施工组织外文文献资料.docx
- 文档编号:23937753
- 上传时间:2023-05-22
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:15
- 大小:25.45KB
施工组织外文文献资料.docx
《施工组织外文文献资料.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《施工组织外文文献资料.docx(15页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
施工组织外文文献资料
文献信息
HendersonJR,RuikarK.Technologyimplementationstrategiesforconstructionorganizations[J].Engineering,ConstructionandArchitecturalManagement,2016,17(3):
309-327.
原文
Technologyimplementationstrategiesforconstructionorganizations
Henderson,JR;Ruikar,K
1Introduction
Theconstructionindustry,moresothananyotherindustry,issubjecttohighdegreesoffragmentation(SkibniewskiandNitithamyong,2004).Thislackofunityhasbeenhighlightedbymanyauthorsasafundamentalobstacletobeovercomeinordertoachievethesuccessfulimplementationofnewtechnologies(AnambahandRucker,2002;SkibniewskiandNitithamyong,2004).Itisalsosaidtohaveledtotheconstructionindustrylaggingbehindotherindustriesintheuptakeofnewtechnologies(SkibniewskiandNitithamyong,2004;MarshandFlanagan,2002;AnambahandRucker,2002).
Itisevidentthatotherindustrieshavebeenabletodiscovercompetitiveadvantagethroughtheabsorptionoftechnologiesenhancingtheirprocesses;however,theextenttowhichtheconstructionindustryisabletodothis,oriswillingtodothis,appearstobesignificantlyreduced.Nevertheless,environmentalfactorsincludingtheeverincreasingglobalizationoftheindustryandthefierceeconomicclimate,combinedwithtechnologicalfactorssuchastheprogressionoftechnologyinfrastructuresandapplicationsoverthepastdecade,aswellasthegrowingculturaldependenceontechnologyineverydayactivities,hascalledforaneednow,moresothanever,tobeproactiveintheseekingofnewinitiativesinordertoremaincompetitive.
Therehasbeenatendencyinthepasttoblamethetechnologyitselfwhendesiredresultshavenotmaterialized.This,combinedwiththedifficultyofquantifyingtheimpactoftechnologywithintheconstructionindustryduetothedegreeoffragmentation,canbeattributedtoasloweruptakeinnewtechnologiesthaninotherindustries.However,thereisevidencethatthefutureofconstructionisonethatembracestechnologicaladvances,andthereforethetimehascomewhereastrategicadoptionoftechnologyisrequiredinordertoextractitsfullpotential.
Accordingly,thisstudyexploresthecurrentstrategiesofconstructionorganizationsinanattempttoidentifyineffectiveorunder-performingpractices,aswellasthedriversandbarrierstotechnologyimplementation.Thisisinordertodeveloprecommendationstotheindustrywhichachieveamovetowardsthesuccessfulstrategicimplementationoftechnologies.
2Methodologyoutline
Inorderforallissuesregardingtechnologyimplementationtoemergefromthisresearch,amacro-levelinvestigationwasundertaken.Inaddition,toensuretheidentificationoftheindustry-specificfactorsthatinfluencethesuccessoftechnologyimplementationinconstructionorganizations,theresearchadoptedatwo-phaseapproach,asfollows:
Semi-structuredinterviewprocess.
Theinitialliteraturereviewphaseenabledabroadrangeofscientificliteraturetobeassessedinordertogainafullunderstandingofpreviouslydiscoveredissues.Theseincluded:
Benefitsanddriversofinformationtechnology(IT);
Reasonsthataffecttheuptakeofinformationtechnologiesinconstructionorganizations;
HowITinvestmentsareevaluated;
Barrierstoimplementation;
Resistancetochange(s);
Inaddition,italsoformedthebasisforthesecondphaseofresearch,whensemistructuredinterviewswithindustrypractitionerswereconducted.Thesemi-structuredinterviewsfocusedoninvestigatingandascertainingthekeyissuesidentifiedduringtheinitialreviewstage.Topicscoveredintheinterviewquestionnairereflectthis.Broadly,thequestionnairecoveredaspectsof:
thedecision-makingprocess,implementationprocess,howandbywhomtheneedforanewinitiativeisidentifiedandthenproposed,howbenefitsofnewITinitiativesareidentifiedandevaluated,howimplementationstrategiesareformulated,whatevidentimplementationbarriersthereare,andhowchangeismanaged.
Arandomsampleoflargeconstructioncompanieswasapproachedforinterviews.Theserepresentedabreadthofconstructiondisciplines,includingconstruction,buildingservices,engineering,buildingmaintenance,andconsultancyorganizations.Interviewparticipantswereidentifiedonthebasisoftheirpositionsbeingeitherseniormanagementlevelandthereforeactivelyinvolvedwiththeformulationandimplementationofstrategicmanagement,oratalevelthatwasdirectlyexposedtotheconsequencesofthestrategiesimplemented.Thiswasrecognizedascritical,as[2]Creswell(1994)statesthatwhenselectingparticipantsforsampling,itisessentialthatallparticipantsexperiencethephenomenonbeingstudied.Anoverviewoftheparticipant'sbackgroundandtheirorganization’sdisciplinesarepresentedinTableI
Allintervieweesweresentapredefinedinterviewquestionnairepriortotheinterviewsothattheywereabletofullyunderstandthequestions,aswellasprepareanswers.Face-to-faceinterviewswereconductedwherepossibleinordertoestablishastrongerrapportwiththeinterviewee,aswellastobenefitfrombeingabletoassessadditional,non-verbalcommunicationsuchasbodylanguage([3]Hakim,1997).Telephoneinterviewswereconductedwhenthelocationoftheinterviewerandintervieweeaswellastheirindividualtimedemandswerenotcomplementary.Allintervieweeswereencouragedtodivulgetheirexperiencesandreal-lifeexamples,whilstthesemi-structuredinterviewformatfacilitatedadditionalprobingtoextractfurtherinformationwherenecessary.Analysisofthedatawasmainlycarriedoutqualitatively;however,forillustrativepurposes,quantitativerepresentationssupplementedthefindingswhereappropriate.Thenextsectionpresentsthemainfindingsfromtheinterviews.
3Mainresearchfindings
Itwasobservedthatvaryingformsofdecision-makingmethodswereadoptedwithintheinterviewsample.
Itwasregardedbytheinterviewsamplethatdifferingdecision-makingvariables-forexamplethesizeoftheinvestmentinvolved,orthearrayofinterestareasand/oremployeestobeaffected-maydeterminethesuitabilityofthedecisionmaker,(seniormanagement,lowerlevels,oracombinationoflevels).Forexample,IntervieweeDstatedthat:
Itisdifferentdependingonthesizeofthebudgetorthedegreeofriskoftheproject.Ifitisaverylargeprojectitwillgotothetopoftheorganizationfortheirapproval.However,ifitisnotaverylargeprojectthenitwillstayatthelevelofthebudgetholders'responsibility.
Thisbeingsaid,ithasbeenhighlightedthroughoutthisstudythattransparencyoftheentiredecision-makingprocessisvitalinordertoovercomemanyapparentbarrierstoimplementation,withtheneedforthistostemtoasmanyareasoftheorganizationasreasonablypossible.
Throughtheincorporationofmoreextensivemultiple-levelinvolvementaswellasimprovedtwo-waycommunicationmediainallstagesoftheimplementationprocess,benefitsincludingthereductionofbarrierssuchasresistancetochangecanbeexperienced.Thisisduetothereductioninthelevelsofuncertaintysurroundinganyimpendingchangesthatisexperiencedbyemployeesduetotheirincreasedinvolvementandthereforeawareness.
Inaddition,IntervieweeJsuggestedthatthedecisionswerenotmadeattheleveltobeaffectedwithintheirorganization,as"thiscancausecompatibilityissuestotherestoftheirorganization".Similarly,IntervieweeGdismissedtheuseoftop-downdecision-makingmethodsbecause"ifdecisionsareimposedonpeopletheywillgetrejected".
Theimplicationsofthesefindingsisaneedtomoveawayfromthedecision-makingproceduresofdecisionsbeingmadebyseniormanagementandthenimposedontotheorganization(top-down),ordecisionsbeingmadeatthelevelthatwillultimatelybeaffected.Alternatively,amovetowardstheadoptionofdecisionsbeingmadebyconductingdiscussionsbetweenthevarioushierarchicallevelsshouldbesought.
Althoughthisprocessmayreducesomeoftheshort-termbenefitsexperienced,suchasthespeedatwhichdecisionscanbemade,itwasshowntoresultinfargreaterlong-termbenefits.Theseinclude:
Ensuringthelong-standingcompatibilitybetweendecisions;
Enhancingthedegreethatthedecisionhasbeenwellinformed(throughgainingtheperspectivesofparticipantsfrommultiplelevelsofthehierarchy);and
Mostimportantly,improvingthelevelsofunderstandingintodecision-makingrationale,andthelevelsofinvolvementorrepresentationeachemployeehasintheoverallprocess.
Theselattertwobenefitsheightenthelikelihoodforsuccessfulimplementationtobeexperiencedthroughthereductioninprominenceofthemostsignificantbarriertoimplementation-"resistancetochange".Barrierstoimplementationarecoveredinmoredetaillaterinthispaper.
4Implementationprocess
Figure2hasbeengeneratedtoillustratehowthiswidelyadoptedimplementationprocessconsistsofanupwardprogressionthroughtheorganizationalhierarchy.Throughinitiallyevolvingastheidentificationofaneed(whichwasfoundusuallytobeprovokedbylowormiddlelevelsofthehierarchy),middlelevelmanagementthendiscuss,outlineandmutuallyagreethisneedwiththeinitiator(s).Onceanagreementoftheneedisfound,themiddlelevelissolelyresponsibleforconductingresearchintothebenefitsandpotentialimpactsofanyidentifiedsolution(s).Thisidentifiedsolution,combinedwiththeresearchedbenefitsanddrawbacks,thereforeformsthebasisofaformalproposalthatwillultimatelybeassessedbyseniorboardmembers.Insomeinstances,atthisstageintheprocess,
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 施工 组织 外文 文献资料