心理学导论transcript06.docx
- 文档编号:30755685
- 上传时间:2023-08-20
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:19
- 大小:31.49KB
心理学导论transcript06.docx
《心理学导论transcript06.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《心理学导论transcript06.docx(19页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
心理学导论transcript06
IntroductiontoPsychology:
Lecture6Transcript
February5,2007
< ProfessorPaulBloom: Thisclasstodayisaboutlanguage.Andlanguageis,toalargeextent,wheretheactionis.Thestudyofhumanlanguagehasbeenthebattlegroundoverdifferenttheoriesofhumannature.So,everyphilosopherorpsychologistorhumanistorneuroscientistwhohaseverthoughtaboutpeoplehashadtomakesomeclaimaboutthenatureoflanguageandhowitworks.I'mincludingherepeoplelikeAristotleandPlato,Hume,Locke,FreudandSkinner.I'malsoincludingmodern-dayapproachestocomputationaltheory,cognitiveneuroscience,evolutionarytheoryandculturalpsychology.Ifyouhopetomakeitwithatheoryofwhatpeopleareandhowpeoplework,youhavetoexplainandtalkaboutlanguage.Infact,languageissufficientlyinterestingthat,unlikemostotherthingsI'lltalkaboutinthisclass,thereisanentirefielddevotedtoitsstudy,thefieldoflinguisticsthatisentirelydevotedtostudyingthenuancesandstructuresofdifferentlanguages. Now,I'llfirst,beforegettingintodetails,makeadefinitionalpoint.WhenI'mtalkingaboutlanguageI'mmeaningsystemslikeEnglishandDutchandWarlpiriandItalianandTurkishandUrduandwhatwe'veseenandheardrightnowinclassinthedemonstrationthatprecededtheformallecture.[Beforeclassstarted,ProfessorBloomhadseveralbilingualstudentsgivedemonstrationsofnon-Englishspeech.]Now,youcoulduselanguageinadifferentsense.Youcouldusetheterm"language"todescribewhatdogsdo,orwhatchimpanzeesdo,orbirds.Youcoulduselanguagetodescribemusic,talkaboutthe--amusicallanguageorart,oranycommunicativesystem,andthere'sactuallynothingwrongwiththat.There'snoruleabouthowyou'resupposedtousetheword"language."Buttheproblemisifyouusetheword"language"impossibly,incrediblybroadly,thenfromascientificpointofviewitbecomesuselesstoaskinterestingquestionsaboutit.IflanguagecanrefertojustabouteverythingfromEnglishtotrafficsignals,thenwe'renotgoingtobeabletofindinterestinggeneralizationsordogoodscienceaboutit. So,whatIwanttodois,Iwanttodiscussthescientificnotionoflanguage,atfirstrestrictingmyselftosystemslikeEnglishandDutchandAmericansignlanguageandNavajoandsoon.Oncewe'vemadesomegeneralizationsaboutlanguageinthisnarrowsense,wecouldthenask,andwewillask,towhatextentdoothersystemssuchasanimalcommunicationsystemsrelatetothisnarrowerdefinition.Sowecouldask,inthisnarrowsense,whatpropertiesdolanguageshaveandthengoontoask,inabroadersense,whatothercommunicativesystemsalsopossessthoseproperties. Well,somethingsareobviousaboutlanguagesoherearesome;herearethequestionswewillask.Thiswillframeourdiscussiontoday.We'llfirstgooversomebasicfactsaboutlanguage.We'lltalkaboutwhatlanguagesshare,we'lltalkabouthowlanguagedevelops,andwe'lltalkaboutlanguageandcommunicationinnonhumans. Ibeganthisclasswithademonstrationof--thatillustratestwoveryimportantfactsaboutlanguage.Oneisthatlanguagesallsharesomedeepandintricateuniversals.Inparticular,alllanguages,atminimum,arepowerfulenoughtoconveyanabstractnotionlikethis;abstractinthesensethatittalksaboutthoughtsandittalksaboutapropositionandspatialrelationsinobjects.There'snolanguageintheworldthatyoujustcannottalkaboutabstractthingswith.Everylanguagecandothis.Butthedemonstration[beforeclass]alsoillustratedanotherfactaboutlanguage,whichishowdifferentlanguagesare.Theysounddifferent.Ifyouknowonelanguage,youdon'tnecessarilyknowanother.It'snotmerelythatyoucan'tunderstandit.Itcouldsoundstrangeorlookunusualinthecaseofasignlanguage.Andso,anyadequatetheoryoflanguagehastoallowforboththecommonalitiesandthedifferencesacrosslanguages.Andthisisthepuzzlefacedbythepsychologyandcognitivescienceoflanguage. Well,let'sstartwithaninterestingclaimaboutlanguagemadebyCharlesDarwin.So,Darwinwrites,"Manhasaninstinctivetendencytospeak,asweseeinthebabbleofouryoungchildren,whilenochildhasaninstinctivetendencytobake,breworwrite."AndwhatDarwinisclaiminghere,andit'sacontroversialandinterestingclaim,isthatlanguageisspecialinthatthere'ssomesortofpropensityorcapacityorinstinctforlanguageunliketheotherexampleshegives.NoteverythingcomesnaturaltousbutDarwinsuggeststhatlanguagedoes. Well,whyshouldwebelievethis? Well,therearesomebasicfactsthatsupportDarwin'sclaim.Foronething,everynormal--everyhumansocietyhaslanguage.Inthecourseoftraveling,culturesencounterotherculturesandtheyoftenencounterculturesthatareverydifferentfromtheirown.Butthroughthecourseofhumanhistory,nobodyhaseverencounteredanothergroupofhumansthatdidnothavealanguage.Doesthisshowthatit'sbuiltin? Well,notnecessarily.Itcouldbeaculturalinnovation.Itcouldbe,forinstance,thatlanguageissuchagoodideathateveryculturecomesacrossitanddevelopsit.Justabouteverycultureusessomesortofutensilstoeatfoodwith,aknifeandafork,chopsticks,aspoon.Thisprobablyisnotbecauseuseofeatingutensilsishumannature,butrather,it'sbecauseit'sjustaveryusefulthingthatculturesdiscoveroverandoveragain.Well,weknowthatthisprobablyisnottruewithregardtolanguage.Andonereasonweknowthisisbecauseofthedemonstratedcasestudieswherealanguageiscreatedwithinasinglegeneration.Andthesecasestudieshavehappenedoverhistory. Thestandardexampleispeopleinvolvedintheslavetrade.Theslavetraderevolvingaroundtobaccoorcottonorcoffeeorsugarwouldtendtomixslavesandlaborersfromdifferentlanguagebackgrounds,inpartdeliberately,soastoavoidthepossibilityofrevolt.Whatwouldhappenisthesepeoplewhowereenslavedfromdifferentcultureswoulddevelopamakeshiftcommunicationsystemsotheycouldtalktooneanother.Andthisiscalleda"pidgin,"p-i-d-g-i-n,apidgin.Andthispidginwashowtheywouldtalk.Andthispidginwasnotalanguage.Itwasstringsofwordsborrowedfromthedifferentlanguagesaroundthemandputtogetherinsortofhaphazardways. Thequestioniswhathappenstothechildrenwhoareraisedinthissociety.Andyoumightexpectitthattheywouldcometospeakapidgin,buttheydon't.Whathappensis,inthecourseofasinglegeneration,theydeveloptheirownlanguage.Theycreatealanguagewithrichsyntaxandmorphologyandphonology,termsthatwe'llunderstandinafewminutes.Andthislanguagethattheycreateiscalleda"creole."Andlanguagesthatweknownowascreoles,thewordrefersbacktotheirhistory.Thatmeansthattheyweredevelopedfrompidgins.Andthisisinterestingbecausethissuggeststhattosomeextenttheabilitytouseandunderstandandlearnlanguageispartofhumannature.Itdoesn'trequireanextensiveculturalhistory.Rather,justaboutanynormalchild,evenwhennotexposedtoafull-fledgedlanguage,cancreatealanguage. Andmorerecently,there'sbeencasestudiesofchildrenwhoacquiresignlanguage.There'sawonderfulcaseinNicaraguainsignlanguagewheretheyacquiresignlanguagefromadultswhothemselvesarenotversedinsignlanguage.They'resortofsecond-languagelearnersstrugglingalong.Whatyoumighthaveexpectedwouldbethechildrenwouldthenusewhateversystemtheiradultsuse,buttheydon't.They"creolized"it.Theytakethismakeshiftcommunicationsystemdevelopedbyadultsand,again,theyturnitintoafull-blownlanguage,suggestingthattosomeextentit'spartofourhumannaturetocreatelanguages. Also,everynormalhumanhaslanguage.Noteverybodyinthisroomcanrideabicycle.Noteverybodyinthisroomcanplaychess.Buteverybodypossessesatleastonelanguage.Andeverybodystartedtopossessatleastonelanguagewhentheywereachild.Thereareexceptions,buttheexceptionscomeaboutduetosomesortofbraindamage.Anyneurologicallynormalhumanwillcometopossessalanguage. Whatelsedoweknow? Well,theclaimthatlanguageispartofhumannatureissupportedbyneurologicalstudies,someofwhichwerereferredtointhechaptersonthebrainthatyoureadearlierthattalkaboutdedicatedpartsofthebrainthatworkforlanguage.Andifpartsofthesebrains--ifparts--ifthesepartsofthebrainaredamagedyougetlanguagedeficitsoraphasiaswhereyoumightlosetheabilitytounderstandorcreatelanguage.Morespeculatively,therehasbeensomefairlyrecentworkstudyingthegeneticbasisoflanguage,lookingatthegenesthataredirectlyresponsibleforthecapacitytolearnanduselanguage.Andonebitofevidencethatthesegenesareimplicatedisthatsomeunfortunatepeoplehavepointmutationsinthesegenes.Andsuchpeopleareunabletolearnanduselanguage. So,ingeneral,thereissomesupport,atleastataverybroadlevel,fortheclaimthatlanguageisinsomesensepartofhumannature.Well,whatdowemeanbylanguage? Whatarewetalkingaboutwhenwetalkaboutlanguage? Wedon'twanttorestrictourselves,forinstance,toEnglishorFrench.Whatdoalllanguagesshare? Well,alllanguagesarecreativeandthismeansacoupleofthings. OnemeaningisthemeaningemphasizedbyReneDescartes.WhenReneDescartesarguedthatwearemorethanmerelymachines,hisbestpieceofevidenceforhimwasthehumancapacityforlanguage.Nomachinecoulddothisbecauseourcapacityforlanguageisunboundedandfree.Wecouldsayanythingwechoosetos
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 心理学 导论 transcript06