英文论文审稿意见英文版Word文档下载推荐.docx

英文论文审稿意见英文版Word文档下载推荐.docx

《英文论文审稿意见英文版Word文档下载推荐.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《英文论文审稿意见英文版Word文档下载推荐.docx（19页珍藏版）》请在冰豆网上搜索。

Ahypothesisneedstobepresented。

6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/定义概念：

Whatwastherationaleforthefilm/SBFvolumeratio?

7、对研究问题的定义：

Trytosettheproblemdiscussedinthispaperinmoreclear,

writeonesectiontodefinetheproblem

8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literaturereview:

The 

topic 

is 

novel 

but 

the 

application 

proposed 

not 

so 

novel.

9、对claim,如A＞B的证明，verification:

Thereisnoexperimentalcomparisonofthealgorithmwithpreviouslyknownwork,soitisimpossibletojudgewhetherthealgorithmisanimprovementonpreviouswork.

10、严谨度问题：

MNQiseasierthantheprimitivePNQS,howtoprovethat.

11、格式（重视程度）：

◆Inaddition,thelistofreferencesisnotinourstyle.Itisclosebutnotcompletelycorrect.Ihaveattachedapdffilewith"

InstructionsforAuthors"

whichshowsexamples.

◆Beforesubmittingarevisionbesurethatyourmaterialisproperlypreparedandformatted. 

Ifyouareunsure,pleaseconsulttheformattingnstructionstoauthorsthataregivenunderthe"

InstructionsandForms"

buttoninheupperright-handcornerofthescreen.

12、语言问题（出现最多的问题）：

有关语言的审稿人意见：

◆ItisnotedthatyourmanuscriptneedscarefuleditingbysomeonewithexpertiseintechnicalEnglisheditingpayingparticularattentiontoEnglishgrammar,spelling,andsentencestructuresothatthegoalsandresultsofthestudyarecleartothereader.

◆Theauthorsmusthavetheirworkreviewedbyapropertranslation/reviewingservicebeforesubmission;

onlythencanaproperreviewbeperformed.Mostsentencescontaingrammaticaland/orspellingmistakesorarenotcompletesentences.

◆Aspresented,thewritingisnotacceptableforthejournal. 

Therearepro

blemswithsentencestructure,verbtense,andclauseconstruction.

◆TheEnglishofyourmanuscriptmustbeimprovedbeforeresubmission.Westr

onglysuggestthatyouobtainassistancefromacolleaguewhoiswell-versedi

nEnglishorwhosenativelanguageisEnglish.

◆PleasehavesomeonecompetentintheEnglishlanguageandthesubjectmatte

rofyourpapergooverthepaperandcorrectit.?

◆thequalityofEnglishneedsimproving.

来自编辑的鼓励：

Encouragementfromreviewers:

◆Iwouldbeverygladtore-reviewthepaperingreaterdepthonceithasbe

eneditedbecausethesubjectisinteresting.

◆Thereiscontinuedinterestinyourmanuscripttitled"

……"

whichyousubm

ittedtotheJournalofBiomedicalMaterialsResearch:

PartB-AppliedBiomat

erials.

◆TheSubmissionhasbeengreatlyimprovedandisworthyofpublication.

老外写的英文综述文章的审稿意见

Ms.Ref.No.:

******

Title:

******

MaterialsScienceandEngineering

DearDr.******, 

Reviewershavenowcommentedonyourpaper.Youwillseethattheyareadvisingthatyoureviseyourmanuscript.Ifyouarepreparedtoundertaketheworkrequired,Iwouldbepleasedtoreconsidermydecision. 

Foryourguidance,reviewers&

#39;

commentsareappendedbelow.

Reviewer#1:

Thisworkproposesanextensivereviewonmicromulsion-basedmethodsforthesynthesisofAgnanoparticles.Assuch,thematterisofinterest,howeverthepapersuffersfortwoseriouslimits:

1） 

theoverallqualityoftheEnglishlanguageisratherpoor;

2） 

someFiguresmustbeselectedfrompreviousliteraturetodiscussalsothesynthesisofanisotropicallyshapedAgnanoparticles（thereareseveralexamplespublished）,whichhasbeenlargelyoverlookedthroughoutthepaper.;

Oncetheaboveconcernsarefullyaddressed,themanuscriptcouldbeacceptedforpublicationinthisjournal 

这是一篇全过程我均比较了解的投稿，稿件的内容我认为是相当不错的，中文版投稿于业内有较高影响的某核心期刊，并很快得到发表。

其时我作为审稿人之一，除了提出一些修改建议外，还特建议了5篇应增加的参考文献，该文正式发表时共计有参考文献25篇。

作者或许看到审稿意见还不错，因此决意尝试向美国某学会主办的一份英文刊投稿。

几经修改和补充后，请一位英文“功底"

较好的中国人翻译，投稿后约3周，便返回了三份审稿意见。

从英文刊的反馈意见看，这篇稿件中最严重的问题是文献综述和引用不够，其次是语言表达方面的欠缺，此外是论证过程和结果展示形式方面的不足。

感想：

一篇好的论文，从内容到形式都需要精雕细琢。

附1：

中译审稿意见

审稿意见—1

（1）英文表达太差，尽管意思大致能表达清楚，但文法错误太多。

（2）文献综述较差，观点或论断应有文献支持。

（3）论文读起来像是XXX的广告，不知道作者与XXX是否没有关联。

（4）该模式的创新性并非如作者所述，目前有许多XX采取此模式（如美国地球物理学会），作者应详加调查并分析XXX运作模式的创新点。

（5）该模式也不是作者所说的那样成功……（审稿人结合论文中的数据具体分析）

审稿意见—2

（1）缺少直接相关的文献引用（如…）。

（2）写作质量达不到美国学术期刊的标准。

审稿意见—3

（1）作者应着重指出指出本人的贡献。

（2）缺少支持作者发现的方法学分析。

（3）需要采用表格和图件形式展示（数据）材料。

OurJPCApaperwerepeerreviewedbytworeviewers,andtheircommentsareasfollows:

TheCommentsbytheFirstReviewer

Editor:

MichaelA.Duncan

Reviewer:

68

ManuscriptNumber:

jp067440i

ManuscriptTitle:

RestrictedGeometryOptimization,aDifferentWaytoEstimateStabilizationEnergiesforAromaticMoleculesofVariousTypes

CorrespondingAuthor:

Yu

Recommendation:

Thepaperisprobablypublishable,butshouldbereviewedagaininrevisedformbeforeitisaccepted.

AdditionalComments:

Inthepresentworktheauthorsintroduceanewenergy-basedaromaticitymeasure.Referredasrestrictedgeometryoptimization,theextrastabilizationenergy（ESE）iscalculatedbymeansofanenergyschemeinwhichthedifferentdoublebondsarelocalized.Thismethodologyisappliedtodifferentsetsofaromaticsystems,andtheresultsarecomparedtopreviousalreadyexistingschemes.Thisprocedureseemstoworkbetterthanpreviousones,howeveritmustbeunderlinedthatwithamuchgreatercomplexity.Itavoidshavingtochooseareferencestructure,anditisworthnoticingthatbenzeneappearstobethemostaromaticsystem.Thusthemethodpresentedmightmeananewcontributiontothedifferentaromacitycriteria,howeverbeforeacceptanceforpublicationIwouldrecommendimportantchangestobetakenintoaccountinthemanuscript.

Thenewmethodusedisnotpresentedinacomprehensibleway.InthesecondparagraphoftheIntroductiontheauthorsshouldalreadydescribeit,andnotfirstpresentingtheresultsforbenzeneandnotgoingintothemethodtillthesecondsection.Theformulasusedmustbedescribedpreciselyaswell.SoIwouldrecommendthatbeforeacceptancethemanuscriptshouldberewritteninordertomakeitmorecomprehensiblenotonlytophysicalchemistsbutalsototheexperimentalchemicalcommunity,andatthesametimetoimprovetheEnglishused.

Otherminorpointsare:

-FirstlineofIntroduction:

aromaticityisoneofthemostimportantconceptsinorganicchemistry,butmostoforganiccompoundsarenotaromatic.-Introduction,line4:

noticethatonlyenergeticwaysofevaluatingaromaticityarementioned,howevergeometry-based（HOMA）,magnetic-based（NICS）andelectronic-based（SCI,PDI）methodsarealsoimportant,andthispointshouldbepointedout.

-Section3.1,lastlineoffirstparagraph:

isB3LYPchosenjustbecauseitgivessimilarresultstoHFandMP2?

Thisshouldbepointedoutinthemanuscript.

-Enlargedescriptioninpoint3.4.1bygoingdeeperintothedatainFigure8.

ReviewSentDate:

18-Dec-2006

*****************************************

TheCommentsbythe 

SecondReviewer

67

RestrictedGeometryOptimization,aDifferentWaytoEstimateStabilization

EnergiesforAromaticMoleculesofVariousTypes

Commentsonthemanuscript"

RestrictedGeometryOptimization,aDifferentWaytoEstimateStabilizationEnergiesforAromaticMoleculesofVariousTypes"

byZhong-HengYu,PengBao

Authorsproposearestrictedgeometryoptimizationtechniquesubjecttopiorbitalinteractionconstraintsasanewmeasureofaromaticity.Theapproachisinterestingandhascertainmerits.Mymainobjectionisthatthemanuscriptisdifficulttoreadandunderstand,mainlybecauseofpoorEnglish.Asubstantialrevisioninthisrespectwouldbebeneficiary. 

各位：

新的恶战开始了。

投往JASA的文章没有被拒，但被批得很凶。

尽管如此，审稿人和编辑

还是给了我们一个修改和再被审的机会。

我们应当珍惜这个机会，不急不火。

我们首

先要有个修改的指导思想。

大家先看看审稿意见吧。

-----邮件原件-----

Manuscript#07-04147:

Editor'

sComments:

Thisismypersonaladditiontotheautomaticallygeneratedemaildisplayed

above.Yourmanuscripthasnowbeenreadbythreeknowledgeablereviewers,

eachofwhomhasprovidedthoughtfulanddetailedcommentsonthepaper.The

mainpointsofthereviewsareself-explanatoryandmostlyconsistentacross

thereviews.Yourpresentationneedstobereworkedsubstantially,andthe

reviewsgiveyoumanysuggestionsfordoingso.Clearly,theintroduction

needstobemuchmoreconciseandfocusedonthemainquestionsyoupropose

toanswer,andwhythesequestionsareimportant.Therationaleforselectingthisunusualconditionmustbeclear.Yourdiscussionshouldfocusonhowthequestionshavebeenansweredandwhattheymean.Theresultssectionisheavilydependentonstatisticalanalysesthatdidnotsatisfythereviewers.Thefiguresandtablescouldbeimprovedandperhapsconsolidated.Themethodscouldbeshortened.Forexample,Ithinkreaders

wouldtakeyourwordthatthesewerenonsensesentences,orperhapsyoucouldsi