考研语言学复习资料.docx
- 文档编号:24338331
- 上传时间:2023-05-26
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:28
- 大小:33.89KB
考研语言学复习资料.docx
《考研语言学复习资料.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《考研语言学复习资料.docx(28页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
考研语言学复习资料
Transformational-generativegrammar:
inthe1950stheschooloflinguisticthoughtknownastransformational-generativegrammarreceivedwideacclaimthroughtheworksofNoamChomsky.Chomshypostulatedasyntacticbaseoflanguage(calleddeepstructure),whichconsistsofaseriesofphrase-structurerewriterules,i.e.,aseriesof(possiblyuniversal)rulesthatgeneratestheunderlyingphrase-structureofasentence,andaseriesofrules(calledtransformations)thatactuponthephrase-structuretoformmoreconplexsentences.Theendresultofatransformational-generativegrammarisasurfacestructurethat,aftertheadditionofwordsandpronunciations,isidenticaltoanactualsentenceofalanguage.Alllanguageshavethesamedeepstructure,buttheydifferfromeachotherinsurfacestructurebecauseoftheapplicationofdifferentrulesfortransformations,pronunciation,andwordinsertion.Anotherimportantdistinctionmadeintransformational-generativegrammaristhedifferencebetweenlanguagecompetence(thesubconsciouscontrolofalinguisticsystem)andlanguageperformance(thespeaker’sactualuseoflanguage).Althoughthefirstworkdoneintransformational-generativegrammarwassyntactic,laterstudieshaveappliedthetheory,tothephonologicalandsemanticcomponentsoflanguage.
Conceptualism:
conceptualismisbasedonthepresumptionthatonecanderivemeaningfrom,orreduceitto,observablecontext:
the“situationalcontext”andthe“linguisticcontext”.Everyutteranceoccursinaparticularspatial-temporalsituation,asthefollowingfactorsarerelatedtothesituationalcontext:
(1)thespeakerandthehearer;
(2)theactionstheyareperformingatthetime;(3)variousexternalobjectsandevents;(4)deicticfeatures.The“linguisticcontext”isanotheraspectofconceptualism.Itconsiderstheprobabilityofoneword’sco-occurrenceorcollocationwithanother,whichformspartofthemeaning,andanimportantfactorincommunication.
Complementarity:
complementaritymayberegardedasspecialcaseofincampatibilityholdingovertwo-termsets.Itischaracteristicofsuchparisoflexicalitemsthattheapprovalofoneimpliesthedenialoftheother.Inotherwords,itisnotamatterofdegreebetweentwoextremes,butamatterofeitheroneortheother.Forexample,apersoncanbeeither“alive”or“dead”,either“male”or“female”;thereisnothirdpossibility.
TheSapir-Whorfhypothesis:
inthediscussionabouttherelationshipbetweenlanguageandculture,oneoftheessentialissuesisthatbetweenlanguageandthought.EdwardSapirandBenjaminWhorf,throughtheirstudiesofAmericanIndianlanguages,proclaimedthatthestructureofthelanguagepeoplehabituallyuseinfluencedthewaystheythinkandbehave.Thatistosay,differentlanguagesofferpeopledifferentwaysofexpressiontheworldaround,theythinkandspeakdifferently,thisisalsoknownaslinguisticrelativity.SapirandWhorfbelievethatlanguagefilterspeople’sperceptionandthewaytheycategorizeexperiences.ThisinterdependenceoflanguageandthoughtisnowknownasSair-Whorfhypothesis.Thehypothesisisnowinterpretedmainlyintwodifferentways:
astrongversionandaweakone.Whilethestrongversionbelievesthatthelanguagepatternsdeterminepeople’sthinkingandbehavior,theweakoneholdsthattheformerinfluencethelatter.Sofar,manyresearchesandexperimentsconductedinvariousdisciplinesprovidesupporttotheweakversion.Thestudieshaveshednewlightonourunderstandingofthehypothesis:
peopletendtosortoutanddistinguishexperiencesdifferentlyaccordingtothesemanticcategoriesprovidedbytheirdifferentcodes.ThestudyofthelinguisticrelativityorSapir-Whorfhypothesishasshedlightontwoimportantinsights:
Thereisnowadaysrecognitionthatlanguage,asacode,reflectsculturalandpreoccupationsandconstrainsthewaypeoplethink.EveninWhorf’sdays,however,werecognizehowimportantcontextisincomplementingthemeaningsencodedinthelanguage.
Backwasheffect:
thistermdescribestheeffectoftestingonteaching.Backwashcanbeharmfulorbeneficial.Positivebackwashhappensehenstudentsstudyandlearnthosethingswhichteachersintendthemtostudyandlearn.Ontheotherhand,negativebackwashmeanstheconverse.Forexample,ifteachersmeasurewritingskillsonlythroughmultiple-choiceitems,thentherewillbepressuretopracticesuchitems,ratherthanwritingitself.Inthiscase,thebackwashwouldbenegative.
Structuralistlinguistics:
structuralistlinguisticsisaprincipallyAmericanphenomenonofthemid-20thcentury,typifiedbytheworkofLeonardBloomfield,whodrewonideasofthebehavioristschoolofpsychology.Thestructuralistsareprimarilyconcernedwithphonology,morphology,andsyntax.Theyfoucesonthephysicalfeaturesofutteranceswithlittleregardformeaningorlexicon.Sructuralistlinguisticsdescribeslinguisticfeaturesintermsofstructuresandsystems.Dissatisfiedwithtraditionalgrammar,structuralistgrammatsetsouttodescribethecurrentspokenlanguagewhichpeopleuseincommunication.Forthefirsttime,structuralistgrammarprovidesdescriptionofphonologicalsystemswhichaidsthesystemaicteachingofpronunciation.However,liketraditionalgrammar,thefocusofsturcruralistgrammarisstillonthegrammaticalstructuresofalanguage.
Whatismorpheme?
Whatisanallomorph?
The“morpheme”isthesmallestunitintermsofrelationshipbetweenexpressionandcontent,aunitwhichcannotbedividedwithoutdestroyingordrasticallyalteringthemeaning,whetheritislexicalorgrammatical.Theword“boxes”,forexample,hastwomorphemes:
“box”and“-es”,neitherofwhichpermitsfurtherdivisionoranalysisifwedon’twishtosacrificemeaning.Thereforeamorphemeisconsideredtheminimalunitofmeaning.
Allomorphs,likeallophonesvs.phones,arethealternateshapes(andthusphoneticforms)ofthesamemorpheme.Somemorphemes,though,havenomorethanoneinvariableforminallcontexts,suchas“dog”,“cat”,etc.Thevariantsoftheplurality“-s”maketheallomorphsthereofinthefollowingexamples:
map→maps,mouse→mice,sheep→sheepetc.
Whatisconcord?
Whatisgovernment?
“Concord”maybedefinedastherequirementthattheformsoftwoormorewordsofspecificwordclassesthatstandinspecificsyntacticrelationshipwithoneanothershallbecharacterisedbythesameparadigmaticallymarkedcategoryorcategories,e.g.,“manruns”,“menrun”.“Government”requiresthatonewordofaparticularclassinagivensyntacticclassshallexhibittheformofaspecificcategory.InEnglish,governmentappliesonlytopronounsamongthevariablewords,thatis,prepositionsandverbsgovernparticularformsoftheparadigmsofpronounsaccordingtotheirsyntacticrelationwiththem,e.g.,“Ihelpedhim;hehelpedme.”
WhatistheSapir-WhorfHypothesis?
(Whatislinguisticdeterminismandlinguisticrelativity?
)
TheSapir-WhorfHypothesisisaseriesofideasaboutthelanguage-culturerelationship,formulatedbyEdwardSapirandBenjaminLeeWhorf,themainideasofwhichare:
(1)one’sthinkingiscompletelydeterminedbyhisnativelanguagebecauseonecannotbutperceivetheworldintermsofthecategoriesanddistinctionsencodedinthatlanguage.
(2)thecategoriesanddistinctionsencodedinonelanguagesystemareuniquetothatsystemandincommensurablewiththoseofothersystems.
Or,putdifferently,theSapir-WhorfHypothesishasthefollowingtwomajorthrusts:
linguisticdeterminismandlinguisticrelativity.
1.Whatisaspeechact?
Aspeechactisanutteranceasafunctionalunitincommunication.Inspeechacttheory,utteranceshavetwokindsofmeaning.
Propositionalmeaning(locutionarymeaning):
Thisisthebasicliteralmeaningoftheutterancewhichisconveyedbytheparticularwordsandstructureswhichtheutterancecontains.
Illocutionarymeaning(illocutionaryforce):
Thisistheeffecttheutteranceorwrittentexthasonthereaderorlistener.E.g.inI’mthirsty,thepropositionalmeaningiswhattheutterancesaysaboutthespeaker’sphysicalstate.Theillocutionaryforceistheeffectthespeakerwantstheutterancetohaveonthelistener.Itmaybeintendedasrequestforsomethingtodrink.Aspeechactisasentenceorutterancewhichhasbothpropositionalmeaningandillocutionaryforce.
Aspeechactwhichisperformedindirectlyissometimesknownasanindirectspeechact,suchasthespeechactoftherequestingabove.Indirectspeechactsareoftenfelttobemorepolitewaysofperformingcertainkindsofspeechact,suchasrequestsandrefusals,2.Locutionaryact:
AdistinctionismadebyAustininthetheoryofspeechactsbetweenthreedifferenttypesofactsinvolvedinorcausedbytheutteranceofasentence.Alocutionaryactisthesayingofsomethingwhichismeaningfulandcanbeunderstood3.Illocutionaryact:
Anillocutionaryactisusingasentencetoperformafunction.4.Perlocutionaryact:
Aperlocutionaryactistheresultsoreffectsthatareproducedbymeansofsayingsomething.
Whatisanindirectspeechact?
An“indirectspeechact”meansthatsomesentences,intheutteranceandtheseemingperformanceofaspeechact,performacertainillocutionaryactindirectly.Forexample:
“Canyoupassmethesaltplease?
”isaquestion,butitismoreofarequestthanofaninterrogationaboutthehearer’ssalt-passingability.Theproblemishowitispossibleforthespeakertosayonethingandmeananother,andhowitispossibleforthehearertounderstandtheindirectspeechact.Itisthesharedbackgroundinformationandthegeneralpowerofrationalityandthepowerofinferenceonthepartofthehearerthatco-operative
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 考研 语言学 复习资料