山东大学研究生院资助项目.docx
- 文档编号:30742508
- 上传时间:2023-08-20
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:27
- 大小:31.37KB
山东大学研究生院资助项目.docx
《山东大学研究生院资助项目.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《山东大学研究生院资助项目.docx(27页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
山东大学研究生院资助项目
来自:
山东大学研究生院资助项目
(国际经济法教学大纲)(研究生用)
编辑/作者:
法学院网站上传时间:
2012-02-1622:
09:
44访问量:
110
ShandongUniversity
SchoolofLaw,InstituteofInternationalLaw
2011.11.22
姜作利教授博士
Prof.&Dr.JiangZuoli
Tel:
86333313
FortheWholeCourse
Objectives
1.Toprovideanintroductionofvariousthoriesofinternationalbusinesslawandexploretheircalimsintermsofbeingdescriptive(claimingtotellushowthelawis),explanatory(claimingtotelluswhythelawasitis),prescriptive(claimingtotellushowthelawshouldbe),predictive(claimingtotellushowthelawwouldbe)andconstitutive(claimingtotellushowthethoryshapesthewaythelawis)
2.Toprovideacriticaloverviewofsomeofthemajorissuesandconceptsofinternationalbusinesslaw
3.Togivestudentstheopportunitytodevelopamorecriticalawarenessoftheintricacyoflawandtheinternationallegalsystems
4.Tohelpstudentsdevelopskillsofdoinginternationalbusiness
BasicContents
Lecture1Economicglobalization’simpactoninternationalbusinesslaw
Lecture2StateEconomicsovereignty
Lecture3importantissuesinWTOanti-dumpinglaws
Lecture4Characteristicsofinternationaltradecustomsandusages
Lecture5Battleofforms
Lecture6Theseller’sobligationofqualityguaranteeofgoods
Lecture7Theseller’sobligationofguaranteeofrealright
Lecture8calculatingdamagesunderCISG(74-76)
Lecture9passingofrisks
Lecture10excusesfornon-performance
Lecture11internationalagencylaws
Lecture12Natureofbillofladingandfrauds
Lecture13Letterofcreditandfrauds
Lecture14Internationalfactoring
Lecture15InternationalmodellawandUnidroit’sPICC
Lecture16WTOdisputesettlementmechanismanddevelopingcountries
ChapterOneIntroductiontoInternationalBusinessLaw
Objectives
1.Toprovideageneralandbriefsurveyofhistoryandsourcesofinternationalbusinesslaw
2.Togiveageneralintroductiontothemoreimportantinternationalorganizations
3.Tomakeacompasionofmunicipallegalsystems
Basiccontents
1.Theconceptofinternationalbusinesslaw
2.Thehistoryofinternationalbusinesslaw
3.Thesourcesofinternationalbusinesslaw
4.InternationalOrganizations
5.TheRoman-GermanicCivilLawSystemandtheAnglo-AmericanCommonLawSystem
ImportantandDifficultLegalConceptsandIssues
1.InternationalbusinesslawisorignatedincommercialpracticesofEuropeanmerchantsknownasinternationaltradeusagesandpractices
2.Merchantlaw
3.Nationallawisalsoasourceofinternationalbusinesslaw
4.TheRoman-GermanicCivilLawSystemandtheAnglo-AmericanCommonLawSystemaredevelopeddifficultlybutarecomingmoreandmorecloseinrecentdecades
I.WhatisInternationalBusinessLaw
Internationalbusinesslawisthebodyofrulesandnormsthatregulatesactivitiescarriedoutoutsidethelegalboundariesofstates.Inparticular,itregulatesthebusinesstransactionsofprivatepersonsinternationally,andtheinternationalrelationshipsofinternationalcommercialorganizations.
Incomparisonwiththetraditionalinternationalbusinesslaw,contemporaryinternationalbusinesslawcoversmuchmoreextensively,suchaslawfortheinternationaltradingofgoods,companylaw,negotiableinstrumentlaw,maritimelaw,insurancelaw,lawofinternationaltechnologytransfer,industrialpropertylaw,internationalinvestmentlaw,internationalfinanciallaw,internationaltaxlaw,lawofinternationaldisputesettlement.
II.Merchantlaw
Europeanmerchantshavedevelopedmanypracticesandusages,andthecourtsworkedoutpracticalandfairrulesandproceduresbasedonthemerchants’customs.Soonthesesameruleswerebeingappliedbothingovernmentalandchurchcourts,andeventuallythelexmercatoria(商人习惯法)becameaninternationalbodyofgenerallyacceptedcommercialrulesthattranscendednationalboundaries.Italsoprovedtobemoreinfluentialthaneventhecivillaw,spreadingtoEnglandwheretheRomanlawtraditionwasresistedbythelocallegalcommunity.Today,manyoftheconceptscontainedinthelawmerchantareincorporatedinmoderncommerciallawcodes,suchastheUnitedNationsConventiononContractsfortheInternationalSaleofGoods.
III.Internationalmodellaw
Internationalmodellawmeanstherulesandnormsworkedoutandpassedbysomeinternationalorganizationsforthefreechoicebyindividualnations.Internationalmodellawisnotinternationaltreatiesorconventionsandisofnocertainlegalvalidity,however,itincorporatesmanygeneralprinciplesoflawfromvariouslegalsystemsandalsomostwell-knowncustomsandusagesininternationalbusinesspractices.Therefore,manycountriesliketouseitasameansofinterpretinginternationalbusinesscustoms,andasmodelfortheirnationallegislature.So,internationalmodellawisanimportantsourceforinternationalbusinesslaw.
IV.Internationaltradecustomsandusages
Internationaltradecustomsandusagesmeanthegeneralrulesandpracticesininternationaltradeactivitiesthathavebecomegenerallyadoptedthroughunvaryinghabitandcommonuse.“Theexistenceandscopeofausageoftradearetobedeterminedasquestionsoffact.Ifausageisembodiedinawrittentradecodeorsimilarwritingtheinterpretationofthewritingistobedeterminedbythecourtasaquestionoflaw.Unlessotherwiseagreed,ausageoftradeinthevocationortradeinwhichthepartiesareengagedorausageoftradeofwhichtheyknoworhavereasontoknowgivesmeaningtoorsupplementsorqualitiestotheiragreement.”
V.CivilLawandCommonLawSystems
Historically,thecivillawdatesto450B.C,thetraditionaldatewhenRomeadopteditsTwelveTables.Themostsignificanthistoricaleventinthedevelopmentofthecivillaw,however,wasthecompilationandcodificationofallRomanlawdoneunderthedirectionofByzantineEmperorJustinian(A.D.483-565).Thiscode,knownastheCorpusJurisCivilis,wascompiledbetweenA.D.528and534.Itwasimportantbecauseitpreservedtheancientlegalsysteminwrittenforms.TheRomanlawwasdisplacedtosomeextentbytherulesoftheGermanictribeswhentheyoverrantheWesternEmpire.Germanictriballaw,however,recognizedtheprincipleofpersonal(asopposedtoterritorial)law,sotheformerRomansubjectsandtheirdescendantswereallowedtofollowtheRomanlaw.ThemedievalRomanCatholicChurchalsoplayedanimportantroleinpreservingtheancientlawbecauseitsCanonlaw,thelawusedinchurchcourts,wasbasedonRomanlaw.
WiththerevivalofinterestinclassicalcultureinWesternEuropeintheeleventhandtwelfthcenturies,accompaniedbythediscoveryofacopyofthelonglostCorpusJurisCivilis(国法大全),activestudyoftheancientRomanlawbeganinearnest.AtuniversitiesinnorthernItaly—especiallyBologna—theCorpusJurisCiviliswassystematicallyanalyzed,firstbyglossators(whoaddednotes—annotations—explainingitsmeaning)andlaterbycommentators(whoattemptedtoadaptittotheneedsoftheirtime).StudentsfromthroughoutEurope,whotraveledtoItalytostudy,returnedtotheirowncountriestostartthenewprofessionoflawyers.TheynotonlysetupnewuniversitiesinParis,Oxford,Prague,Heidelburg,Cracow,andCoperhagen,butalsofoundworkbothintheChurchandasadvisorstoprincesandmunicipalities.Theircommonbackgroundledtothecreationofanewcivillaw,onebasedontheRomanlaw,canonlaw,andthehugebodyofwritingscreatedbytheglossatorsandcommentators.Thiswascalledthejuscommune,orthecommonlawofEurope.
TheoriginsoftheAnglo-AmericanCommonLawSystemcanbetracedbacktotheyear1066,whentheNormansconqueredEnglandandWilliamtheConquerorbegantocentralizehisnewkingdom’sgovernmentaladministration.Thename“commonlaw”isderivedfromthetheorythattheking’scourtsrepresentedthecommoncustomoftherealm,asopposedtothelocalcustomarylawpracticedinthecountyandmanorialcourts.
DevelopmentoftheenduringprinciplesofthecommonlawwaslargelytheproductofthreecourtscreatedbyHenryII(1133-1189).TheCourtofExchequersettledtaxdisputes;theCourtofCommonPleasdealtwithmattersthatdidnotinvolvetheking’sdirectinterest,suchastitletoland,enforcementofpromises,andpaymentofdebts;andtheCourtofKing’sBenchhandledcasesofadirectroyalinterest,suchastheissuanceof“writs”(writtendecrees)tocontrolunrulypublicofficials.Eventually,thejurisdictionoftheKing’sBenchwasusedtocontrolabusesofpowerbythekinghimself,establishingafundamentaldoctrineofthecommonlaw:
thesupremacyofthelaw.Also,whentheCourtofCommonPleasbegantochargelargefeestohearcases,muchofitsjurisdictionwastakenoverbytheKing’sBench.ThejudgesoftheKing’sBenchdidthisbybroadlyinterpretingthewritoftrespasssothatittookinvirtuallyeverykinkoftort,andbyexpandingthemeaningofthewritofassumpsitsothatitappliedtomostformsofcontracts.
Reviewquestions:
1.Whatismeantbytheterm‘InternationalModelLaw’?
Brieflylistthreeofitsmainfeatures.
2.Explaininternationaltreaties,usingtwoexamples.
3.Outlinethreecircumstancesinwhichinternationaltradecustomsandusagesareeffectivetothepartiestoacontract.
4.CompareandcontrasttheRoman-GermanicCivilLawSystemandtheAnglo-AmericanCommonLawSystem.
5.BrieflydescribehowandwhyChinacametoacceptinternationalbusinesslaw.
6.TheCISGcontainsnoprovisionsthatacontractforthesaleofgoodsbesupportedbyconsideration.Fur
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 山东大学 研究生院 资助 项目