英文审稿意见Word文件下载.docx
- 文档编号:17542579
- 上传时间:2022-12-07
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:12
- 大小:22.48KB
英文审稿意见Word文件下载.docx
《英文审稿意见Word文件下载.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《英文审稿意见Word文件下载.docx(12页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
furthermore,anexplanationofwhytheauthorsdidthesevariousexperimentsshouldbeprovided.
3、对于研究设计的rationale:
also,therearefewexplanationsoftherationaleforthestudydesign.
4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨:
theconclusionsareoverstated.forexample,thestudydidnotshowifthesideeffectsfrominitialcopperburstcanbeavoidwiththepolymerformulation.
5、对hypothesis的清晰界定:
ahypothesisneedstobepresented。
6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/定义概念:
whatwastherationaleforthefilm/sbfvolumeratio?
7、对研究问题的定义:
trytosettheproblemdiscussedinthispaperinmoreclear,writeonesectiontodefinetheproblem
8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literaturereview:
thetopicisnovelbuttheapplicationproposedisnotsonovel.
9、对claim,如a>b的证明,verification:
thereisnoexperimentalcomparisonofthealgorithmwithpreviouslyknownwork,soitisimpossibletojudgewhetherthealgorithmisanimprovementonpreviouswork.
10、严谨度问题:
mnqiseasierthantheprimitivepnqs,howtoprovethat.
11、格式(重视程度):
inaddition,thelistofreferencesisnotinourstyle.itisclosebutnotcompletelycorrect.ihaveattachedapdffilewithinstructionsforauthorswhichshowsexamples.
beforesubmittingarevisionbesurethatyourmaterialisproperlypreparedandformatted.ifyouareunsure,pleaseconsulttheformattingnstructionstoauthorsthataregivenundertheinstructionsandformsbuttoninheupperright-handcornerofthescreen.
12、语言问题(出现最多的问题):
有关语言的审稿人意见:
theauthorsmusthavetheirworkreviewedbyaproper
translation/reviewingservicebeforesubmission;
onlythencanaproperreviewbeperformed.mostsentencescontaingrammaticaland/orspellingmistakesorarenotcompletesentences.
aspresented,thewritingisnotacceptableforthejournal.thereareproblemswithsentencestructure,verbtense,andclauseconstruction.theenglishofyourmanuscriptmustbeimprovedbeforeresubmission.westronglysuggestthatyouobtainassistancefromacolleaguewhoiswell-versedinenglishorwhosenativelanguageisenglish.
pleasehavesomeonecompetentintheenglishlanguageandthesubjectmatterofyourpapergooverthepaperandcorrectit?
thequalityofenglishneedsimproving.
作为审稿人,本不应该把编辑部的这些信息公开(冒风险啊),
但我觉得有些意见值得广大投稿人注意,
就贴出来吧,当然,有关审稿人的名字,email,文章题名信息等就都删除了,以免造成不必要的麻烦!
希望朋友们多评价,其他有经验的审稿人能常来指点大家!
国人一篇文章投mater.类知名国际杂志,
被塞尔维亚一审稿人打25分!
个人认为文章还是有一些创新的,
所以作为审稿人我就给了66分,(这个分正常应该足以发表),提了一些修改意见,望作者修改后发表!
登录到编辑部网页一看,一个文章竟然有六个审稿人,
详细看了下打的分数,60分大修,60分小修,66分(我),25分拒,(好家伙,竟然打25分,有魄力),拒但没有打分(另一国人审),最后一个没有回来!
两个拒的是需要我们反思和学习的!
(括号斜体内容为我注解)
reviewer4
reviewerrecommendationterm:
reject
overallreviewermanuscriptrating:
25
commentstoeditor:
reviewersarerequiredtoentertheirname,affiliationande-mailaddressbelow.pleasenotethisisforadministrativepurposesandwillnotbeseenbytheauthor.
title(prof./dr./mr./mrs.):
prof.
name:
xxx
affiliation:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
manuscriptentitledsynthesisxxx。
。
ithasbeensynthesizedwithanumberofdifferentmethodsandinavarietyofforms.thismanuscriptdoesnotbringanynewknowledgeordataonmaterialspropertyandthereforeonlycontributionmaybeinnovelpreparationmethod,stillthispointisnotelaboratedproperly(seeremark1).presentationandwritingisratherpoor;
thereareseveralstatementsnotsupportedwithdata(forsomeseeremarks2)andevensomeflaws(seeremark3).forthesereasonsisuggesttorejectpaperinthepresentform.
1.thepaperdescribesanewmethodforpreparationofxxxx,but:
-thenewmethodhastobecomparedwithothermethodsforpreparationofxxxxpowders(introduction-literaturedata,resultsanddiscussion-discussion),(通常的写作格式,审稿人实际上很在意的)
-ithastobedescribedwhythismethodisbetterordifferentfromothermethods,(introduction-literaturedata,resultsanddiscussion-discussion),
-ithastobeaddedinthemanuscriptwhatkindofxxxxxxbyothermethodscomparedtothisnovelone(introduction-literaturedata,resultsanddiscussion-discussion),
-ithastobeoutlinedwhatisthebenefitofthismethod(abstract,resultsanddiscussion,conclusions).
(很多人不会写这个地方,大家多学习啊)
2.whendiscussingxrddataxxxauthors
-statethatxxxxx
-statethatxxxx
-thisusuallyhappenswithincreasingsinteringtime,butarethereanydatatopresent,density,particlesize?
(很多人用xrd,结果图放上去就什么都不管了,这是不应该的)
3.whendiscussingluminescencemeasurementsauthorswritexxxxxifthereissecondharmonicinexcitationbeamitwillstaytherenomatterwhattypeofmaterialoneinvestigates!
!
(研究了什么?
?
)
4.英语写作要提高
(这条很多人的软肋,大家努力啊)
reviewer5
n/a
title(prof./dr./mr./mrs.)rof.
(国人)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
deareditor:
thankyouforinvitingmetoevaluatethearticletitledxxxx“.inthispaper,theauthorsinvestigatedtheinfluencesofsinteringconditiononthecrystalstructureandxxxxxx,however,itisdifficultforustounderstandthemanuscriptbecauseofpoorenglishbeingused.
thetextisnotwellarrangedandthelogicisnotclear.exceptenglishwriting,therearemanymistakesinthemanuscriptandtheexperimentalresultsdontshowgoodandnewresults.soirecommendtoyouthatthismanuscriptcannotbeaccepted.thefollowingarethequestionsandsomemistakesinthismanuscript:
(看看总体评价,不达标,很多人被这样郁闷了,当然审稿人也有他的道理)
1.thexxxxxxx.however,thiskindmaterialhadbeeninvestigatedsince1997asmentionedintheauthorsmanuscript,andsimilarworkshadbeenpublishedinsimilarjournals.whatarethenovelfindingsinthepresentwork?
thesynthesismethodandluminescencepropertiesreportedinthismanuscriptdidntsupplyenoughevidencetosupporttheprimenoveltystatement.
(这位作者好猛,竟然翻出自己1997年的中文文章翻译了一边就敢投国际知名杂志,而且没有新的创新!
朋友们也看到了,一稿多发,中文,英文双版发表在网络时代太难了,运气不好
审稿人也是国人,敢情曾经看过你的文章,所以必死无疑,这位作者老兄就命运差了,刚好被审稿人看见,所以毫无疑问被拒,(呵呵,我97年刚上初一没见到这个文章,哈哈))
2.inpage5,theauthormentionedthat:
xxxxbasedonourknowledge,sinteringdescribestheprocesswhenthepowdersbecomeceramics.so,ithinkthewordsynthesisshouldbebetterinsteadofsinteringhere.second,thexrdpatternsdidntshowobviousdifferencebetweenthreesinteringtemperaturesof700,800and900?
c.
(作者老兄做工作太不仔细了,虫子们可别犯啊)
3.alsointhepagex,theauthormentionedthat:
xxx。
however,theauthordidntsupplythemorphologiesofparticlesatdifferentsynthesizingtemperatures.whataretheexperimentalresultsorthereferenceswhichsupporttheauthorsconclusionthatthexxxxpropertieswouldbeinfluencedbytheparticlesize?
(作者仍在瞎说,这个问题我也指出了,不光我还是看着国人的份上让修改,添加很多东西,说实话,文章看的很累很累)
4.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxhowever,tomyknowledge,afterthemilling,theparticlessizewillbedecreasedexactly,buthowandwhattodestroythehoststructure?
(虫子们自己注意)
5.xxxontheverticalaxisofthexrdpatternswasmeaningless,becauseauthoraddseveralpatternsinonefigure.itisobviousthatthesespectraarenotmeasuredbyordinarymethods.(都是老问题,不说了)
好东西
原文地址:
对英文审稿意见的回复作者:
海天奥博
一篇稿子从酝酿到成型历经艰辛,投出去之后又是漫长的等待,好容易收到编辑的回信,得到的往往又是审稿人不留情面的一顿狂批。
这时候,如何有策略有技巧的回复审稿人就显得尤为重要。
好的回复是文章被接收的重要砝码,而不恰当的回复轻则导致再次修改从而拖延发稿时间,重则导致文章被拒,前功尽弃。
下面把我平时总结的一些答复审稿人的策略和写回复信的格式和技巧跟大家交流一下。
【篇二:
英文审稿意见汇总】
◆ingeneral,thereisalackofexplanationofreplicatesandstatisticalme
thodsusedinthestudy.
◆furthermore,anexplanationofwhytheauthorsdidthesevariousexperiments
shouldbeprovided.
theconclusionsareoverstated.forexample,thestudydidnotshow
ifthesideeffectsfrominitialcopperburstcanbeavoidwiththepolymerformulation.
thereisnoexperimentalcomparisonofthealgorithmwithpreviouslyknownwork,soitisimpossibletojudgewhetherthealgorithmisanimprovementonpreviouswork.
mnqiseasierthantheprimitivepnqs,howtoprovethat.
◆inaddition,thelistofreferencesisnotinourstyle.itisclosebutnotcompletelycorrect.ihaveattachedapdffilewithinstructionsforauthorswhichshowsexamples.
◆beforesubmittingarevisionbesurethatyourmateri
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 英文 审稿 意见