民事审判哲学范式初论On the philosophical paradigm of civil trialWord格式.docx
- 文档编号:20969461
- 上传时间:2023-01-26
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:8
- 大小:20.55KB
民事审判哲学范式初论On the philosophical paradigm of civil trialWord格式.docx
《民事审判哲学范式初论On the philosophical paradigm of civil trialWord格式.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《民事审判哲学范式初论On the philosophical paradigm of civil trialWord格式.docx(8页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
Theterm"
paradigm"
comesfromGreekandcontainsthemeaningof"
commondisplay"
whichleadstothemodelandmodel,
Paradigmequivalence.Thiswordhasalonghistoryandhasmanymeaningsindifferenttimesandindifferentfields.AmericanSociety
ThomasKuhn,asociologyscientist,broughtmeaningtosociologyandbecameamemberofaparticularcommunity
Thesumofacceptedbeliefs,acceptedvalues,andtechniques.Edgar,aFrenchscholar,thinksthatone
Peoplerecognize,think,andactontheparadigmthatcultureiswrittenonthemselves.Itguides,rules,controls
Theorganizationofindividualreasoningandtheorganizationofthosewhofollowtheparadigmaresystematicallyorganized.Theoreticalcirclesinourcountrybelievethat
Itisthecommonbeliefofagroupofscientistsinaparticularsubjectordiscipline
Theircommonbasictheories,basicviewsandbasicmethodsprovideacommontheoreticalmodelforthem
Andproblemsolvingframeworks,thusformingacommontraditionofthediscipline,andforthedevelopmentofthediscipline
Setacommoncourse.Limitedtothelengthandcognitivelevelofthearticle,wetakeintoconsiderationtheword"
Atthesametime,itisbasedonChineselegaltheoryandjudicialpractice,fromontology,methodologyand
Theextensionofepistemologytodefinethejudgeasthiscommunityjusticeparadigm,andasaguide,thetrial
Thetrialprocessisatentativeexploration.
Ontology:
thesubjectiveandobjectiverelationsinthetrial-basedonfacts
TheGermanphilosopherKantwillbearationalpersoncalled"
chasingmakingprimitiveability"
and"
primitive,isplaced
Inthefirstthing"
.Forthejudgeasatypicalrationalperson,thefactofthecaseiscalled
Theabilitytotracethe"
factsofthecase"
isthetrialofthe"
original"
Reason.Therefore,inontology,thetrialattachesimportancetotherelationshipbetweensubjectandobject,andregardsobjectas
Theobjectofbeingoutsideistheobjectofhumanbeing,andthesubjectusestheobjectofunderstandingtoconquertheobject.Thesubjecthere"
Notonlytheplaintiff,thedefendant,butmoreimportantly,thejudge:
theobjecthereisthefactofthecase,too
Itcanbesaidthattheobjectoftrialisthedisputethatleadstothetrial.
Thesubjectiveandobjectiverelationsinthetrialareconcentratedinadynamicreasoningprocess.Nomatterwhatauthorityitis
Modeloradversarymodel,andtheactionisundertheparticipationofthejudgeandthepartiesandtheiragents
Proceedinaccordancewithlegalprocedures.Thelegalexpertsofbothpartiesandtheiremploylawyersintheirowninterests
Actinsearchofthebestevidenceprovidedbythelaw,andmakethemostfavourableexplanationtoone'
sown.Judgepress
Inthetrialprocedure,fromthefactinvestigationtothecourtdebate,aformalreasoningprocessiscompleted:
theapplicationofthelegalnormsis
Thelogicofthesyllogism,thelogicofthecase,thefactthatthecaseistheminorpremise,thecourt'
sdecision
Istheconclusionofthisreasoningprocess.
Itneedstobeexplainedthatthelegalnormisnotonlyalogicalproposition,butalsoajudgmentofauthority
Broken.Atthesametime,becauseofthefactofthecaseandthecourtstatement,thereisnotonlytimeinterval,butalso
Thereisagapbetweenrealityandlanguage.Whatismoreimportantisthat..,
Thejudgeasthethirdpartyandthefactsofthecase
Therearedifferentcognitivebackgroundsamongmanufacturers.Allthismayleadtothefailureofformalreasoningfunction
Theresultisthattheconclusionisfarfromtheobjectivefacts,andmayalsoberelatedtothetermoftheParty(eventhewinningparty)
Farcryfrom.
Weareallspeculative,instinctively,aboutthemostdifficultquestions,theleastofthem
Thefundamentalexplorationoftheproblemexhibitsaparticularpreference.Forthoseobsessedwithusingtrialcasehandling
Thejudge'
sspecialpreferenceisquestionable:
(1)canthelegaltruthbeinfinitelyclosetoobjectivetruth?
as
Thefactthattheobjectivefactsofthecasehavehappened,andthatthepastisimpossibletoreconstruct,thenwhat?
Toknowwhetherajudgmentiscloseorfarfromtheobjectivefacts?
Infact,acourtcaseforacase
Thenumberoftrialsislimited,therefore,thecourt'
scognizanceofthecaseislimited,limitedtrial
Howcanonepossiblyapproachtheobjectivefactsinfinitely?
(2)theheartofthejudge
Areyousureyoucancountonit?
Inthefaceoftheparty'
sactiveoppositionlitigation,thejudge'
sinnerconvictionisnotonly10000
Onemistake,Iamdifficulttodetect,butalsoforthesuddennatureoftherefereeforeshadowed,andmoredifficulttoruleoutthepeople
Reasonabledoubts.Thejudge'
sreasoningonlyappearsinthelinesbetweenthereferee'
spapersandservesastheconclusion
Characterizedbyfinalityandargument.
Two.Methodology:
scientificmetaphysicsintrial-startingfromproposition
Acourtinvestigationofacourtdebate-theprocessofapplyingthelawtothescienceofmetaphysics
Theprocessofapplyingthemethodsofscientificinquiry.Then,thecourt'
sdecisionisnotbasedonfact,because
Inareasoningprocess,thepremiseofaconclusionisoneorseveralknownpropositions,notoneormoreactualones
Rawfacts.Thepropositioninlogicisthefactofthecaseinthelawsuit.Ifthecourt
Ifjudgmentistheprocessoflogicalreasoningofsyllogism,thenitcanonlybethefactofthecase,
Ofcourse,itisatruestatementoffactbyaparty,thatis,atrueproposition.Propositionsandfacts,thefactsoftheparties
Thepropositioniscloselyrelatedtothefactofaparticularcase,thatis,thepropositionisalwaysaboutthefacts,thesubjectoftheparties
Zhangisalwaysonthefactsofthecase,eventhetruthofthepropositiondependsonwhetheritagreeswiththefacts,thatis,when
Andonlywhenthedefendantnotalsoowetheplaintiff,thedefendantowe"
theclaimistrue,canmake
Groundsforjudgment.
Therehavebeencountlessfactsatdifferenttimes,andatthesametime,countlessdifferentplaceshavetakenplace
Infact,thesedividedfactsarespecificandunique,andthefactsareoccurringatthesametime
Itwillbepermanentlyandirrevocablyeliminated,forexample,thefactthattheplaintiffhaslentthedefendant100yuanmusthavebeenissued
Thefactofborrowingmoneyataparticulartime,place,andeverydetailofborrowingmoney,
Suchasnegotiation,signing,counting,issuedIOUs,side,sidealsodisappearing.Andlife
Theword"
problem"
referstoasentencethatconformstocertainnorms,andsomepeoplerefertoitas"
themeaningofsuchasentence,butwithout"
Onhowtounderstand,propositionsarerelatedtoourlanguagestatements,whichisourdescriptionoffacts,andalife
Theproblemdoesnotloseitsidentityatdifferenttimesandindifferentspaces.
Thetruthitselfisnottrueorfalse.Theso-called"
objectivefacts"
infact,istheemphasisontheobjectivityofthefacts,
Itdoesnotmeanthatthereisacorrespondingsubjectivefact"
.Apropositionisastatementofourunderstandingofobjectivefacts,
Judgment,andourknowledge,judgmentmaybecorrect,mayalsobewrong,therefore,thepropositionistrueandfalse
Branch.Apropositionagreeswithafact,atrueproposition,orafalseproposition,aboutthetruthortruthofaproposition
Infact,thefactsofthecaseitselfareneithertruenorfalse,andonlytheclaimsofthepartiesaretrueandfalse
Inlitigation,thefactthattheevidenceneedstobeprovedisthefactofthepartyratherthanthefactofthecase
Obtainajudgmentthatisadvantageoustooneself;
needevidencetoproveone'
sopinionordisprovetheother'
sclaim.
Allexactknowledgebelongstoscience.Thetheoryofsystemscienceastheobject,becauseitisalways
Ifwedividethewholeintoparts,wewillalwayshavetheonesidednessthatcannotbecompletelyeliminated,namely,metaphysics.hold
Innature,allkindsofthingsandprocessesareisolated,leavinggreatandgeneralconnectionstoinvestigate,
Thus,notfromthestateofmotion,butfromthestateofstillness;
nottothinkofthemasessentially
Somethingthatischanged,butsomethingthatisimmutable;
notfromalivingstate,butfromastateofdeath
Investigate。
ThismethodofinvestigationwastransplantedfromintothephilosophybyBaconandRock
Thepeculiarlimitationsofthepastfewcenturies,themetaphysicalwayofthinking.Iwasclearlytheexactknowledgeofthelaw,
Belongtoscientificcategory.Thetrialistoisolatethefactsofthecaseandseizethemainlineoftheapplicationofthelaw
Itisnotpossibletoavoidmetaphysics,asitisfromstatic,eternal,deadthings.
Three.Epistemology:
therulesofevidenceintria
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 民事审判哲学范式初论On the philosophical paradigm of civil trial 民事 审判 哲学 范式 On
链接地址:https://www.bdocx.com/doc/20969461.html