Analysis of the Criminal Procedure Law Civil Procedure modifications of legislative language specifi.docx
- 文档编号:25266011
- 上传时间:2023-06-06
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:6
- 大小:18.36KB
Analysis of the Criminal Procedure Law Civil Procedure modifications of legislative language specifi.docx
《Analysis of the Criminal Procedure Law Civil Procedure modifications of legislative language specifi.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Analysis of the Criminal Procedure Law Civil Procedure modifications of legislative language specifi.docx(6页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
AnalysisoftheCriminalProcedureLawCivilProceduremodificationsoflegislativelanguagespecifi
AnalysisoftheCriminalProcedureLawCivilProceduremodificationsoflegislativelanguagespecification
Abstractsappropriatelegislativelanguagetobuildareasonable,logicalstructure,andexpressionoftheappropriatelegal,andmoreconducivetotheapplicationofthelaw.CriminalProcedureLaw,CivilProcedureLawoftheabsorbedCriminalmodify,practicalexperienceandtheoreticalcivilactionsummaryforourcriminallitigation,civillitigation,actualembodiestheresultsofourcriminal,civilreform.However,modificationsoftheCriminalProcedureLaw,CivilProcedureLawinthelegislativelanguage,therearestillsomeneedtobeimproved,suchasthetheunificationofthelegislativeframework,thelogicofthelegislativelanguagesemantics,etc.Thispaperattemptstocarryouttheanalysisoftheseissues,andputforwardanumberofrecommendations.
ThePaperKeywordsCriminalProcedureLawCivilProcedurelegislativelanguage
March14,2012,thefifthsessionoftheEleventhNationalPeople’sCongressexaminedandadoptedthedecisionoftheNationalPeople’sCongressonAmendingtheCodeofCriminalProcedure,PresidentHuJintaoofthePeople’sRepublicofChinasignedthePresidentialDecreeof55,announcedthedecision,effectiveasofJanuary1,2013toAugust31.2012years,thetwenty-eighthofthe11thStandingCommitteeoftheNationalPeople’sCongressvotebythedecisionoftheStandingCommitteeoftheNationalPeople’sCongressonAmendingtheCivilProcedureLaw,since2013effectivedateofJanuarythispoint,modifythedurationofthelong,wide-rangingcomments,viewpointsdiscusstwofierceProcedureLawmodifyfinallysettled,butbasedontheCriminalProcedureLaw,CivilProcedureLawtomodifyarousedtheoscillationandEnforcementwillproducefar-reachingimpactofitsresearchamongscholarsisintheascendant.
DiscussionandaftertheimplementationoftheCriminalProcedureLaw,CivilProceduremodifiedresearchscholarsfocusmainlymodifytheguidingideology,basicprinciples,thebasicsystemandotherspecificissues,fromthepointofviewofthelegislativelanguagestudysmaller,morerepresentative<<OnChina’sCriminalProcedureLawofthelegislativelanguageperfect>><<legislativelanguageandlogicspecification-CodeofCriminalProcedurefortherawmaterials>><<<CivilProcedureLaw>improperuseofmicro-probe>>language>><<definitionofthetermsoftheCivilProcedureLaw.
Thelegislativelanguageisthelanguageusedbythelegislatorsinthelegislativeprocess,thetextaswellasthelanguageofthelawmustfollow.Legislatorslegislativeintent,legislativepurposemustbereflectedinthelegislativelanguage.Appropriatelegislativelanguagetobeabletobuildareasonablestructure,logicrigorous,appropriatelegalexpressioninappropriatelegislativelanguagewillaffectanapplicablelegalandacademicvalues,andevenleadtoambiguityandcontroversy.therefore,thelegislativequalificationstoattachimportancetothestudyofthelegislativelanguageinthelegislativework,inLegalDraftingmakingprocesstoseektheviewsoflinguists.
Accordingly,theauthorintendstocombinethebeforeandaftermodificationoftheCriminalProcedureLaw,CivilProcedureLawofthespecificlawarticle,fromtheperspectiveofnormativestructure,logic,terminologyandexpressiondosomepreliminaryexploreandsuggestamendments.
CriminalProcedureLaw,CivilProcedureLawinthesameorsimilarchaptersexistdifferentlegislativeframework,itisrecommendedthataunified
Legislativeframeworkreferstothecontentsofthelegalstructurearrangements.Legislativeframeworkisatechnicalproblem,handledwell,notonlyconducivetothesmoothintroductionofthelaw,ismoreconducivetotheunderstandingandimplementationofthelaw.
ModificationsoftheCriminalProcedureLaw,CivilProcedureLaw,oneofthetheevidencepartarethefocus.ModificationsoftheCriminalProcedureLaw,thedefinitionofallthefactsfromtheoriginal“provethetruecircumstancesoftheevidence,alltheevidence”waschangedto“materialsthatcanbeusedtoprovethefactsofthecase,areevidenceof”thekindofevidencefromtheoriginal“evidencethefollowingsevencategories:
(aphysicalevidence,documentaryevidence,(btestimonyofwitnesses,(thethreevictims’statements,(ivsuspectsconfessionoftheaccusedandtheexcuse,(fiveexpertconclusions,(frecordofinspection,(viiaudio-visualmaterials.“modify”evidenceincluding:
(aphysicalevidence(documentaryevidence,(ctestimonyofwitnesses,(dvictims’statements,(fivesuspects,theconfessionoftheaccusedandtheexcuse(sixexpertopinion,(ginquest,inspection,identification,investigativeexperimentstranscripts,(eightaudio-visualmaterials,electronicdata“aftertheCriminalProcedureLawtomodifythetypeofevidencefromsevenclassintoeightcategories,thebreakdownofthephysicalevidenceanddocumentaryevidence,anincreaseofelectronicdata.
ModificationsofCivilProcedure,thetypesofevidencefromtheoriginal“evidenceofthefollowing:
(adocumentaryevidence,(bevidence(audio-visualmaterials,(dtestimonyofwitnesses,(estatementsoftheparties,(sixexpertconclusions(viirecordsofinquests.revisedtoevidenceincludes:
(astatementoftheparties,(iidocumentaryevidence,(cphysicalevidence,(fouraudio-visualmaterials,(vElectronicData(sixwitnessestestimony,(7expertopinion,(viiisurveyinspectionrecord.CivilProceduremodifythetypesofevidencefromsevencategoriesintoeightcategories,adjusttheorderofthetypesofevidence,electronicdataandtiedwithsevenothertypesofevidence,includingphysicaldata,including
AftereditingtheCriminalProcedureLaw,CivilProcedureLawoftheelectronicdataclearlyevidenceadifferentmodifyaftertheCriminalProcedureLawistiedfortheelectronicdataandaudio-visualmaterials,modifiedaftertheCivilProcedureelectronicdataaudio-visualmaterialsinwithintiedsevenothertypesofevidenceincriminallitigation,civillitigationpracticeandtheoreticalresearch,themeaningofelectronicdata,thescopeandthemainformofnodifference,thedifferenceliesinthewaytoobtainelectronicdataasevidencereviewjudgmentstandardsandtheCriminalProcedureLawoftheoriginaldocumentaryevidence,physicalevidencetiedamendedasbreakdown,madeanagreementwiththeCivilProcedureonthedocumentaryevidence,physicalevidenceoftherelationshipbetweenprocessingTherefore,theCriminalProcedureLaw,CivilProcedureLawinthesameorsimilarchapterstherearedifferentlegislativeframework,epitomizedbytherelationshipbetweentherelationshipbetweenelectronicdataandaudio-visualmaterials,aswellaswithothertypesofevidence.
LinkstofreepapersDownloadCenter
Second,thelegislativelanguageinsemanticlogicalinconsistencies,theneedtoreviseandimprovethe
Legislativelanguageservicestothelegislativeintentofthelegislators,legislativepolicyrecordandexpressservicesaccuratelypassthelegislativeintentandlegislativepolicy.Mr.LiangQichaohaspointedout:
“Therearethreeelementstothedictionofthelaw,aYueming,secondiscorrect,thirdelasticity.cleartheuseoftheFrenchlanguage,theelasticityFrenchcontainedinthemeaningofwords.“universallawforallmembersofsociety,lawisexpressedthroughlanguageifthelanguageusedinthelegislationnotstandardized,notrigorouslogic,chaoswillinevitablyleadtotheapplicationofthelaw.
AbsorbthefruitsofChina’sprogressinhumanrights,therevisedCriminalProcedureLawwillrespectandprotectionofhumanrightsasthebasicprinciplesofourcriminalprocedurethatmustbefollowed,andbereflectedintherelevantprovisionsofArticle50.:
“Thejudges,procuratorsandinvestigatorsmustbeinaccordancewithlegalprocedures,collectingcanprovethesuspect,thedefendant’sguiltorinnocence,alltheevidenceofthegravityofhiscrime.strictlyforbiddentoextortconfessionsbytortureandtocollectevidencebythreat,enticement,deceitorotherunlawfulmethods,maynotforceanyonetoconfirmhisguiltmustbeguaranteedforallcitizensorlearningthefactsofthecaserelatingtothecase,toobjectivelyandfullyfurnishevidenceconditions,exceptinspecialcircumstances,theymaybebroughttoassistintheinvestigation.“thatonthebasisoftheoriginalcriminalprocedurallawtortureisstrictlyprohibited.plusanypersonshallbecompelledself-incrimination.additiontotheirfrankly,cannotbeenforced.theOralEvidenceforcedout,youalwayswanttoexclude.
Anypersoncannotberequiredtoprovetheirownguilt,andreflectsthespiritofhumanrights,inlinewiththespiritofChina’saccessiontotherelevantinternationalconventions.<<CivilRightsandPoliticalRightsandtheInternationalCovenanton>>theprovisionsofArticle14,paragraph3:
“Donotbeforcedtomakenotconducivetohisowntestimonyortoconfessguilt.“Inaddition,theUnitedNationsthejuvenilejusticeStandardMinimumRules>><<(<<BeijingRules>>provides:
”Theprosecutionofpeopleenjoytherighttonotbeforcedself-incrimination.
However,themodificationsaftertheCriminalProcedureLawArticle118,firstparagraph:
“investigatorsatthetimeoftheinterrogationofcriminalsuspects,shouldfirstaskwhetherthesuspectshavecommittedacrime,hisstatementtheplotofguiltorinnocence,thenhequestionssuspectsinvestigato
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- Analysis of the Criminal Procedure Law Civil modifications legislative language specifi
链接地址:https://www.bdocx.com/doc/25266011.html