评语大全之英语专业论文评语文档格式.docx
- 文档编号:22672676
- 上传时间:2023-02-05
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:17
- 大小:27.44KB
评语大全之英语专业论文评语文档格式.docx
《评语大全之英语专业论文评语文档格式.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《评语大全之英语专业论文评语文档格式.docx(17页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
also,therearefewexplanationsoftherationaleforthestudydesign.
4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨:
theconclusionsareoverstated.forexample,thestudydidnotshow
ifthesideeffectsfrominitialcopperburstcanbeavoidwiththepolymerformulation.
5、对hypothesis的清晰界定:
ahypothesisneedstobepresented。
6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/定义概念:
whatwastherationaleforthefilm/sbfvolumeratio?
7、对研究问题的定义:
trytosettheproblemdiscussedinthispaperinmoreclear,
writeonesectiontodefinetheproblem
8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literaturereview:
thetopicisnovelbuttheapplicationproposedisnotsonovel.
9、对claim,如a>b的证明,verification:
thereisnoexperimentalcomparisonofthealgorithmwithpreviouslyknownwork,soitisimpossibletojudgewhetherthealgorithmisanimprovementonpreviouswork.
10、严谨度问题:
mnqiseasierthantheprimitivepnqs,howtoprovethat.
11、格式(重视程度):
◆inaddition,thelistofreferencesisnotinourstyle.itisclosebutnotcompletelycorrect.ihaveattachedapdffilewithinstructionsforauthorswhichshowsexamples.◆beforesubmittingarevisionbesurethatyourmaterialisproperlypreparedand
formatted.ifyouareunsure,pleaseconsulttheformattingnstructionstoauthorsthataregivenundertheinstructionsandformsbuttoninheupperright-handcornerofthescreen.
12、语言问题(出现最多的问题):
有关语言的审稿人意见:
◆itisnotedthatyourmanuscriptneedscarefuleditingbysomeonewithexpertiseintechnicalenglisheditingpayingparticularattentiontoenglishgrammar,spelling,andsentencestructuresothatthegoalsandresultsofthestudyarecleartothereader.◆theauthorsmusthavetheirworkreviewedbyapropertranslation/reviewingservicebeforesubmission;
onlythencanaproperreviewbeperformed.mostsentencescontaingrammaticaland/orspellingmistakesorarenotcompletesentences.
◆aspresented,thewritingisnotacceptableforthejournal.therearepro
blemswithsentencestructure,verbtense,andclauseconstruction.
◆theenglishofyourmanuscriptmustbeimprovedbeforeresubmission.westronglysuggestthatyouobtainassistancefromacolleaguewhoiswell-versedi
nenglishorwhosenativelanguageisenglish.
◆pleasehavesomeonecompetentintheenglishlanguageandthesubjectmatterofyourpapergooverthepaperandcorrectit.?
◆thequalityofenglishneedsimproving.
来自编辑的鼓励:
encouragementfromreviewers:
◆iwouldbeverygladtore-reviewthepaperingreaterdepthonceithasbe
eneditedbecausethesubjectisinteresting.
◆thereiscontinuedinterestinyourmanuscripttitled……whichyousubm
ittedtothejournalofbiomedicalmaterialsresearch:
partb-appliedbiomat
erials.
◆thesubmissionhasbeengreatlyimprovedandisworthyofpublication.
老外写的英文综述文章的审稿意见
ms.ref.no.:
******
title:
materialsscienceandengineering
deardr.******,
reviewershavenowcommentedonyourpaper.youwillseethattheyareadvisingthatyoureviseyourmanuscript.ifyouarepreparedtoundertaketheworkrequired,iwouldbepleasedtoreconsidermydecision.
foryourguidance,reviewerscommentsareappendedbelow.
reviewer#1:
thisworkproposesanextensivereviewonmicromulsion-basedmethodsforthesynthesisofagnanoparticles.assuch,thematterisofinterest,howeverthepapersuffersfortwoseriouslimits:
1)theoverallqualityoftheenglishlanguageisratherpoor;
2)somefiguresmustbeselectedfrompreviousliteraturetodiscussalsothesynthesisofanisotropicallyshapedagnanoparticles(thereareseveralexamplespublished),whichhasbeenlargelyoverlookedthroughoutthepaper.;
oncetheaboveconcernsarefullyaddressed,themanuscriptcouldbeacceptedforpublicationinthisjournal
这是一篇全过程我均比较了解的投稿,稿件的内容我认为是相当不错的,中文版投稿于业内有较高影响的某核心期刊,并很快得到发表。
其时我作为审稿人之一,除了提出一些修改建议外,还特建议了5篇应增加的参考文献,该文正式发表时共计有参考文献25篇。
作者或许看到审稿意见还不错,因此决意尝试向美国某学会主办的一份英文刊投稿。
几经修改和补充后,请一位英文“功底较好的中国人翻译,投稿后约3周,便返回了三份审稿意见。
从英文刊的反馈意见看,这篇稿件中最严重的问题是文献综述和引用不够,其次是语言表达方面的欠缺,此外是论证过程和结果展示形式方面的不足。
感想:
一篇好的论文,从内容到形式都需要精雕细琢。
附1:
中译审稿意见
审稿意见—1
(1)英文表达太差,尽管意思大致能表达清楚,但文法错误太多。
(2)文献综述较差,观点或论断应有文献支持。
(3)论文读起来像是xxx的广告,不知道作者与xxx是否没有关联。
(4)该模式的创新性并非如作者所述,目前有许多xx采取此模式(如美国地球物理学会),作者应详加调查并分析xxx运作模式的创新点。
(5)该模式也不是作者所说的那样成功……(审稿人结合论文中的数据具体分析)
审稿意见—2
(1)缺少直接相关的文献引用(如…)。
(2)写作质量达不到美国学术期刊的标准。
审稿意见—3
(1)作者应着重指出指出本人的贡献。
(2)缺少支持作者发现的方法学分析。
(3)需要采用表格和图件形式展示(数据)材料。
附2:
英文审稿意见(略有删节)
reviewer:
1
therearemanythingswrongwiththispaper.
theenglishisverybad.althoughthemeaningisbyandlargeclear,nottoomanysentencesarecorrect.
theliteraturereviewispoor.thepaperisriddledwithassertionsandclaimsthatshouldbesupportedbyreferences.
thepaperreadsasanadvertisementforxxx.itisnotclearthattheauthorisindependentofxxx.
therearenowmanyxxthatfollowthismodel(americangeophysicalunion,forexample),andtheauthorshouldsurveythesemodeltoseewhichonefirstintroducedtheelementsofthexxxmodel.
themodelisalsonotassuccessfulastheauthorclaims.……
overall,thepresentationandthecontentsofthepapercanonlymeanthatirejectthatthepaperberejected.
2
thearetwomajorproblemswiththispaper:
(1)itismissingthecontextof(andcitationsto)whatisnowknowasthetwo-sidedmarketliteratureincludingthatdirectlyrelatedto…(e.g.braunstein,jasis1977;
economideskatsanakas,mgt.sci.,2006;
mccabesnyder,b.e.jeconanalysis,2007).
(2)thewritingqualityisnotuptothestandardofausscholarlyjournal.reviewer:
3
1.theauthorshouldaccentuatehiscontributionsinthismanuscript.
2.itlacksanalyticalmethodologiestosupportauthor’sdiscoveries.
3.descriptionstylemateriallikethismanuscriptrequiresstructuredtablesfiguresforbetterpresentations.
ourjpcapaperwerepeerreviewedbytworeviewers,andtheircommentsareasfollows:
thecommentsbythefirstreviewer
editor:
michaela.duncan
68
manuscriptnumber:
jp067440i
manuscripttitle:
restrictedgeometryoptimization,adifferentwaytoestimatestabilizationenergiesforaromaticmoleculesofvarioustypes
correspondingauthor:
yu
recommendation:
thepaperisprobablypublishable,butshouldbereviewedagaininrevisedformbeforeitisaccepted.
additionalcomments:
inthepresentworktheauthorsintroduceanewenergy-basedaromaticitymeasure.referredasrestrictedgeometryoptimization,theextra
stabilizationenergy(ese)iscalculatedbymeansofanenergyschemeinwhichthedifferentdoublebondsarelocalized.thismethodologyisappliedtodifferentsetsofaromaticsystems,andtheresultsarecomparedtopreviousalreadyexistingschemes.thisprocedureseemstoworkbetterthanpreviousones,howeveritmustbeunderlinedthatwithamuchgreatercomplexity.itavoidshavingtochooseareferencestructure,anditisworthnoticingthatbenzeneappearstobethemostaromaticsystem.thusthemethodpresentedmightmeananewcontributiontothedifferentaromacitycriteria,howeverbeforeacceptanceforpublicationiwouldrecommendimportantchangestobetakenintoaccountinthemanuscript.
thenewmethodusedisnotpresentedinacomprehensibleway.inthesecondparagraphoftheintroductiontheauthorsshouldalreadydescribeit,andnotfirstpresentingtheresultsforbenzeneandnotgoingintothemethodtillthesecondsection.theformulasusedmustbedescribedpreciselyaswell.soiwould
recommendthatbeforeacceptancethemanuscriptshouldberewritteninordertomakeitmorecomprehensiblenotonlytophysicalchemistsbutalsotothe
experimentalchemicalcommunity,andatthesametimetoimprovetheenglishused.otherminorpointsare:
-firstlineofintroduction:
aromaticityisoneofthemostimportantconceptsinorganicchemistry,butmostoforganiccompoundsarenotaromatic.-introduction,line4:
noticethatonlyenergeticwaysofevaluatingaromaticityarementioned,howevergeometry-based(homa),magnetic-based(nics)andelectronic-based(sci,pdi)methodsarealsoimportant,andthispointshouldbepointedout.-section3.1,lastlineoffirstparagraph:
isb3lypchosenjustbecauseitgivessimilarresultstohfandmp2?
thisshouldbepointedoutinthemanuscript.-enlargedescriptioninpoint3.4.1bygoingdeeperintothedatainfigure8.
【篇二:
本科毕业论文评语】
英语专业-本科毕业论文评语示例.....................................................................................1
人力资源管理专业............................................................................................................2
本科毕业论文评语............................................................................................................2
“评阅教师评语”必须包含下列内容:
............................................................................3
新闻传媒院本科毕业论文评语的基本内容.........................................................................3
计算机科学系本科毕业论文评语书写方式.........................................................................4
表演本科班毕业论文评语.................................................................................................4
体育系本科生毕业论文评价...........................................
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 评语 大全 英语专业 论文