GovernanceInSeaportClusters港口集群治理毕业论文外文文献翻译及原文Word文档下载推荐.docx
- 文档编号:17139665
- 上传时间:2022-11-28
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:10
- 大小:27.39KB
GovernanceInSeaportClusters港口集群治理毕业论文外文文献翻译及原文Word文档下载推荐.docx
《GovernanceInSeaportClusters港口集群治理毕业论文外文文献翻译及原文Word文档下载推荐.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《GovernanceInSeaportClusters港口集群治理毕业论文外文文献翻译及原文Word文档下载推荐.docx(10页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
文献、资料英文题目:
GovernanceInSeaportClusters
文献、资料来源:
文献、资料发表(出版)日期:
院(部):
专业:
班级:
姓名:
学号:
指导教师:
翻译日期:
2017.02.14
PeterW.deErlangen
1.Introduction
Apartfromwell-knownphysicalfactorssuchasthelocation,maritimeaccessibilityandhinterlandinfrastructure,thegovernanceofseaportsisanimportantdeterminantoftheirperformance.
Ananalysisofthegovernanceofseaportshasmostlybeenlimitedtotheroleoftheportauthority.Notwithstandingthecentralroleofportauthoritiesinports,wearguethatananalysisofgovernanceinseaportsrequiresattentionfortheroleof(private)firms.Institutionaleconomicliteratureoffersausefulframeworkforanalysingadvantagesanddisadvantagesofalternativegovernancemechanismsandprovidesabasisforanalysingtherolesofportauthorities.
InthispaperwedealwiththeissueofclustergovernanceinseaportsandillustrateourapproachwithananalysisoftheportofRotterdam..
First,webrieflydiscussthetheoreticalfoundationsoftheclustergovernanceconcept.Second,wediscusstheroleofportauthoritiesinthegovernanceofseaports.Third,wepresentempiricalresultsofasurveyamong43clusterexpertsinRotterdamonthegovernanceofRotterdam’sportcluster.Wefeminalitythepaperwithconclusions.
2.TheQualityOfClusterGovernance
Wedefineclustergovernanceas‘themixofandrelationsbetweenvariousmechanismsofcoordinationusedinacluster’.Thequalityofthegovernancediffersbetweenclusters.Thequalitydependsonthelevelofcoordinationcostsandthe‘scope’of‘coordinationbeyondprice’.Lowcoordinationcostsandmuchcoordinationbeyondpriceimprovethequalityofgovernance.
Whenthebenefitsofcoordinationaredistributedunequally,when(thethreatof)opportunisticbehaviourpreventscoordinationorwhenbenefitsofcoordinationareuncertain,coordinationbeyondpricedoesnotarisespontaneouslyorinstantaneously,evenwhenbenefitsofcoordinationexceedcosts.Thereforethereisingeneralashortageofcoordinationbeyondprice.Morecoordinationbeyondpriceimprovesthequalityofthegovernanceofclusters.
2.1Trust
Inclusterswheretheleveloftrustishigh,(average)transactioncostsarerelativelylow,becauseoflowcoststospecifycontractsandlowmonitoringcosts.Furthermore,costsofcoordinationbeyondpricearelowerandasaconsequence,morecoordinationbeyondpricewillarise.Theleveloftrustinaclusterisinfluencedbytheimportanceofreputationeffectsinacluster.Ifreputationeffectsarestrong,abusingtrusthasnegativeeffectsandthereforeacultureoftrustissustained.
2.2Intermediaries
Thepresenceofintermediarieslowerscoordinationcostsandexpandsthescopeofcoordinationbeyondprice,forthreerelatedreasons.First,theyprovidea‘bridgingtie’(WeevilyandZachery,1999)betweentwoormoreotherwisenotconnectedexchangepartners.Second,intermediariesreducecoordinationcostsbecausethey‘connectcognitions’.Intermediariescanbridgecognitivedifferencesbetweenfirmsthatoperateindifferentmarketenvironments.Thisroleofconnectingcognitionsisespeciallyimportantinclustersgiventhefactthatclustersarecharacterismbya‘cognitivedivisionofLimbourg’(BelusandTardigrada,2000).
2.3Leaderfirms
Leaderfirmsare‘strategicCentrewithsuperiorcoordinationskillsandtheabilitytosteerchange’(LorenzandBadenfuller,1995).Thebehaviourofleaderfirmsinfluencestheperformanceoftheclusterasawhole,becauseleaderfirmshaveboththeabilityandincentivetoinvestinthecompetitivenessofawholenetworkoffirms.Weidentifythreeinvestmentsofleaderfirmswithpositiveeffects(thesecanbetermed‘leaderfirmexternalities’)onotherfirmsinthecluster:
∙Internationalism;
∙innovation;
∙contributingtosolvingcollectiveactionproblems(Olson,1971)
Thus,leaderfirmscanenableorevenenforcecooperationandforthatreasonaddtotheperformanceofclusters.
2.4Collectiveactioninclusters
The‘problem’ofcollectiveaction(Olson,1971)isrelevantinclusters.Evenwhencollectivebenefitsofco-operationtoachievecollectivegoalsexceed(collective)costs,suchco-operationdoesnot(always)developspontaneously.DifferentCAP’s(CollectiveActionProblems),suchaseducationandtrainingandinnovationarerelevantinclusters.ForeachCAPagovernanceregimearises.Inthiscontext,aregimecanbedefinedasa‘relativelystablecollaborativeagreementthatprovidesactorswiththecapacitytoovercomecollectiveactionproblems’.
3.Portauthoritiesas‘clustermanagers’
Eventhoughavarietyofactorsplayaroleinthegovernanceofaseaportcluster,theportauthorityisthemostcentralactor.Theterm‘clustermanager’canbeusedtodescribetheroleoftheportauthority.Wediscusstheroleofaclustermanageringeneral,theinstitutionalpositionofportauthoritiesandsourcesofrevenueandinvestmentdecisionsofportauthorities.
3.1Theroleofa‘clustermanager’
A‘perfect’clustermanagerwouldbeangalvanizationwiththefollowingfourcharacteristics.
1.Aclustermanagerhasincentivestoinvestinthecluster,becauseitsrevenuesarerelatedtotheperformanceofthecluster.The‘perfect’clustermanagerwouldreceiveashareofthevalueaddedgeneratedintheclusterasrevenue,forinstancethrougha‘clustertax’.
2.Aclustermanagerinvestsinactivitieswithclusterbenefits(insteadoffirmspecificbenefits).Furthermore,theclustermanageraimstoinvestwhen‘clusterbenefits’exceedcosts.
3.Aclustermanageraimstodistributeinvestmentcostsforinvestmentstothosefirmsthatbenefit.Thisinvolvesco-financearrangementswithaspecificgroupofbeneficiaryfirms.
4.Aclustermanageroperatesself-sustaining:
overtimeinvestmentsequalrevenues.
Theportauthoritymatchesallfourcriteria:
theyhaveincentivesandresourcestoinvestinthecluster.Theportduesandleaserevenuesareresourcestoinvestintheportcluster.Furthermore,theygenerallyareself-sustainingandinvestintheperformanceoftheclusterasawhole.Portauthoritiesinvestinactivitieswithgeneralbenefits,suchasportexpansion,safetyanddredging.Giventheirinstitutionalposition,mostportauthoritiesarenotprofitdriven
Theportauthorityownsandexploitstheportareaandbenefitswhentheportclusterisanattractivelocationbecausetheycanleasemorelandandchargehigherprices.Furthermore,portauthoritiescollect‘portdues’.Thus,themoreshipscallaportthehighertheportdues.Forthesetworeasons,portauthoritieshaveaclearincentivetoinvestintheperformanceoftheportcluster.Thus,portauthoritiescanberegardedasclustermanagers.
3.2Revenuesofportauthorities
Theportauthorityhasvarioussourcesofrevenue.Theexistenceandrelativeimportanceofvariouschargesdiffersbetweenports(Asar,2001).Ingeneral,portauthoritiesgeneraterevenuefromthreesources:
∙chargestoshipowners/shipoperators;
∙chargestotenantsintheport,includingterminaloperators;
∙chargestocargo-owners.
Chargesforshipowners/shipoperatorsaretermed‘portdues’andinmostcasesrelatedtothesizeofvessels.Theseportduesarejustifiedbyinvestmentsindredging,safetysystems,andinvestmentsinportbasins.Chargesfortenantsareleasechargestofirmssuchasterminaloperatorsandwarehousingandproductionfirms.Chargesforcargoownersaretermedwharfageandaremostlyrelatedtocargovolumeortothevalueofgoods.Someportauthoritiesdonothavewharfagecharges,becausecargoownersindirectlypaybothotherchargesaswell.Insuchcases,apartofbothotherchargescanbeconceivedas‘pseudo-wharfage’.
Thisimpliesthattheportchargesdonothavetobefullyjustifiedonthebasisofinvestmentswithbenefitsforeithertenantsorshipowners.Investmentsforthebenefitofcargoowners,suchasinvestmentsinhinterlandinfrastructure,hinterlandaccessorwarehousingfacilities,canbejustifiedbecausethecargoownersasusersoftheportpaytheportcharges‘intheend’.Therefore,investmentswithbenefitsforthesecargoownersarejustified,evenifportchargesarepaidonlybytenantsandshippingfirms.
3.3Investmentdecisionsofportauthorities
Theportchargeshavetobejustifiedbyinvestmentsoftheportauthority.‘Investmentappraisal’–onthebasisofwhichcriteriadoportauthoritiesdecidetoinvest-isthereforeacentralissueforportauthorities.Weclaimthatthefollowingsimpleruleisaguidelineforinvestmentappraisalofportclustermanagers:
benefitsfortheclusterofaninvestmentshouldexceedcostsforthecluster.Clusterbenefitsarethesumofallbenefitsoffirmsinthecluster,clustercostsarethecostsofaninvestmentforfirmsinthecluster.Inmostcasescostsareincurredbecauseportchargesarerequiredforclusterinvestments.Sincecostsequalrevenues,ahighinvestmentlevelrequireshighportcharges.
4.ClustergovernanceintheportofRotterdam
InthissectionwepresentanempiricalcasestudyoftheportofRotterdam.Weinterviewed43portexpertsintheportofRotterdam.First,wedealwiththeimportanceofclustergovernancefortheperformanceofthecluster.Inthenextfourparagraphs,wediscusstheempiricalresultsforthefourvariablesthatinfluencethequalityoftheclustergovernance.Sixth,webrieflydiscusstheroleoftheportauthorityinRotterdamandendwithconclusions.
4.1TheimportanceofclustergovernanceinRotterdam’sseaportcluster
Theseresultss
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- GovernanceInSeaportClusters 港口 集群 治理 毕业论文 外文 文献 翻译 原文
链接地址:https://www.bdocx.com/doc/17139665.html