国际商法教程案例翻译文档格式.docx
- 文档编号:20465902
- 上传时间:2023-01-23
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:5
- 大小:21.55KB
国际商法教程案例翻译文档格式.docx
《国际商法教程案例翻译文档格式.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《国际商法教程案例翻译文档格式.docx(5页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
Thedefendants,Boots,operatedaself-servicepharmacy.Onepartofthestorewascalledthe”ToiletDept.,”andanotherthe”Chemists‘Dept.”Onoeftheshelvesinthechemists'
departmentdrugs,includingproprietarymedicines,weredisplayedinindividualpackagesorcontainerswithanindicationofthepriceofeach.Onesectionoftheshelvesinthechemists'
deparementwasdevotedexclusivelytodrugswhichwereincludedin,orwhichcontainedsubstancesineludedin,PartIofthe
PoisonsAct,1933;
…
Thedefendantss'
taffincludedamanager,aregisteredpharmacist,threeassistantsandtwocashiers,andduringthetimewhenthepremiseswereopenforthesaleofdrugsthemanager,theregisteredpharmacist,andoneormoreoftheassistantswerepresentintheroom.Inordertoleavethepremisesthecustomerhadtopassbyoneoftwoexits,ateachofwhichwasacashdeskwhereacashierwasstationedwhoscrurinizedthearticlesselectedbythecustomer,assessedthevalueandacceptedpayment.Thechemists'
departmentwasunderthepersonalcontroloftheregisteredpharmacist,whocarriedoutallhisdutiesatthepremisessubjecttothedirectionsofasuperintendentappointedbythedefendantsinaccordancewiththeprovisionsofsection9oftheAct.
Thepharmacistwasstationednearthepoisonsection,wherehiscertificateofregistrationwasconspicuouslydisplayed,andwasinviewofthecashdesks.Ineverycaseinvolvingthesaleofadrugthepharmacistsupervisedthatpartofthetransactionwhichtookplaceatthecashdeskandwasauthorizedbythedefendantstopreventatthatstageofthetransaction,ifhethoughtfit,anycustomerfromremovinganydrugfromthepremises.Nostepsweretakenbythedefendantstoinformthecustomers,beforetheyselected
anyarticlewhichtheywishedtopurchase,ofthepharmacist'
sauthorization.
OnApril13,1951,atthedefendantspremises,twocustomers,followingtheprocedureoutlinedabove,respectivelypurchasedabottlecontainingamedicineknownascompoundsyrupofhypophosphites,containing0.01%W/Vstrychnine,andabottlecontainingmedicineknownasfamelsyrup,containing0.23%W/Vcodeine,bothofwhichsubstancesarepoisonsineludedinPartIofthePoisonsList…
ThequestionfortheopinionofthecourtwaswhetherthesalesinstancedonApril13,1951,wereeffectedbyorunderthesupervisionofaregisteredpharmacist,inaccordancewiththeprovisionsofsection18
(1)(a)(iii)ofthePharmacyandPoisonsAct.1933.
TheLordChiefJusticeansweredthequestionintheaffirmative[[1952]2Q.B.795,[1952]2All
E.R.456].ThePharmaceuticalSocietyappealed.
SomervellL.J….TheplaintiffsarethePhaimaceuticalSociety,incorporatedbyRoyalcharter.OneoftheirdutiesistotakeallreasonablestepstoenforcetheprovisionsoftheAct.Theprovisioninquestioniscontainedinsection18.[HisLordshipreadthesection,statedthefacts,andcontinued:
]Itisnotdisputedthatinachemist'
sshopwherethisself-servicesystemdoesnotprevailacustomermaygoinandaskayoungwomanassistant,whowillnotherselfbearegisteredpharmacist,foroneofthesearticlesonthelist,andthetransationmaybecompletedandthearticlepaidfor,althoughtheregisteredpharmacist,whowillnodoubtbeonthepremises,willnotknowanythinghimselfofthetransaction,unlesstheassistantservingthecustomer,orthecustomer,requirestoputaquestiontohim.ItisrightthatIshouldemphasize,asdidtheLordChiefJustice,thatthesearenotdangerousdrugs.Theyaresubstanceswhichcontainverysmallproportionsofpoison,andIimaginethatmanyofthemarethetypeofdrugwhichhasawarningastowhatdosesaretobetaken.Theyaredrugswhichcanbeobtained,underthelaw,withoutadoctor'
sprescription.
Thepointtakenbytheplaintiffsisthis:
itissaidthatthepurchaseiscompleteifandwhenacustomergoingroundtheshelvestakesanarticleandthattherefore,ifthatisright,whenthecustomercomestothepaydesk,havingcompletedthetourofthepremises,theregisteredpharmacist,ifsominded,hasnopowertosay:
”Thisdrugoughtnottobesoldtothiscustomer.”Whetherandinwhatcircumstanceshewouldhavethatpowerweneednotinquire,butonecan,ofcourse,seethatthereisadifferenceifsupervisioncanonlybeexercisedatatimewhenthecontractiscompleted,
IagreewiththeLordChiefJusticeineverythingthathesaid,butIwillputthemattershortlyinmyownwords.Whethertheviewcontendedforbytheplaintiffsisarightviewdependsonwhatarethelegalimplicationsofthislayout—theinvitationtothecustomer.Isacontracttoberegardedasbeingcompletedwhenthearticleisputintothereceptacle,oristhistoberegardedasamoreorganizedwayofdoingwhatisdonealreadyinmanytypesofshops-andabooksellerisperhapsthebestexample-namely,enablingcustomerstohavefreeaccesstowhatisintheshop,tolookatthedifferentarticles,andthen,ultimately,havinggottheoneswhichtheywishtobuy,tocomeuptotheassistantsayingwantthis?
”Theassistantin999timesoutof1,000says“Thatisallright,”andthemoneypassesandthetransactioniscompleted.Iagree・・・thatinthecaseofanordinaryshop,althoughgoodsaredisplayedanditisintendedthatcustomersshouldgoandchoosewhattheywant,thecontractisnotcompleteduntil,thecustomerhavingindicatedthearticleswhichheneeds,theshopkeeper,orsomeoneonhisbehalf,acceptsthatoffer.Thenthecontractiscompleted.Icanseenoreasonatall,thatbeingclearlythenormalposition,fordrawinganydiffererntimplicationasaresultofthislayout.TheLordChiefJustice,Ithink,expressedoneofthemostformidabledifficultiesinthewayoftheplaintiffsco'
ntentionwhenhepointedoutthat,iftheplaintiffsareright,onceanarticlehasbeenplacedinthereceptaclethecustomerhimselfisboundandwouldhavenoright,withoutpayingforthefirstarticle,tosubstituteanarticlewhichhesawlaterofasimilarkindandwhichheperhapspreferred.Icanseenoreasonforimplyingfromthisself—servicearrangementanyimplicationotherthan...thatitisaconvenientmethodofenablingcustomerstoseewhatthereisandchoose,andpossiblyputbackandsubstitute,articleswhichtheywishtohave,andthentogouptothecashierandoffertobuywhattheyhavesofarchosen.Onthatconclusionthecasefails,becauseitisadmittedthattherewassupervisioninthesenserequiredbytheActandattheappropriatemomentoftime.Forthesereasons,inmyopinion,theappealshouldbedismissed.
BirkettL.J.[notedthatitwasthedutyofthePharmaceuticalSocieytoenforcethispartoftheActandcontinued:
]Thetwowomencustomersinthiscaseeachtookaparticularpackagecontainingpoisonfromtheparticularshelf,putitintoherbasket,cametotheexitandtherepaid.Itissaid,ontheonehand,thatwhenthecustomertakesthepackagefromthepoisonsectionandputsitintoherbasketthesalethereandthentakeplace.Ontheotherhand,itissaidthedoesnottakeplaceuntilthatcustomer,whohasplacedthatpackageinthebasket,comestotheexit.
TheLordChiefJusticedealtwiththematterinthisway,andIwouldliketodaopthiswords[[1952]2Q.B.795at802]:
Itseemstome,therefore,thatthetransactionisinnowaydifferentfromthenormaltransactioninashopinwhichthereisnoself--servicescheme.Iamquitesatisfieditwouldbewrongtosaythattheshopkeeperismakinganoffertoselleveryarticleintheshopuoanypersonwhomightcomeinandthatthatpersoncaninsistonbuyinganyarticlebysaying“Iacceptyouroffer.”
Thenhewentontodealwiththeillustrationofthebookshop,andcontinued:
Therefore,inmyopinion,themerefactthatacustomerpicksupabottleofmedicinefromtheshelvesinthiscasedoesnotamounttoanacceptanceofanoffertosell.Itisanofferbythecustomertobuyandthereisnosaleeffecteduntilthebuyer'
soffertobuyisacceptedbythe
acceptanceoftheprice.Theoffer,theacceptanceoftheprice,andthereforethesaletakeplaceunderthesupervisionofthepharmacist.Thatissufficienttosatisfytherequirementsofthesectionforbyusingthewords“thesaleiseffectedby,orunderthesupervisionof,aregisteredpharmacist”theActenvisagesthathesalemaybeeffectedbysomeonenotapharmacist.Ithink,too,thatthesaleiseffectedunderhissupervisionifheisinapositiontosay“Youmustnothavethat:
thatcontainspoison,so”thatinanycase,evenifIwerewrongintheviewthatIhavetakenonthequestionastowhenthesalewascompleted,anditwascompleted,anditwascompletedwhenthecustomertookthearticlefromtheshelf,itwouldstillbeeffectedunderthesupervisionofthepharmacistwithinthemeaningofsection18.Iagreewiththat,andIagreethatthisappealoughttobedismissed.
[RomerL.J.deliveredaconcurringjudgment.]医药学会大不列颠诉靴现金化学家(sourhern)有限公司被告,靴子,开办了一个自我-服务药房。
一部份商店被称为“卫生部,”另一个“化学家”部。
”一个架子在化学系药物,包括专利的药品,显示在每个包装或容器的指示每一个价格。
一部分的货架的化学家处是专门为药物,其中包括在,或其中部分包括物质,1的毒药,1933;
…被告的工作人员包括一个经理,注册药剂师,三助理和2名收银员,并在当时的房屋开放药品销售经理,注册药剂师,和一个或更多的助手们在房间。
要离开单位客户已通过一个出口,在其中每个现金出纳台,驻扎谁scrurinized文章由客户选定,评估的价值和接受的付款。
化学家部是根据个人控制的注册药剂师,谁进行了所有他的职责在房屋的指示者由被告根据本法第9行为。
药剂师驻守附近的毒药,在其注册证明书是突出显示,并鉴于现金桌。
在每一个案件涉及出售毒品药剂师监督,交易的一部分发生在收款台和被授权的被告以防止在这个阶段的交易,如果他认为合适的任何客户,消除任何药物的处所。
没有采取了步骤,由被告人检举客户,才选定任何文章,他们希望购买的,药剂师的授权。
1951年4月13日,在被告的处所,两家客户后,上述程序,分别购买了一瓶含有医学上称为次磷酸盐复合糖浆,含0.01%瓦特/五宁,和一瓶
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 国际 商法 教程 案例 翻译