justice2.docx
- 文档编号:29853044
- 上传时间:2023-07-27
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:23
- 大小:27.40KB
justice2.docx
《justice2.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《justice2.docx(23页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
justice2
Lesson2
Lasttime,wearguedaboutthecaseofTheQueenv.Dudley&Stephens,thelifeboatcase,thecaseofcannibalismatsea.
Andwiththeargumentsaboutthelifeboatinmind,theargumentsforandagainstwhatDudleyandStephensdidinmind,let'sturnbacktothephilosophy,theutilitarianphilosophyofJeremyBentham.
BenthamwasborninEnglandin1748.
Attheageof12,hewenttoOxford.
At15,hewenttolawschool.
HewasadmittedtotheBaratage19butheneverpracticedlaw.
Instead,hedevotedhislifetojurisprudenceandmoralphilosophy.
Lasttime,webegantoconsiderBentham'sversionofutilitarianism.
Themainideaissimplystatedandit'sthis:
Thehighestprincipleofmorality,whetherpersonalorpoliticalmorality,istomaximizethegeneralwelfare,orthecollectivehappiness,ortheoverallbalanceofpleasureoverpain;inaphrase,maximizeutility.
Benthamarrivesatthisprinciplebythefollowinglineofreasoning:
We'reallgovernedbypainandpleasure,theyareoursovereignmasters,andsoanymoralsystemhastotakeaccountofthem.
Howbesttotakeaccount?
Bymaximizing.
Andthisleadstotheprincipleofthegreatestgoodforthegreatestnumber.
Whatexactlyshouldwemaximize?
Benthamtellsushappiness,ormoreprecisely,utility-maximizingutilityasaprinciplenotonlyforindividualsbutalsoforcommunitiesandforlegislators."What,afterall,isacommunity?
"Benthamasks.
It'sthesumoftheindividualswhocompriseit.
Andthat'swhyindecidingthebestpolicy,indecidingwhatthelawshouldbe,indecidingwhat'sjust,citizensandlegislatorsshouldaskthemselvesthequestionifweaddupallofthebenefitsofthispolicyandsubtractallofthecosts,therightthingtodoistheonethatmaximizesthebalanceofhappinessoversuffering.
That'swhatitmeanstomaximizeutility.
Now,today,Iwanttoseewhetheryouagreeordisagreewithit,anditoftengoes,thisutilitarianlogic,underthenameofcost-benefitanalysis,whichisusedbycompaniesandbygovernmentsallthetime.
Andwhatitinvolvesisplacingavalue,usuallyadollarvalue,tostandforutilityonthecostsandthebenefitsofvariousproposals.
Recently,intheCzechRepublic,therewasaproposaltoincreasetheexcisetaxonsmoking.
PhilipMorris,thetobaccocompany,doeshugebusinessintheCzechRepublic.
Theycommissionedastudy,acost-benefitanalysisofsmokingintheCzechRepublic,andwhattheircost-benefitanalysisfoundwasthegovernmentgainsbyhavingCzechcitizenssmoke.
Now,howdotheygain?
It'struethattherearenegativeeffectstothepublicfinanceoftheCzechgovernmentbecausethereareincreasedhealthcarecostsforpeoplewhodevelopsmoking-relateddiseases.
Ontheotherhand,therewerepositiveeffectsandthosewereaddedupontheothersideoftheledger.
Thepositiveeffectsincluded,forthemostpart,varioustaxrevenuesthatthegovernmentderivesfromthesaleofcigaretteproducts,butitalsoincludedhealthcaresavingstothegovernmentwhenpeopledieearly,pensionsavings--youdon'thavetopaypensionsforaslong-andalso,savingsinhousingcostsfortheelderly.
Andwhenallofthecostsandbenefitswereaddedup,thePhilipMorrisstudyfoundthatthereisanetpublicfinancegainintheCzechRepublicof$147,000,000,andgiventhesavingsinhousing,inhealthcare,andpensioncosts,thegovernmentenjoyssavingsofover$1,200foreachpersonwhodiesprematurelyduetosmoking.
Cost-benefitanalysis.
Now,thoseamongyouwhoaredefendersofutilitarianismmaythinkthatthisisanunfairtest.
PhilipMorriswaspilloriedinthepressandtheyissuedanapologyforthisheartlesscalculation.
Youmaysaythatwhat'smissinghereissomethingthattheutilitariancaneasilyincorporate,namelythevaluetothepersonandtothefamiliesofthosewhodiefromlungcancer.
Whataboutthevalueoflife?
Somecost-benefitanalysesincorporateameasureforthevalueoflife.
OneofthemostfamousoftheseinvolvedtheFordPintocase.
Didanyofyoureadaboutthat?
Thiswasbackinthe1970s.
DoyourememberwhattheFordPintowas,akindofcar?
Anybody?
Itwasasmallcar,subcompactcar,verypopular,butithadoneproblem,whichisthefueltankwasatthebackofthecarandinrearcollisions,thefueltankexplodedandsomepeoplewerekilledandsomeseverelyinjured.
VictimsoftheseinjuriestookFordtocourttosue.
Andinthecourtcase,itturnedoutthatFordhadlongsinceknownaboutthevulnerablefueltankandhaddoneacost-benefitanalysistodeterminewhetheritwouldbeworthittoputinaspecialshieldthatwouldprotectthefueltankandpreventitfromexploding.
Theydidacost-benefitanalysis.
ThecostperparttoincreasethesafetyofthePinto,theycalculatedat$11.00perpart.
Andhere's--thiswasthecost-benefitanalysisthatemergedinthetrial.
Elevendollarsperpartat12.5millioncarsandtruckscametoatotalcostof$137milliontoimprovethesafety.
Butthentheycalculatedthebenefitsofspendingallthismoneyonasafercarandtheycounted180deathsandtheyassignedadollarvalue,$200,000perdeath,andthenthecoststorepair,105thereplacementcostfor2,000vehicles,itwouldbedestroyedwithoutthesafetydevice$700pervehicle.
Sothebenefitsturnedouttobeonly$49.5millionandsotheydidn'tinstallthedevice.
Needlesstosay,whenthismemooftheFordMotorCompany'scost-benefitanalysiscameoutinthetrial,itappalledthejurors,whoawardedahugesettlement.
Isthisacounterexampletotheutilitarianideaofcalculating?
BecauseFordincludedameasureofthevalueoflife.
Now,whoherewantstodefendcost-benefitanalysisfromthisapparentcounterexample?
Whohasadefense?
Ordoyouthinkthiscompletelydestroysthewholeutilitariancalculus?
Yes?
Well,Ithinkthatonceagain,they'vemadethesamemistakethepreviouscasedid,thattheyassignedadollarvaluetohumanlife,andonceagain,theyfailedtotakeaccountthingslikesufferingandemotionallossesbythefamilies.
Imean,familieslostearningsbuttheyalsolostalovedoneandthatismorevaluedthan$200,000.
Rightand--wait,wait,wait,that'sgood.What'syourname?
JulieRoteau.
Soif$200,000,Julie,istoolowafigurebecauseitdoesn'tincludethelossofalovedoneandthelossofthoseyearsoflife,whatwouldbe-whatdoyouthinkwouldbeamoreaccuratenumber?
Idon'tbelieveIcouldgiveanumber.
Ithinkthatthissortofanalysisshouldn'tbeappliedtoissuesofhumanlife.
Ithinkitcan'tbeusedmonetarily.
Sotheydidn'tjustputtoolowanumber,Juliesays.
Theywerewrongtotrytoputanynumberatall.
Allright,let'shearsomeonewho-Youhavetoadjustforinflation.
Youhavetoadjustforinflation.
Allright,fairenough.
Sowhatwouldthenumberbenow?
Thiswas35yearsago.
Twomilliondollars.
Twomilliondollars?
Youwouldputtwomillion?
Andwhat'syourname?
VoytekVoyteksayswehavetoallowforinflation.
Weshouldbemoregenerous.
Thenwouldyoubesatisfiedthatthisistherightwayofthinkingaboutthequestion?
Iguess,unfortunately,itisfor-thereneedstobeanumberputsomewhere,like,I'mnotsurewhatthatnumberwouldbe,butIdoagreethattherecouldpossiblybeanumberputonthehumanlife.
Allright,soVoyteksays,andhere,hedisagreeswithJulie.
Juliesayswecan'tputanumberonhumanlifeforthepurposeofacost-benefitanalysis.
Voyteksayswehavetobecausewehavetomakedecisionssomehow.
Whatdootherpeoplethinkaboutthis?
Isthereanyonepreparedtodefendcost-benefitanalysishereasaccurateasdesirable?
Yes?
Goahead.
IthinkthatifFordandothercarcompaniesdidn'tusecost-benefitanalysis,they'deventuallygooutofbusinessbecausetheywouldn'tbeabletobeprofitableandmillionsofpeoplewouldn'tbeabletousetheircarstogettojobs,toputfoodonthetable,tofeedtheirchildren.
SoIthinkthatifcost-benefitanalysisisn'temployed,thegreatergoodissacrificed,inthiscase.
Allright,letmeadd.
What'syourname?
Raul.
Raul,therewasrecentlyastudydoneaboutcellphoneusebyadriverwhenpeoplearedrivingacar,andtherewasadebatewhetherthatshouldbebanned.
Yeah.
Andthefigurewasthatsome2,000peopledieasaresultofaccidentseachyearusingcellphones.
Andyet,thecost-benefitanalysiswhichwasdonebytheCenterforRiskAnalysisatHarvardfoundthatifyoulookatthebenefitsofthecellphoneuseandyouputsomevalueonthelife,itcomesoutaboutthesamebecauseoftheenormouseconomicbenefitofenablingpeopletotakeadvantageoftheirtime,notwastetime,beabletomakedealsandtalktofriendsandsoonwhilethey'redriving.
Doesn'tthatsuggestthatit'samistaketotrytoputmonetaryfiguresonquestionsofhumanlife?
Well,Ithinkthatifthegreatmajorityofpeopletrytoderivemaximumutilityoutofaservice,likeusingcellphonesandtheconveniencethatcellphonesprovide,thatsacrificeisnecessaryforsatisfactiontooccur.
You'reanoutrightutilitarian.
Yes.Okay.
Allrightthen,onelastquestion,Raul.-Okay.
AndIputthistoVoytek,whatdollarfigureshouldbeputonhumanlifetodecidewhethertobantheuseofcellphones?
Well,Idon'twanttoarbitrarilycalculateafigure,Imean,rightnow.
Ithinkthat-Youwanttotakeitunderadvisement?
Yeah,I'lltakeitunderadvisement.
Butwhat,roughlyspeaking,woulditbe?
Yougot2,300deaths.-Okay.
Yougottoassignadollarvaluetoknowwhetheryouwanttopreventthosedeathsbybanningtheuseofcellphonesincars.-Okay.
Sowhatwouldyourhunchbe?
Howm
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- justice2
![提示](https://static.bdocx.com/images/bang_tan.gif)