美国大城市的生与死.docx
- 文档编号:28897313
- 上传时间:2023-07-20
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:8
- 大小:23.54KB
美国大城市的生与死.docx
《美国大城市的生与死.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《美国大城市的生与死.docx(8页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
美国大城市的生与死
«美国大城市的生与死»
(THEDEATHANDLIFEOFGREATAMRICANCITIES)
美国女作家简.雅各布斯(JaneJacobs)
节选
1Introduction
(1)Thisbookisandattackoncityplanningandrebuilding.Itisalso,andmostly,anattempttointroducenewprinciplesofcityplanningandrebuilding,differentandevenoppositefromthosenowtaughtineverythingfromschoolsofarchitectureandplanningtotheSundaysupplementsandwomen’smagazines.Myattackisnotbasedonquibblesaboutrebuildingmethodsorhairsplittingaboutfashionsindesign.Itisanattack,rather,ontheprinciplesandaimsthathaveshapedmodern,orthodoxcityplanningandrebuilding.
(2)Insettingforthdifferentprinciples,Ishallmainlybewritingaboutcommon,ordinarythings:
forinstance,whatkindsofcitystreetsaresafeandwhatkindsarenot;whysomecityparksaremarvelousandothersarevicetrapsanddeathtraps;whysomeslumsstayslumsandotherslumsregeneratethemselvesevenagainstfinancialandofficialopposition;whatmakesdowntownsshifttheircenters;what,ifanything,isacityneighborhood,andwhatjobs,ifany,neighborhoodsingreatcitiesdo.Inshort,Ishallbewritingabouthowcitiesworkinreallife,becausethisistheonlywaytolearnwhatprinciplesofplanningandwhatpracticesinrebuildingcanpromotesocialandeconomicvitalityincities,andwhatpracticesandprinciplewilldeadentheseattributes.
(3)Thereisawistfulmyththatifonlywehadenoughmoneytospend—thefigureisusuallyputatahundredbilliondollars—wecouldwipeoutallourslumsintenyears,reversedecayinthegreat,dull,graybeltsthatwereyesterday’sandday-before-yesterday’ssuburbs,anchorthewanderingmiddleclassanditswanderingtaxmoney,andperhapsevensolvethetrafficeproblem.
(4)Butlookwhatwehavebuiltwiththefirstseveralbillions:
Low-incomeprojectsthatbecomeworsecentersofdelinquency,vandalismandgeneralsocialhopelessnessthantheslumstheyweresupposedtoreplace.Middle-incomehousingprojectswhicharetrulymarvelsofdullnessandregimentationsealedagainstanybuoyancyorvitalityofcitylife.Luxuryhousingprojectsthatmitigatetheirinanity,ortryto,withavapidvulgarity.Culturalcentersthatareunabletosupportagoodbookstore.Civiccentersthatareavoidedbyeveryonebutbums,whohavefewerchoicesofloiteringplacethanothers.Commercialcentersthatarelacklusterimitationsofstandardizedsuburbanchain-storeshopping.Promenadesthatgofromnoplacetonowhereandhavenopromenaders..Expresswaysthateviscerategreatcities.Thisisnottherebuildingofcities.Thisisthesackingofcities.
(5)Underthesurface,theseaccomplishmentsproveevenpoorerthantheirpoorpretenses.Theyseldomaidthecityareasaroundthem,asintheorytheyaresupposedto.Theseamputatedareastypicallydevelopgallopinggangrene.Tohousepeopleinthisplannedfashion,pricetagsarefastenedonthepopulation,andeachsorted-outchunkofprice-taggedpopulacelivesingrowingsuspicionandtensionagainstthesurroundingcity.Whentwoormoresuchhostileislandsarejuxtaposedtheresultiscalled“abalancedneighborhood.”Monopolisticshoppingcentersandmonumentalculturalcenterscloak,underthepublicrelationshoohaw,thesubtractionofcommerce,andofculturetoo,fromtheintimateandcasuallifeofcities.
(6)Thatsuchwondersmaybeaccomplished,peoplewhogetmarkedwiththeplanners’hexsignsarepushedabout,expropriated,anduprootedmuchasiftheywerethesubjectsofaconqueringpower.Thousandsofsmallbusinessesaredestroyed,andtheirproprietorsruined,withhardlyagestureatcompensation.Wholecommunitiesaretornapartandsowntothewinds,withareapingofcynicism,resentmentanddespairthatmustbeheardandseentobebelieved.AgroupofclergymeninChicago,appalledatthefruitsofplannedcityrebuildingthere,ask,
(7)CouldjobhavebeenthinkingofChicagowhenhewrote:
(8)Herearementhataltertheirneighbor’slandmark…shoulderthepooraside,conspiretooppressthefriendless.
(9)Reaptheythefieldthatisnoneoftheirs,striptheythevineyardwrongfullyseizedfromitsowner…
(10)Acrygoesupfromthecitystreets,wherewoundedmenliegroaning…
(11)Ifso,hewasalsothinkingofNewYork,Philadelphia,Boston,Washington,St.Louis,SanFranciscoandanumberofotherplaces.Theeconomicrationaleofcurrentcityrebuildingisahoax.Theeconomicsofcityrebuildingdonotrestsoundlyonreasonedinvestmentofpublictaxsubsides,asurbanrenewaltheoryproclaims,butalsoonvast,involuntarysubsideswrungoutofhelplesssitevictims.Andtheincreasedtaxreturnsfromsuchsites,accruingtothecitiesasaresultofthis“investment,”areamirage,apitifulgestureagainsttheeverincreasingsumsofpublicmoneyneededtocombatdisintegrationandinstabilitythatflowfromthecruellyshaken-upcity.Themeanstoplannedcityrebuildingareasdeplorableastheend.
(12)Meantime,alltheartandscienceofcityplanningarehelplesstostemdecay—andthespiritlessnessthatprecedesdecay—inevermoremassiveswatchesofcities.Norcanthisdecaybelaid,reassuringly,tolackofopportunitytoapplytheartsofplanning.Itseemstomatterlittlewhethertheyareappliedornot.ConsidertheMorningsideHeightsareainNewYorkCity.Accordingtoplanningtheoryitshouldnotbeintroubleatall,foritenjoysagreataboudanceofparkland,campus,playgroundandpleasantgroundwithmagnificentriverviews.Itisafamouseducationalcenterwithsplendidinstitutions—ColumbiaUniversity,UnionTheologicalSeminary,theJuilliardSchoolofMusic,andhalfadozenothersofeminentrespectability.Itisthebeneficiaryofgoodhospitalsandchurches.Ithasnoindustries.Itsstreetsarezonedinthemainagainst“incompatibleuses“intrudingintothepreservesforsolidlyconstructed,roomy,middle-andupper-classapartments.Yetbytheearly1950’sMorningsideHeightswasbecomingaslumsoswiftly,thesurlykindofsluminwhichpeoplefeartowalkthestreets,thatthesituationposedacrisisfortheinstitutions.Theyandtheplanningarmsofthecitygovernmentgottogether,appliedmoreplanningtheory,wipedoutthemostrun-downpartoftheareaandbuiltinitssteadamiddle-incomehousingprojectcompletewithshoppingcenter,andapublichousingproject,allinterspersedwithair,light,sunshineandlandscaping.Thiswashailedasagreatdemonstrationincitysaving.
(13)Afterthat,MorningsideHeightswentdownhillevenfaster.
(14)Noristhisanunfairorirrelevantexample.Incityaftercity,preciselythewrongareas,inthelightofplanningtheory,aredecaying.Lessnoticed,butequallysignificant,incityaftercitythewrongareas,inthelightofplanningtheory,arerefusingtodecay.
(15)Citiesareanimmenselaboratoryoftrialanderror,failureandsuccess,incitybuildingandcitydesign.Thisisthelaboratoryinwhichcityplanningshouldhavebeenlearningandforminganddiscipline(ifsuchitcanbecalled)haveignoredthestudyofsuccessandfailureinreallife,havebeenincuriousaboutthereasonsforunexpectedsuccess,andareguidedinsteadbyprinciplesderivedfromthebehaviorandappearanceoftowns,suburbs,tuberculosissanatoria,fairs,andimaginarydreamcities—fromanythingbutcitiesthemselves.
(16)Ifitappearsthattherebuiltportionsofcitiesandtheendlessnewdevelopmentsspreadingbeyondthecitiesarethereducingcityandcountrysidealiketoamonotonous,unnourishinggruel,thisisnotstrange,Itallcomes,first-,second-third-orfourth-hand,outofthesameintellectualdishormush,amushinwhichthequalities,necessities,advantagesandbehaviorofgreatcitieshavebeenbehaviorofotherandmoreinerttypesofsettlements.
(17)Thereisnothingeconomicallyorsociallyinevitableabouteitherthedecayofoldcitiesorthefresh-minteddecadenceofthenewunurbanurbanization.Onthecontrarynootheraspectofoureconomyandsocietyhasbeenmorepurposefullymanipulatedforafullquarterofacenturytoachievepreciselywhatwearegetting.Extraordinarygovernmentalfinancialincentiveshavebeenrequiretoachievethisdegreeofmonotony,sterilityandvulgarity.Decadesofpreaching,writingandexhortingbyexpertshavegoneintoconvincingusandourlegislatorsthatmushlikethismustbegoodforus,aslongasitcomesbeddedwithgrass.
(18)Automobilesareoftenconvenientlytaggedasthevillainsresponsiblefortheillsofcitiesandthedisappointmentsandfutilitiesofcityplanning.Butthedestructiveeffectsofautomobilesaremuchlessacausethanasymptomofourincompetenceatcitybuilding.Ofcauseplanners,includingthehighwaymenwithfabuloussumsofmoneyandenormouspowerattheirdisposal,areatalosstomakeautomobilesandcitiescompatiblewithoneanother.Theydonotknowwhattodowithautomobilesincitiesbecausetheydonotknowhowtoplanforworkableandvitalcitiesanyhow—withorwithoutautomobiles.
译文:
介绍
(1)这是一本抨击现今城市规划和改造的书。
应该说书中的大多数内容,尝试着介绍新的城市规划和改造原则,这些原则不同于学校里所传授的东西,不同于周日特刊的计划,也不同于从妇女杂志中所看到的,甚至是与那些原则完全相反的。
我的抨击并不是以关于改建手法的模棱两可的双关语为基础,也不是对设计的时尚吹毛求疵。
它所抨击的是那些形成现代和传统城市规划和改造的原则和目的。
(2)为了阐明这些不同的原则,我从那些普通的事物写起:
例如,什么样的城市街道是安全的,而什么样的是不安全的;为什么有的城市公园是美妙的不可思议的,而有的则成为了城市藏污纳垢的死角;为什么有些贫民窟长久保持原样有些不顾财政和政府的反对不断生成;是什么让城市不断变换他们的中心;什么是一个城市的临近地区,它有担当了什么样的一种职能。
简而言之,我要写的是城市在现实生活中是如何运作的,因为这是学习规划原则和怎样用改建来提升城市的社会和经济活力的唯一方法,通过这样的学习,也能知道什么样的原则和实践会扼杀这些活力。
(3)有一种理想的“神话”,前提是我们拥有足够的资金——通常得上百亿美金——我们便可在十年内清除所有的贫困区,隐藏起从前城市中那些庞大、阴暗、沉闷地带内所呈现出的衰败景象,转而安置飘泊的中产阶级,沉淀及其附带的游离资金,这样甚至可以解决交通问题。
(4)现在看看我们用一开始的几十亿作了什么:
低收入居民区变成了错误,破坏艺术行为和社会绝望的中心,代替了贫民窟给社会带来的影响。
中层收入居民区的无趣和对一切轻快和有活力的城市生活的管辖让人觉得惊奇。
奢华的小别墅妄图用一种粗俗的设计手法区减轻他们的愚蠢。
文化中心里
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 美国 大城市