Lesser Hippias.docx
- 文档编号:23207566
- 上传时间:2023-05-15
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:26
- 大小:31.55KB
Lesser Hippias.docx
《Lesser Hippias.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Lesser Hippias.docx(26页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
LesserHippias
LesserHippiasbyPlato(seeAppendixI)
TranslatedbyBenjaminJowettAPPENDIXI.
ItseemsimpossibletoseparatebyanyexactlinethegenuinewritingsofPlatofromthespurious.TheonlyexternalevidencetothemwhichisofmuchvalueisthatofAristotle;fortheAlexandriancataloguesofacenturylaterincludemanifestforgeries.EventhevalueoftheAristotelianauthorityisagooddealimpairedbytheuncertaintyconcerningthedateandauthorshipofthewritingswhichareascribedtohim.AndseveralofthecitationsofAristotleomitthenameofPlato,andsomeofthemomitthenameofthedialoguefromwhichtheyaretaken.
Prior,however,totheenquiryaboutthewritingsofaparticularauthor,generalconsiderationswhichequallyaffectallevidencetothegenuinenessofancientwritingsarethefollowing:
Shorterworksaremorelikelytohavebeenforged,ortohavereceivedanerroneousdesignation,thanlongerones;andsomekindsofcomposition,suchasepistlesorpanegyricalorations,aremoreliabletosuspicionthanothers;those,again,whichhaveatasteofsophistryinthem,ortheringofalaterage,ortheslightercharacterofarhetoricalexercise,orinwhichamotiveorsomeaffinitytospuriouswritingscanbedetected,orwhichseemtohaveoriginatedinanameorstatementreallyoccurringinsomeclassicalauthor,arealsoofdoubtfulcredit;whilethereisnoinstanceofanyancientwritingprovedtobeaforgery,whichcombinesexcellencewithlength.AreallygreatandoriginalwriterwouldhavenoobjectinfatheringhisworksonPlato;andtotheforgerorimitator,the'literaryhack'ofAlexandriaandAthens,theGodsdidnotgrantoriginalityorgenius.Further,inattemptingtobalancetheevidenceforandagainstaPlatonicdialogue,wemustnotforgetthattheformofthePlatonicwritingwascommontoseveralofhiscontemporaries.Aeschines,Euclid,Phaedo,Antisthenes,andinthenextgenerationAristotle,areallsaidtohavecomposeddialogues;andmistakesofnamesareverylikelytohaveoccurred.
GreekliteratureinthethirdcenturybeforeChristwasalmostasvoluminousasourown,andwithoutthesafeguardsofregularpublication,orprinting,orbinding,orevenofdistincttitles.Anunknownwritingwasnaturallyattributedtoaknownwriterwhoseworksborethesamecharacter;andthenameonceappendedeasilyobtainedauthority.Atendencymayalsobeobservedtoblendtheworksandopinionsofthemasterwiththoseofhisscholars.ToalaterPlatonist,thedifferencebetweenPlatoandhisimitatorswasnotsoperceptibleastoourselves.TheMemorabiliaofXenophonandtheDialoguesofPlatoarebutapartofaconsiderableSocraticliteraturewhichhaspassedaway.Andwemustconsiderhowweshouldregardthequestionofthegenuinenessofaparticularwriting,ifthislostliteraturehadbeenpreservedtous.
Theseconsiderationsleadustoadoptthefollowingcriteriaofgenuineness:
(1)ThatismostcertainlyPlato'swhichAristotleattributestohimbyname,which
(2)isofconsiderablelength,of(3)greatexcellence,andalso(4)inharmonywiththegeneralspiritofthePlatonicwritings.ButthetestimonyofAristotlecannotalwaysbedistinguishedfromthatofalaterage(seeabove);andhasvariousdegreesofimportance.ThosewritingswhichheciteswithoutmentioningPlato,undertheirownnames,e.g.theHippias,theFuneralOration,thePhaedo,etc.,haveaninferiordegreeofevidenceintheirfavour.Theymayhavebeensupposedbyhimtobethewritingsofanother,althoughinthecaseofreallygreatworks,e.g.thePhaedo,thisisnotcredible;thoseagainwhicharequotedbutnotnamed,arestillmoredefectiveintheirexternalcredentials.TheremaybealsoapossibilitythatAristotlewasmistaken,ormayhaveconfusedthemasterandhisscholarsinthecaseofashortwriting;butthisisinconceivableaboutamoreimportantwork,e.g.theLaws,especiallywhenwerememberthathewaslivingatAthens,andafrequenterofthegrovesoftheAcademy,duringthelasttwentyyearsofPlato'slife.NormustweforgetthatinallhisnumerouscitationsfromthePlatonicwritingsheneverattributesanypassagefoundintheextantdialoguestoanyonebutPlato.Andlastly,wemayremarkthatoneortwogreatwritings,suchastheParmenidesandthePoliticus,whicharewhollydevoidofAristotelian
(1)credentialsmaybefairlyattributedtoPlato,onthegroundof
(2)length,(3)excellence,and(4)accordancewiththegeneralspiritofhiswritings.IndeedthegreaterpartoftheevidenceforthegenuinenessofancientGreekauthorsmaybesummedupundertwoheadsonly:
(1)excellence;and
(2)uniformityoftradition--akindofevidence,whichthoughinmanycasessufficient,isofinferiorvalue.
Proceedingupontheseprinciplesweappeartoarriveattheconclusionthatnineteen-twentiethsofallthewritingswhichhaveeverbeenascribedtoPlato,areundoubtedlygenuine.Thereisanotherportionofthem,includingtheEpistles,theEpinomis,thedialoguesrejectedbytheancientsthemselves,namely,theAxiochus,Dejusto,Devirtute,Demodocus,Sisyphus,Eryxias,whichongrounds,bothofinternalandexternalevidence,weareablewithequalcertaintytoreject.Buttherestillremainsasmallportionofwhichweareunabletoaffirmeitherthattheyaregenuineorspurious.Theymayhavebeenwritteninyouth,orpossiblyliketheworksofsomepainters,maybepartlyorwhollythecompositionsofpupils;ortheymayhavebeenthewritingsofsomecontemporarytransferredbyaccidenttothemorecelebratednameofPlato,orofsomePlatonistinthenextgenerationwhoaspiredtoimitatehismaster.Notthatongroundseitheroflanguageorphilosophyweshouldlightlyrejectthem.Somedifferenceofstyle,orinferiorityofexecution,orinconsistencyofthought,canhardlybeconsidereddecisiveoftheirspuriouscharacter.Forwhoalwaysdoesjusticetohimself,orwhowriteswithequalcareatalltimes?
CertainlynotPlato,whoexhibitsthegreatestdifferencesindramaticpower,intheformationofsentences,andintheuseofwords,ifhisearlierwritingsarecomparedwithhislaterones,saytheProtagorasorPhaedruswiththeLaws.Orwhocanbeexpectedtothinkinthesamemannerduringaperiodofauthorshipextendingoverabovefiftyyears,inanageofgreatintellectualactivity,aswellasofpoliticalandliterarytransition?
CertainlynotPlato,whoseearlierwritingsareseparatedfromhislateronesbyaswideanintervalofphilosophicalspeculationasthatwhichseparateshislaterwritingsfromAristotle.
ThedialogueswhichhavebeentranslatedinthefirstAppendix,andwhichappeartohavethenextclaimtogenuinenessamongthePlatonicwritings,aretheLesserHippias,theMenexenusorFuneralOration,theFirstAlcibiades.Ofthese,theLesserHippiasandtheFuneralOrationarecitedbyAristotle;thefirstintheMetaphysics,thelatterintheRhetoric.
NeitherofthemareexpresslyattributedtoPlato,butinhiscitationofbothofthemheseemstobereferringtopassagesintheextantdialogues.
Fromthementionof'Hippias'inthesingularbyAristotle,wemayperhapsinferthathewasunacquaintedwithaseconddialoguebearingthesamename.Moreover,themereexistenceofaGreaterandLesserHippias,andofaFirstandSecondAlcibiades,doestoacertainextentthrowadoubtuponbothofthem.Thoughaverycleverandingeniouswork,theLesserHippiasdoesnotappeartocontainanythingbeyondthepowerofanimitator,whowasalsoacarefulstudentoftheearlierPlatonicwritings,toinvent.
ThemotiveorleadingthoughtofthedialoguemaybedetectedinXen.Mem.,andthereisnosimilarinstanceofa'motive'whichistakenfromXenophoninanundoubteddialogueofPlato.Ontheotherhand,theupholdersofthegenuinenessofthedialoguewillfindintheHippiasatrueSocraticspirit;theywillcomparetheIonasbeingakinbothinsubjectandtreatment;theywillurgetheauthorityofAristotle;andtheywilldetectinthetreatmentoftheSophist,inthesatiricalreasoninguponHomer,inthereductioadabsurdumofthedoctrinethatviceisignorance,tracesofaPlatonicauthorship.Inreferencetothelastpointwearedoubtful,asinsomeoftheotherdialogues,whethertheauthorisassertingoroverthrowingtheparadoxofSocrates,ormerelyfollowingtheargument'whitherthewindblows.'Thatnoconclusionisarrivedatisalsoinaccordancewiththecharacteroftheearlierdialogues.TheresemblancesorimitationsoftheGorgias,Protagoras,andEuthydemus,whichhavebeenobservedintheHippias,cannotwithcertaintybeadducedoneithersideoftheargument.Onthewhole,moremaybesaidinfavourofthegenuinenessoftheHippiasthanagainstit.
TheMenexenusorFuneralOrationiscitedbyAristotle,andisinterestingassupplyinganexampleofthemannerinwhichtheoratorspraised'theAtheniansamongtheAthenians,'falsifyingpersonsanddates,andcastingaveiloverthegloomiereventsofAthenianhistory.ItexhibitsanacquaintancewiththefuneralorationofThucydides,andwas,perhaps,intendedtorivalthatgreatwork.Ifgenuine,theproperplaceoftheMenexenuswouldbeattheendofthePhaedrus.Thesatiricalopeningandtheconcludingwordsbearagreatresemblancetotheearlierdialogues;theorationitselfisprofessedlyamimeticwork,likethespeechesinthePhaedrus,andcannotthereforebetestedbyacomparisonoftheotherwritingsofPlato.ThefuneralorationofPericlesisexpresslymentionedinthePhaedrus,andthismayhavesuggestedthesubject,inthesamemannerthattheCleitophonappearstobesuggestedbytheslightmentionofCleitophonandhisattachmenttoThrasymachusintheRe
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- Lesser Hippias
![提示](https://static.bdocx.com/images/bang_tan.gif)