfromgovernmentserviceortheteachingprofession.ThereisintheUnitedStatesnocareerjudiciarylikethatfoundinmanyothercountriesandthereisnoprescribedroutefortheyounglawgraduatewhoaspirestobeajudge,noapprenticeshipthatmustbeserved,noservicethatmustbeentered.Theoutstandingyounglawgraduateswhoactforayearortwoaslawclerkstothemostdistinguishedjudgesofthefederalandstatecourtshaveonlytherewardoftheexperiencetotakewiththemintopracticeandnotthepromiseofajudicialcareer.Whileitisnotuncommonforavacancyonahighercourttobefilledbyajudgefromalowercourt,eventhiscannotbesaidtobetherule.Thelegalprofessionisnotentirelyunawareoftheadvantagesofacareerjudiciary,butitisgenerallythoughtthattheyareoutweighedbytheexperienceandindependencewhichAmericanlawyersbringtothebench.Manyoftheoutstandingjudgesofthecountry'shighestcourtshavehadnopriorjudicialexperience.Criticismhascenteredinsteadontheprevalentmethodofselectionofjudges.Statecourtjudgesareusuallyelected,commonlybypopularvote,butoccasionallybythelegislature.Popularelectionhasbeenthesubjectofmuchdisapproval,includingthatoftheAmericanBarAssociation,onthegroundthatthepubliclacksinterestinandinformationoncandidatesforjudicialofficeandthatthereforetheoutcomeistoooftencontrolledbyleadersofpoliticalparties.Thesituationhasbeensomewhatimprovedsincemanylocalbarassociationshaveundertakentoevaluatethequalificationsofcandidatesandtosupportoropposethemonthisbasis.Since1937,theAmericanBarAssociationhasadvocatedthesubstitutionofasystemunderwhichthegovernorappointsjudgesfromalistsubmittedbyaspecialnominatingboardandthejudgethenperiodicallystandsunopposedforreelectionbypopularvoteonthebasisofhisorherrecord.Suchasystemisnowineffect,foratleastsomejudges,inasubstantialminorityofstates.Inasmallgroupofstates,judgesareappointedbythegovernorsubjecttolegislativeconfirmation.Thisisalsothemethodofselectionoffederaljudges,whoareappointedbythePresidentsubjecttoconfirmationbytheSenate.EvenundertheappointivesystemtheselectionofjudgesisnotimmunefrompoliticalinfluenceandappointeesareusuallyofthePresidentsorgovernorsownparty.ButnamesofcandidatesforthefederaljudiciaryaresubmittedtoacommitteeoftheAmericanBarAssociationandappointmentisusuallymadeonlywithitsapproval.Theofficeofchiefjudgeorchiefjusticeisusuallyfilledinthesamemannerasotherjudicialoffices,althoughinsomestatesitisfilledfromamongthemembersofthecourtbyrotation,byseniorityofservice,orbyvoteofthejudges.TheChiefJusticeoftheUnitedStatesisappointedbythePresident,subjecttoSenateconfirmation.Thethirdcharacteristicisthatjudgescommonlyserveforatermofyearsratherthanforlife.Forcourtsofgeneraljurisdictionitistypicallyfour,six,oreightyears,andforappellatecourts,six,eight,ortenyears.Happily,evenwhereselectionisbypopularelection,itiscustomarytoreturntoofficeforsittingjudgeswhoseservicehasbeensatisfactory.Inafewstatecourtsandinthefederalcourtsthejudgessitforlife.Whetheronthebenchforatermofyearsorforlife,ajudgemayberemovedfromofficeonlyforgrossmisconductandonlybyformalproceedings.Instancesofremovalhavebeenrareindeedandonlyahandfuloffederaljudgeshavebeenremovedbyformalproceedings.Theindependenceofthejudiciaryisalsoencouragedbytherulethatajudgeincursnocivilliabilityforjudicialacts,evenifguiltyoffraudandcorruption.TheAmericanBarAssociationsCodeofJudicialConducthasbeenwidelyadoptedasastandardtowhichjudgesareexpectedtoadhere.Salariesforthehigherjudicialofficesareu
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- Judicial System 司法系统 司法 系统