整理SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全Word文档格式.docx
- 文档编号:20566097
- 上传时间:2023-01-24
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:6
- 大小:18.72KB
整理SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全Word文档格式.docx
《整理SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全Word文档格式.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《整理SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全Word文档格式.docx(6页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
Respondstothereviewer'
scomments:
Reviewer#1:
1。
Responsetocomment:
(……简要列出意见……)
Response:
×
×
2.Responsetocomment:
。
...。
逐条意见回答,切忌一定不能有遗漏
针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用:
Weareverysorryforournegligenceof……。
.。
Weareverysorryforourincorrectwriting……..。
ItisreallytrueasReviewersuggestedthat……
WehavemadecorrectionaccordingtotheReviewer’scomments.
Wehavere-writtenthispartaccordingtotheReviewer'
ssuggestion
AsReviewersuggestedthat……
ConsideringtheReviewer'
ssuggestion,wehave……
最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见:
Specialthankstoyouforyourgoodcomments。
Reviewer#2:
同上述
Reviewer#3:
Otherchanges:
Line60—61,thestatementsof“……”werecorrectedas“…………”
2。
Line107,“……”wasadded
3。
Line129,“……”wasdeleted
Wetriedourbesttoimprovethemanuscriptandmadesomechangesinthemanuscript.Thesechangeswillnotinfluencethecontentandframeworkofthepaper.Andherewedidnotlistthechangesbutmarkedinredinrevisedpaper。
WeappreciateforEditors/Reviewers’warmworkearnestly,andhopethatthecorrectionwillmeetwithapproval。
Onceagain,thankyouverymuchforyourcommentsandsuggestions
以下是审稿人意见和本人的回复。
与大家分享。
从中可以看出,这位审稿人认真读了文章,提出很多宝贵的意见。
这些意见
分布在文章的各个地方。
我很诧异有人真正读了我的文章.看到这些意见,
我觉得很感激,不是因为接收文章的原因,而是这些意见能真正有助于提高
文章的质量。
从中还看出,回答审稿人问题的“技巧”。
对于回答问题,有的人就是一味反驳,却不加改进.
记得ACSStyleGuide里面说,当审稿人问到问题的,哪怕是他理解错误,这
也说明作者这么写,其他读者也会理解错误,引起歧义。
因此,作者就是要
修改句子,使表达不引起歧义。
因此:
有时间一味反驳,还不如指出具体改进在第几页、第几段。
============================================
Reviewers'
comments:
Reviewer#3:
Whilerevisingthescript,itistobesuggestedthatauthorshouldclearlyindicatetheaim&scopeofthestudyandwhilemakingconclusion,itistobementionedhowthestudyisusefulforthepracticalpurposes。
Inadditionthefollowingarethefewsuggestions/comments,whichmaybeincludedwhilerevision。
1.Introductionpartfirstparalastline,authormustavoidtowriteambiguousstatementi。
e.,muchworkisstillahead,mayindicateproperly。
2.Authorcouldnotdemonstratethereasonwhy,toselecttheorganiccompoundsuchasethylpyruvateforthisstudy?
Experimentalpart:
Itisdifficulttounderstandthein—situRAIRSexperimentswithhomemadeliquid-solidRAIRScell.Moredetailedinformationmaybeusefulfortheothersthosewhoareworkinginthearea.Photographoftheassembledcellmaybeincluded.
4。
Thedescriptiongivenfortheexperimentalsetup(page4)canbepresentedbyflowdiagraminstead,asaneasetounderstandthesetup。
5.ReslutsPart(Page6):
"
COadlayerswithidenticalmonolayercoverages”,themonolayercoverage,isitbeenperformedwithsomeadsorptionmodel?
Further,itwassuggestedthatCO-saturatedPtsurface,butnotmentionedaboutthesaturationexperiments。
Isitobtainedafter60minofCObubbling?
6.Page12,2ndpara:
ThedisplacementofEtPybyCCl4flushing,isitconfirmedbytheEtPypeaks?
Ifso,ithastobementionedclearlyinthepara。
Alsointhesamepara,authorreferredforFig。
7aand7bbutinthefigures,itdidn’tappear,onlyfigure7appeared。
Ifeelitrefersforfigure7,portionAandB,tobecorrected.Similarly,inthetextreferredthefig2a,2b.etcbutonthefiguresheetitismentionedas2A,2B。
etc.tobecorrected。
7.Page14,1stpara:
’contaminationofthePtsurfacebycorrosionofo—ringsinhighconcentrationEtPy'
,butthestatementhasnotbeensupportedbyotherevidence/literature。
8。
Pages14through17:
theobservedreactivityofvarioussolventsforadsorbedCOonthePtsurface(figs3&4)hastobediscussedmoreprecisely.Thisreviewerisunabletofollowthereasonwhytheyshoweddifferentreactivity,isitprincipallyduetotheorganicmoieties,orduetotheimpuritiesofcommerciallyavailablechemicalsoramixedeffect.Ithastobeclearlydemonstrated,however,theonlyexperimentperformedwithCO/water?
CCl4woulddifficulttodescribeitindetail.
9。
Theauthortrytorestrainwithrepeatedargumentsinthetexte.g。
,page3para1:
Itwasgeneralizedthat.。
..。
,alsoappearedonpage21firstpara.
10。
Captionsofthefiguresaretoolong,thedetaileddescriptionalreadygiveninthetext,hencewouldnotbeincludedhere.Captionsshouldbeshortandcrispy。
===============================================
DearEditor,
Iquiteappreciateyourfavoriteconsiderationandthereviewer’sinsightfulcomments.NowIhaverevisedtheJCIS-06—247exactlyaccordingtothereviewer'
scomments,andfoundthesecommentsareveryhelpful.Ihopethisrevisioncanmakemypapermoreacceptable。
Therevisionswereaddressedpointbypointbelow。
[general]TheobjectiveofthisresearchwasaddedatthebeginningofthethirdparagraphofIntroduction。
HowthestudyisusefulforpracticalpurposeswasaddedattheendofConclusionasoneparagraph。
[1]Ambiguousstatementi。
e。
,“muchworkisstillahead”wasdeleted.
[2]Ethylpyruvatewasusedhereasatypicalcompound(containingtwocarbonylgroups)todemonstratethefeasibilityofusingourdiagnosingtooltodetectlow—coverageCO(comingfromdecarbonylationofEtPy)attheliquid—solidinterface.EtPyisareactantusedinliquid—phasechiralcatalysis,andslightdecompositionofEtPytoadsorbedCOwasreportedtoinfluencethecatalyticperformance。
Inaddition,bystudyingthat,wecandirectlycompareourresultswithpreviousstudies。
MoredetailsinthefirstparagraphofSection3。
[3]TheIRcellwasdesignedaccordingtotheIRcellsusedbymanyelectrochemicalworkers.Referenceswereadded。
AphotowasgivenintheSupportingInformation。
[4]AflowdiagramoftheexperimentalsetupwasgiveninthenewFig.1。
[5]TheCOadsorptionexperimentswereperformedinthesameadsorptionmode,bybubblingCOthroughacleanPtsurfaceindifferentdaystoachievethesamesaturationcoverageofCO.InitialexperimentsindicatedthatgiventheCObubblingratewas0。
85cm3/min,COcansaturateonPtafter30-45min.WebubbleCOfor60mintoguaranteethesameCOcoverage.IfwebubbleCOformoretime,orifweincreasetheCOflowingrateseveraltimes,theCOsaturationcoveragedoesn'
tchange,indicating60minisalreadyenough。
AfigureshowingtheCOuptakeasafunctionofbubblingtimewasgivenintheSupportingInformation。
[6]ThedisplacementofEtPybyCCl4wasconfirmedbytheremovingofEtPypeaks.ThementionofFig.7aand7betc.throughoutthetextwereallcorrected。
[7]ItisknownthatsomesolventssuchasacetonecancorrodetheVitono—ring。
Wesawthedamageofo-ringafterusinghigh—concentrationEtPy.AreferencetotheVitono-ringinformationwasgiven.
[8]Theobservedreactivitytrendisduetoacombinationofbotheffects,withtheaccumulationoforganicmoietiesonPtsurfaceduringnumerousflushingcyclesthemoreimportantreason.Afewpropersentenceswereaddedtoclaritythispoint.
[9]TherepeatedargumentsinthefirstparagraphinSection4.3weredeleted.
[10]Thetoo—longcaptionsweresignificantlyshortened.
Inall,Ifoundthereviewer’scommentsarequitehelpful,andIrevisedmypaperpoint—by-point。
Thankyouandthereviewagainforyourhelp!
==============================================
结果:
http:
//dx。
doi.org/10.1016/j。
jcis.2006。
09。
005
欢迎浏览:
OrganicChemistryonSolidSurfaces(Review)
Z.Ma,F.Zaera*,SurfaceScenceReports61(2006)229—281.
ScienceDirectTOP25HottestArticlesinChemistry
http:
//dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surfrep.2006。
03.001
CI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板
DearEditorsandReviewers:
Thankyouforyourletterandforthereviewers’commentsconcerningourmanuscriptentitled“PaperTitle"
(ID:
Wehavestudiedcommentscarefullyandhavemadecorrectionwhichwehopemeetwithapproval.Revisedportionaremarkedinredinthepaper。
Respondstothereviewer’scomments:
1.Responsetocomment:
Response:
逐条意见回答,切忌一定不能有遗漏
Weareverysorryforourincorrectwriting……...
WehavemadecorrectionaccordingtotheReviewer’scomments。
Wehavere—writtenthispartaccordingtotheReviewer'
ssuggestion,wehave……
Specialthankstoyouforyourgoodcomments.
Reviewer#3:
Line60-61,thestatementsof“……”werecorrectedas“…………"
Line107,“……"
wasadded
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 整理 SCI 修改稿 回答 审稿人 意见 范文 模板 大全
![提示](https://static.bdocx.com/images/bang_tan.gif)