Taxchapter 8Word文档下载推荐.docx
- 文档编号:17999129
- 上传时间:2022-12-12
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:47
- 大小:60.66KB
Taxchapter 8Word文档下载推荐.docx
《Taxchapter 8Word文档下载推荐.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Taxchapter 8Word文档下载推荐.docx(47页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
SOLUTIONSMANUAL
DiscussionQuestions:
1.[LO1]Whatisan“ordinaryandnecessary”businessexpenditure?
“Ordinary”and“necessary”implythatanexpensemustbecustomaryandhelpful,respectively.Becausethesetermsaresubjective,thetestsareambiguous.However,ordinaryisinterpretedbythecourtsasincludingexpenseswhichmaybeunusualforaspecifictaxpayer(butnotforthattypeofbusiness)andnecessaryisnotinterpretedasonlyessentialexpenses.Theselimitscanbecontrastedwiththereasonablelimitonamountsandthebonafiderequirementforprofitmotivation.
2.[LO1]Iscostofgoodssolddeductibleasabusinessexpenseforabusinesssellinginventory?
Explain.
No.Underthereturnofcapitalprincipal,costofgoodssoldrepresentsareductioningrossincomeratherthanabusinessexpense.Forexample,ifataxpayersellsinventoryfor$100,000andreportsacostofgoodssoldof$40,000,thebusiness’sgrossincomeis$60,000($100,000–40,000)not$100,000.
3.[LO1]Tomisanattorneywhooftenrepresentsindividualsinjuredwhileworking(workerliabilityclaims).ThisyearDeweyspent$50onabookentitledPlumbingForDummiesandpaid$500totakeacourseonplumbingresidencesandrentalhousing.Canyouimaginecircumstancesinwhichtheseexpenditureswouldbedeductibleas“ordinaryandnecessary”foranattorney.Explain.
“Ordinary”and“necessary”implythatanexpensemustbecustomaryandhelpful,respectively.Becausethesetermsaresubjective,thetestsareambiguous.However,ordinaryisinterpretedbythecourtsasincludingexpenseswhichmaybeunusualforaspecifictaxpayer(butnotforthattypeofbusiness)andnecessaryisnotinterpretedasonlyessentialexpenses.Tommayrepresentaplumberandincurredtheseexpendituresohecanbetterunderstandandexplainhowhisclientwasinjuredonthejob.Inthiscase,theexpenseswouldbebothordinaryandnecessarytoTom’spracticeasanattorney,andthereforedeductible.
4.[LO1]Jakeisaprofessionaldogtrainerwhopurchasesandtrainsdogsforusebylawenforcementagencies.LastyearJakepurchased500bagsofdogfoodfromalargepetfoodcompanyatanaveragecostof$30perbag.Thisyear,however,Jakepurchased500bagsofdogfoodfromalocalpetfoodcompanyatanaveragecostof$45perbag.UnderwhatcircumstanceswouldtheIRSlikelychallengethecostJake’sdogfoodasunreasonable?
Reasonablenessisanissueoffactandcircumstance,andextravaganceisdifficulttodeterminedefinitely.However,acommontestforreasonablenessiswhethertheexpenditureiscomparabletoanarm'
slengthamount–apricechargedbyobjective(unrelated)individualswhodonotreceiveanyincidentalpersonalbenefits.Reasonablenessismostlikelytobeanissuewhenapaymentismadetoarelatedindividualorthetaxpayerenjoyssomepersonalbenefitincidentaltotheexpenditure.Hence,theIRSismostlikelytochallengethecostofthedogfoodiftheJakeorhisfamilycontrolledthelocalpetfoodcompany.
5.[LO2]Whatkindsofdeductionsareprohibitedasamatterofpublicpolicy?
WhymightCongressdeemitimportanttodisallowdeductionsforexpendituresagainstpublicpolicy?
TheIRClistsbribes,kickbacks,and“other”illegalpaymentsasnondeductible.Congressdidn’twantthetaxbenefitsassociatedwithdeductionstobenefitorsubsidizewrongdoing.Ofcourse,thisrationaledoesn’treallyexplaintheprohibitionagainstdeductingpoliticalcontributionswhichisprobablybetterexplainedbythepotentialperceptionthatpoliticaleffortsarebeingsubsidizedbytaxpayers.
6.[LO2]Provideanexampleofanexpenseassociatedwiththeproductionoftax-exemptincome,andexplainwhatmighthappenifCongressrepealedtheprohibitionagainstdeductingexpensesincurredtoproducetax-exemptincome.
Twocommonexamplesareinterestexpenseassociatedwithdebtusedtopurchasemunicipalbondsandlifeinsurancepremiumspaidonkeymaninsurance.Ifthisprohibitionwererepealed,thentaxpayerswouldhaveanincentivetoborrowtoinvestinmunicipalbondsorborrowtoinvestinemployeelifeinsurance.Thisformerpracticewouldleadtohigherdemandformunicipalbonds(lessyield)andlessrevenueforthegovernment.Thelatterpracticewouldleadtohigherdemandforinsurance(higherpremiums?
)andlessrevenueforthegovernment.Bothpracticescouldleadtoaperceptionofinequitybetweenthosetaxpayersabletoutilizethetaxarbitragetoreducetaxesandthosewhocouldnotusethepractice.
7.[LO2]{Research}Jerryisaself-employedrockstarandthisyearheexpended$1,000onspecial“flashy”clothesandoutfits.Jerrywouldliketodeductthecostoftheseclothesaswork-relatedbecausetheclothesarenotacceptabletoJerry’ssenseoffashion.UnderwhatcircumstancescanJerrydeductthecostoftheseworkclothes?
Taxpayersmaydeductthecostofuniformsorspecialclothingtheyuseintheirbusinesswhentheclothingisnotappropriatetowearasordinaryclothingoutsidetheplaceofbusiness.InJerry’scase,theflashyrockoutfitscouldbeanalogoustospecialuniformsorprotectivegarmentsandcouldbedeductible.SeeD.Texchner,TCMemo1997-498.ErhardSeminarTraining,TCMemo1986-526providesanexampleofclothesthatwerenotdeductiblebecausetheywereappropriatefor
normalwear.However,thecostofclothingwouldnotlikelybedeductibleiftheclotheswereunacceptablesolelybecauseofthetaxpayer’ssenseoffashion.
8.[LO2]Jimmyisasoleproprietorofasmalldrycleaningbusiness.ThismonthJimmypaidforhisgroceriesbywritingchecksfromthecheckingaccountdedicatedtothedrycleaningbusiness.WhydoyousupposeJimmyisusinghisbusinesscheckingaccountratherthanhispersonalcheckingaccounttopayforpersonalexpenditures?
Jimmymightbetryingtoreducehisbankchargesbyusingoneaccountforbothpersonalandbusinessexpenditures,buthecouldalsobetryingtodisguisepersonalexpendituresasbusinessexpenses.Bycomminglingbusinessandpersonalexpenditures,Jimmywillneedtoseparatepersonalandbusinessexpendituresbeforeclaiminganybusinessdeductions.
9.[LO2]Timemploysthreesalesrepresentativeswhooftentakeclientstodinnerandprovideentertainmentinordertoincreasesales.ThisyearTimreimbursedtherepresentatives$2,500forthecostofmealsand$8,250forthecostofentertainingclients.DescribetheconditionsunderwhichTimcanclaimdeductionsformealsandentertainment.
Todeductanyportionofthecostofamealasabusinessexpense,theamountmustbereasonableunderthecircumstances,thetaxpayer(oranemployee)mustbepresentwhenthemealisfurnished,andthemealmustbedirectlyassociatedwiththeactiveconductofthetaxpayer’sbusiness.Similartobusinessmeals,entertainmentassociatedwithbusinessactivitiescontainsasignificantelementofenjoyment.Hence,only50%ofallowablebusinessentertainmentmaybedeductedasabusinessexpense.Further,entertainmentdeductionsareallowableonlyif“businessassociates”areentertained,theamountspaidarereasonableinamount,andtheentertainmentiseither“directlyrelated”or“associatedwith”theactiveconductofbusiness
10.[LO2]Jennyuseshercarforbothbusinessandpersonalpurposes.Shepurchasedtheautothisyearanddrove11,000milesonbusinesstripsand9,000milesforpersonaltransportation.DescribehowJennywilldeterminetheamountofdeductibleexpensesassociatedwiththeauto.
Becauseonlytheexpenserelatingtobusinessuseisdeductible,thetaxpayermustallocatetheexpensesbetweenthebusinessandpersonaluseportions.Acommonmethodofallocationisrelativeuse.InthisinstanceJennywouldcalculatethebusinessportionbasedupontheratioofbusinessmilestototalmiles(11/20or55percent).Shewouldthendeductthecostsofoperatingthevehicleforbusinesspurposesplusdepreciationonthebusinessportion(55percent)ofthevehicle’staxbasis.Alternatively,inlieuofdeductingthesecosts,Jennymaysimplydeductastandardamountforeachbusinessmileshedrives.Thestandardmileagerate
representstheper-milecostofoperatinganautomobile(includingdepreciationorleasepayments).
11.[LO1,LO2]Whatexpensesaredeductiblewhenataxpayercombinesbothbusinessandpersonalactivitiesonatrip?
Howdotherulesforinternationaltraveldifferfromtherulesfordomestictravel?
Ifthetaxpayerhasbothbusinessandpersonalmotivesforatrip,buttheprimaryordominantmotiveisbusiness,thetaxpayermaydeductthetransportationcoststogettotheplaceofbusiness,butshemaydeductonlymeals(50%),lodging,transportationonsite,andincidentalexpendituresforthebusinessportionofthetravel.Ifthetaxpayer’sprimarypurposeforthetripispersonal,thetaxpayermaynotdeducttransportationcoststotraveltoandfromthelocationbutthetaxpayermaydeductmeals(50%),lodging,transportation,andincidentalexpendituresforthebusinessportionofthetrip.Forinternationaltravelinexcessofoneweek,thetaxpayermustallocatethecostofthetransportationbetweenpersonal(nondeductible)andbusiness(deductible)activities.Taxpayersgenerallydeterminethenondeductibleportionofthetransportationcostsbymultiplyingthetravelcostsbyaratioofpersonalactivitydaystototaldaystraveling.
12.[LO2]ClydelivesandoperatesasoleproprietorshipinDallas,Texas.ThisyearClydefounditnecessarytotraveltoFortWorth(about25milesaway)forlegitimatebusinessreasons.IsClyde’striplikelytoqualifyas“awayfromhome,”andwhywouldthisdesignation
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- Taxchapter