组织行为学群体决策.docx
- 文档编号:24204321
- 上传时间:2023-05-25
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:8
- 大小:21.32KB
组织行为学群体决策.docx
《组织行为学群体决策.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《组织行为学群体决策.docx(8页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
组织行为学群体决策
组织行为学:
群体决策
Thebelief—characterizedbyjuries—thattwoheadsarebetterthanonehaslongbeenacceptedasabasiccomponentofNorthAmericanandmanyothercountries’legalsystems.Thebeliefhasexpandedtothepointthat,today,manydecisionsinorganizationsaremadebygroups,teams,orcommittees.
在工作群体内是采用个人决策还群体决策,要紧取决于问题的性质。
AdvantageofGroups
Individualandgroupdecisionseachhavetheirownsetofstrengths.Neitherisidealforallsituations.Thefollowingidentifiesthemajoradvantagesthatgroupsofferoverindividualsinthemakingofdecisions:
1.Morecompleteinformationandknowledge
2.Increaseddiversityofviews
3.Increasedacceptanceofasolution
4.Increasedlegitimacy
NorthAmericanandmanyothercapitalisticsocietiesvaluedemocraticmethods.Thegroupdecisionmakingprocessisconsistentwithdemocraticidealsand,therefore,maybeperceivedasbeingmorelegitimatethandecisionsmadebyasingleperson.
Whenanindividualdecisionmakerfailstoconsultwithothersbeforemakingadecision,thedecisionmaker’scompletepowercancreatethe
perceptionthatthedecisionwasmadeautocraticallyandarbitrarily.
DisadvantagesofGroups
1.Timeconsuming
2.Pressurestoconform
Asnotedpreviously,therearesocialpressuresingroups.Thedesirebygroupmemberstobeacceptedandconsideredanassettothegroupcanresultinsquashinganyovertdisagreement,thusencouragingconformityamongviewpoints.
3.Dominationbythefew
Groupdiscussioncanbedominatedbytheoneorafewmembers.Ifthisdominantcoalitioniscomposedoflow-andmedium-abilitymembers,thegroup’soveralleffectivenesswillsuffer.
4.Ambiguousresponsibility
Groupmembersshareresponsibility,butwhoisactuallyaccountableforthefinaloutcome?
Inanindividualdecision,itisclearwhoisresponsible.Inagroupdecision,theresponsibilityofanysinglememberiswatereddown.
Effectivenessandefficiency:
whethergroupsaremoreeffectivethanindividualsdependsonthecriteriayouusefordefiningeffectiveness.Intermsofaccuracy,groupdecisionstendtobemoreaccurate.Theevidenceindicatesthat,ontheaverage,groupsmakebetterqualitydecisionsthanindividuals.However,ifdecisioneffectivenessisdefinedintermsofspeed,individualsaresuperior.Buteffectivenesscannotbeconsideredwithoutalsoassessingefficiency.Groupsaregenerallylessefficientthanindividuals.Indecidingwhethertousegroups,then,considerationshouldbegiventoassessingwhetherincreasesineffectivenessaremorethanenoughtooffsetthelossesinefficiency.
Summary
Groupsofferanexcellentvehicleforperformingmanyofthestepsinthedecision-makingprocess.Theyareasourceofbothbreadthanddepthofinputforinformationgathering.Ifthegroupiscomposedofindividualswithdiversebackgrounds,thealternativesgeneratedshouldbemoreextensiveandtheanalysismorecritical.Whenthefinalsolutionisagreedon,therearemorepeopleinagroupdecisiontosupportandimplementit.Thesepluses,however,canbemorethanoffsetbythetimeconsumedbygroupdecisions,theinternalconflictstheycreate,andthepressurestheygeneratetowardconformity.
Groupshift
Groupshiftcanbeviewedasactuallyaspecialcaseofgroupthink.The
decisionofthegroupreflectsthedominantdecision-makingnormthatdevelopsduringthegroup’sdiscussion.Whethertheshiftinthegroup’sdecisionistowardgreatercautionormoreriskdependsonthedominantprediscussionnorm.
Groupthink
Wehaveallseenthesymptomsofthegroupthinkphenomenon:
(1)Groupmembersrationalizeanyresistancetotheassumptionstheyhavemade.Nomatterhowstronglytheevidencemaycontradicttheirbasicassumptions,membersbehavesoastoreinforcethoseassumptionscontinually
(2)Membersapplydirectpressuresonthosewhomomentarilyexpressdoubtsaboutanyofthegroup’ssharedviewsorwhoquestionthevalidityofargumentssupportingthealternativefavoredbythemajority
(3)Thosememberswhohavedoubtsorholddifferingpointsofviewseektoavoiddeviatingfromwhatappearstobegroupconsensusbykeepingsilentaboutmisgivingsandevenminimizingtothemselvestheimportanceoftheirdoubts
(4)Thereappearstobeanillusionofunanimity.Ifsomeonedoesn’tspeak,it’sassumedheisinfullaccord.Inotherwords,abstentionbecomesviewedasa“Yes”vote.
1.参与的程度(弗隆——耶顿模型)
弗隆和耶顿主张,成员们参与群体决策的适当程度应取决于所决定的问题的类型。
他们提出了如下七个诊断性的问题,供治理人员在确信决策问题类型时参考。
(1)有无一个能说明某一解决方案比另一种方案更好的标准?
(2)我是不是已把握了充分的信息?
(3)所面临的问题有必然的章法吗?
(4)我是不是需要手下同意这种方案?
(5)若是我独自做出决定,手下会同意吗?
(6)手下的目标跟组织的目标一致吗?
(7)手下彼其间可能有矛盾吗?
群体参与决策的程度
参与程度
类型代号
说明
无
AI
管理人员独自做出决策。
单独
AII
管理人员向下级了解情况,但独自决策,可能告诉也可能不告诉下级是什么问题
协商
CI
管理人员向下级交底,向他们了解情况,也征求他们的意见。
召集只有少数人参加的小会,但不如集全体会议,然后管理人员离开大家,单独去做出决策。
群体
CII
管理人员和他的下级,作为一个群体,一起来开会讨论问题,不过仍由管理人员最后决策。
高
G
管理人员和他的下级起开会来讨论问题,由群体作为一个整体来制定决策。
弗隆和耶顿的这个模型,可以帮助人们诊断他们要决策的问题的类型,还可指导他们选择应当采用的群体参与程度。
但是,决不能把这个模型当成一个参与程度的简单的“食谱”来使用,不能以为这个模型能提供全部的答案。
2.群体决策内容
工作群体自主程度的连续统一体
决策领域的内容
群体自主程度高
群体对其质量指标有影响力
——
群体对其数量指标有影响力
——
群体能决定其外部领导问题
——
群体能决定接受什么另外的任务
——
群体能决定工作时间
——
群体能决定生产问题
——
群体能决定其任务的内部分配
——
群体能决定新成员的招收
——
群体能决定内部领导方式
——
群体能决定各个人的生产方法
——
低
3.群体参与的益处与局限
工作群体的参与问题,和组织中的权利分派及操纵机构紧密相关。
参与性决策PDM。
参与性群体一样所面临的潜在局限性是时刻、人格化和不平稳性。
4.综合式群体解决问题
综合式群体解决问题模型——W.C.莫理斯和M.萨什金模型
.莫理斯和M.萨什金综合式群体解决问题模型总结
阶段
活动
I 问题的确定
说明问题的情况,产生信息,澄清问题并确定问题。
第I阶段就是鼓励群体去彻底探明、澄清和确定问题。
II 解决问题方案的产生
集体设想各种供选方案;审查、修正、斟酌、发展及重新组织合各种供选方案。
第II阶段用来延长酝酿意见的过程,以防止不成熟的决策。
III 从意见到行动
评价各种供选方案,考察可能造成的后果,并将它与所期望的结果进行比较;修改各种意见,开列出各种供选的最后行动方案,从中选取一个进行试验。
IV 解决方案的行动计划
拟订一系列的行动步骤,指定每一步骤的负责人并记下其姓名;拟出一个行动协调计划。
V 解决方案的评价
检查所希望获得的结果;确定测定效果的方法,当方案付诸实施时,制定出搜集供评价用数据的监控计划;拟就应变计划,明确责任。
VI 对结果和过程进行评价
汇集评价数据以确定行动的效果,以及群体解决问题过程的效能。
Shouldmanagementseekcohesiveworkgroup?
Intuitively,itwouldappearthatgroupsinwhichthereisalotofinternaldisagreementandalackofcooperativespiritwouldberelativelylesseffectiveatcompletingtheirtasksthanwouldgroupsinwhichindividualsgenerallyagreeandcooperateandwherememberslikeeachother.Researchtotestthisintuitionhasfocusedontheconceptofgroupcohesiveness.
Cohesivenessisdefinedasthedegreetowhichmembersareattractedto
oneanotherandaremotivatedtostayinthegroup.
Determinantsofcohesiveness
Whatfactorsdeterminewhethergroupmemberswillbeattractedtooneanother?
Cohesivenesscanbeaffectedbysuchfactorsastimespenttogether,theseverityofinitiation,groupsize,thegendermakeupofthegroup,externalthreats,andprevioussuccess.
Timespenttogether:
Theamountoftimepeoplespendtogetherinfluencescohesiveness.Aspeoplespendmoretimetogether,theybecomemorefriendly.Theynaturallybegintotalk,respond,gesture,andengageinotherinteractions.Theseinteractionstypicallyleadtothediscoveryofcommoninterestsandincreasedattraction.Theopportunityforgroupmemberstospendtimetogetherdependsontheirphysicalproximity.
Severityofinitiation:
themoredifficultitistogetintoagroup,themorecohesivethatgroupbecomes.Thecompetitiontobeacceptedintoagoodmedicalschoolresultsinfirst-yearmedicalschoolclassesthatarehighlycohesive.Thecommoninitiationrites—applications,testtaking,interviews,andthelongwaitforafinaldecision—allcontributetocreatingthiscohesiveness.
Groupsize:
ifgroupcohesivenesstendstoincreasewiththetimemembersareabletospendtogether,itseemslogicalthatcohesivenessshoulddecreasesasgroupsizeincreases,sinceitbecomesmoredifficultforamembertointeractwithalltheothermembers.Thisisgenerally
whattheresearchindicates.
Genderofmembers:
aconsistentfindinginrecentstudiesisthatwomenreportgreater
cohesionthanmen.Inonestudy,all-femaleandmixed-sexsixpersonpersonalgrowthgroupsratedthemselveshigheroncohesionthandidmembersofall-malegroups.
Externalthreats:
mostofresearchsupportsthepropositionthatagroup’scohesivenesswillincreaseifthegroupcomesunderattackfromexternalsources.
Previoussuccess:
ifagrouphasahistoryofsuccess,itbuildsanespritdecorpsthatattractsandunitesmembers.Successfulfirmsfinditeasiertoattractandhirenewemployeesthanunsuccessfulones.
Effectsofcohesivenessongroupproductivity
Researchhasgenerallyshownthathighlycohesivegroupsaremoreeffectivethanthosewithlesscohesiveness,buttherelationshipismorecomplexthanmerelyallowingustosayhighcohesivenessisgood.First,highcohesivenessisbothacauseandanoutcomeofhighproductivity.Second,therelationshipismoderatedbyperformance-relatednorms.
Cohesivenessinfluencesproductivityandproductivityinfluencescohesiveness.Camaraderiereducestensionandprovidesasupportiveenvironmentforsuccessfulattainmentofgroupgoals.Butthesuccessfulattainmentofgroupgoals,andthemembers’feelingsofhavebeenapartofasuccessfulunit,canservetoenhancethecommitmentofmembers.
终止语
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 组织 行为学 群体 决策