英文审稿意见汇总Word文件下载.docx
- 文档编号:16617730
- 上传时间:2022-11-24
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:20
- 大小:38.11KB
英文审稿意见汇总Word文件下载.docx
《英文审稿意见汇总Word文件下载.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《英文审稿意见汇总Word文件下载.docx(20页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
7、对研究问题的定义:
Trytosettheproblemdiscussedinthispaperinmoreclear,
writeonesectiontodefinetheproblem
8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literaturereview:
Thetopicisnovelbuttheapplicationproposedisnotsonovel.
9、对claim,如A>B的证明,verification:
Thereisnoexperimentalcomparisonofthealgorithmwithpreviouslyknownwork,soitisimpossibletojudgewhetherthealgorithmisanimprovementonpreviouswork.
10、严谨度问题:
MNQiseasierthantheprimitivePNQS,howtoprovethat.
11、格式(重视程度):
◆Inaddition,thelistofreferencesisnotinourstyle.Itisclosebutnotcompletelycorrect.Ihaveattachedapdffilewith"
InstructionsforAuthors"
whichshowsexamples.
◆Beforesubmittingarevisionbesurethatyourmaterialisproperlypreparedandformatted.Ifyouareunsure,pleaseconsulttheformattingnstructionstoauthorsthataregivenunderthe"
InstructionsandForms"
buttoninheupperright-handcornerofthescreen.
12、语言问题(出现最多的问题):
有关语言的审稿人意见:
◆ItisnotedthatyourmanuscriptneedscarefuleditingbysomeonewithexpertiseintechnicalEnglisheditingpayingparticularattentiontoEnglishgrammar,spelling,andsentencestructuresothatthegoalsandresultsofthestudyarecleartothereader.
◆Theauthorsmusthavetheirworkreviewedbyapropertranslation/reviewingservicebeforesubmission;
onlythencanaproperreviewbeperformed.Mostsentencescontaingrammaticaland/orspellingmistakesorarenotcompletesentences.
◆Aspresented,thewritingisnotacceptableforthejournal.Therearepro
blemswithsentencestructure,verbtense,andclauseconstruction.
◆TheEnglishofyourmanuscriptmustbeimprovedbeforeresubmission.Westr
onglysuggestthatyouobtainassistancefromacolleaguewhoiswell-versedi
nEnglishorwhosenativelanguageisEnglish.
◆PleasehavesomeonecompetentintheEnglishlanguageandthesubjectmatte
rofyourpapergooverthepaperandcorrectit.?
◆thequalityofEnglishneedsimproving.
来自编辑的鼓励:
Encouragementfromreviewers:
◆Iwouldbeverygladtore-reviewthepaperingreaterdepthonceithasbe
eneditedbecausethesubjectisinteresting.
◆Thereiscontinuedinterestinyourmanuscripttitled"
……"
whichyousubm
ittedtotheJournalofBiomedicalMaterialsResearch:
PartB-AppliedBiomat
erials.
◆TheSubmissionhasbeengreatlyimprovedandisworthyofpublication.
∙Thepaperisveryannoyingtoreadasitisriddledwithgrammaticalerrorsandpoorlyconstructedsentences.Furthermore,thenoveltyandmotivationoftheworkisnotwelljustified.Also,theexperimentalstudyisshallow.Infact,Icantfigureoutthelegendsasitistoosmall!
Howdoesyoureffortcompareswithstate-of-the-art?
∙Theexperimentisthemajorprobleminthepaper.Notonlythedatasetisnotpublished,butalsothedescriptionisveryrough.Itisimpossibletoreplicatetheexperimentandverifytheclaimoftheauthor.Furthermore,almostnodiscussionfortheexperimentalresultisgiven.E.g.whytheauthorwouldobtainthisresult?
Whichcomponentisthemostimportant?
Anyfurtherimprovement?
∙theauthorshouldconcentratedonthenewalgorithmwithyourideaandexplaineditsadvantagesclearlywithamostsimplewords.
∙itisgoodconcept,butneedtopolishlayout,language.
∙Theauthorsdidagoodjobinmotivatingtheproblemstudiedintheintroduction.Themathematicexplanationoftheproposedsolutionsisalsonice.Furthermore,thepaperisaccompaniedbyanadequatesetofexperimentsforevaluatingtheeffectivenessofthesolutionstheauthorspropose.
∙Apparently,Obviously,Innovation,refine,Inmyhumbleopinion
如果仍然有需要修改的小毛病,一般你可以用
youpaperhasbeenconditionallyaccepted.Pleaserevise.....accordingtoreviewcomments.
如果是接受,你可以用
Weareverypleasedtoinformyouthatyourpaper"
xxxxx"
hasbeenacceptedby[journalname].Pleaseprepareyourpaperbyjournaltemplate...............
Atafirstglance,thisshortmanuscriptseemsaninterestingpieceof
work,reportingon×
×
.Fine,goodquality,butallthishasbeendoneandpublished,andnearlybecomeawell-knownphenomenon.Therefore,thereisinsufficientnoveltyorsignificancetomeetpublicationcriteria.Also,Ididnotseeanyexpermentalevidencehowthe**isrelatedwith**,exceptforthehand-wavingqualitativediscussion.Therefore,IcannotsupportitspublicationinJPDinitspresentform.Itshouldberejected.
建议去小木虫问问,那里有一些资源。
thejournal'
scopyeditorsshouldnothavetofixthemanyremainingerrors.IsympathizethatChineselanguagesdonothaveanequivalentofEnglisharticles'
a,an,the'
anddon'
tseemtograspthematerialmeaningofthosewords.Theauthor'
sEnglishexpertdecidedtoinserttheword'
the'
infrontofmostmentionsof"
tip-tiltsystem."
Thisimpliesthatthereisonlyonesystemandtheauthorsareusingitexclusively.Therearedoznsofothermisuses.Pages2,3,8,9,10,11,and12arelitteredwiththem.Thepaperistodifficulttoreadinitspresentform.
感想:
一篇好的论文,从容到形式都需要精雕细琢。
附1:
中译审稿意见
审稿意见—1
(1)英文表达太差,尽管意思大致能表达清楚,但文法错误太多。
(2)文献综述较差,观点或论断应有文献支持。
(3)论文读起来像是XXX的广告,不知道作者与XXX是否没有关联。
(4)该模式的创新性并非如作者所述,目前有许多XX采取此模式(如美国地球物理学会),作者应详加调查并分析XXX运作模式的创新点。
(5)该模式也不是作者所说的那样成功……(审稿人结合论文中的数据具体分析)
审稿意见—2
(1)缺少直接相关的文献引用(如…)。
(2)写作质量达不到美国学术期刊的标准。
审稿意见—3
(1)作者应着重指出指出本人的贡献。
(2)缺少支持作者发现的方法学分析。
(3)需要采用表格和图件形式展示(数据)材料。
附2:
英文审稿意见(略有删节)
Reviewer:
1
Therearemanythingswrongwiththispaper.
TheEnglishisverybad.Althoughthemeaningisbyandlargeclear,nottoomanysentencesarecorrect.
Theliteraturereviewispoor.Thepaperisriddledwithassertionsandclaimsthatshouldbesupportedbyreferences.
ThepaperreadsasanadvertisementforXXX.ItisnotclearthattheauthorisindependentofXXX.
TheAAmodelofXXXisnotasinnovativeastheauthorclaims.TherearenowmanyXXthatfollowthismodel(AmericanGeophysicalUnion,forexample),andtheauthorshouldsurveythesemodeltoseewhichonefirstintroducedtheelementsoftheXXXmodel.
Themodelisalsonotassuccessfulastheauthorclaims.……
Overall,thepresentationandthecontentsofthepapercanonlymeanthatIrejectthatthepaperberejected.
2
Thearetwomajorproblemswiththispaper:
(1)Itismissingthecontextof(andcitationsto)whatisnowknowasthe"
two-sided"
marketliteratureincludingthatdirectlyrelatedto…(e.g.Braunstein,JASIS1977;
Economides&
Katsanakas,Mgt.Sci.,2006;
McCabe&
Snyder,B.E.JEconAnalysis,2007).
(2)ThewritingqualityisnotuptothestandardofaUSscholarlyjournal.
3
1.Theauthorshouldaccentuatehiscontributionsinthismanuscript.
2.Itlacksanalyticalmethodologiestosupportauthor’sdiscoveries.
3.Descriptionstylemateriallikethismanuscriptrequiresstructuredtables&
figuresforbetterpresentations.
Ms.Ref.No.:
******
Title:
******
MaterialsScienceandEngineering
DearDr.******,
Reviewershavenowcommentedonyourpaper.Youwillseethattheyareadvisingthatyoureviseyourmanuscript.Ifyouarepreparedtoundertaketheworkrequired,Iwouldbepleasedtoreconsidermydecision.
Foryourguidance,reviewers&
#39;
commentsareappendedbelow.
Reviewer#1:
Thisworkproposesanextensivereviewonmicromulsion-basedmethodsforthesynthesisofAgnanoparticles.Assuch,thematterisofinterest,howeverthepapersuffersfortwoseriouslimits:
1)
theoverallqualityoftheEnglishlanguageisratherpoor;
2)
someFiguresmustbeselectedfrompreviousliteraturetodiscussalsothesynthesisofanisotropicallyshapedAgnanoparticles(thereareseveralexamplespublished),whichhasbeenlargelyoverlookedthroughoutthepaper.;
Oncetheaboveconcernsarefullyaddressed,themanuscriptcouldbeacceptedforpublicationinthisjournal.
英文论文写作、投稿详解(整理各大学术论坛相关帖子,转帖)
目前科技论文作者向国际英文科技期刊投稿的方式有三种。
一是传统的邮寄形式,即通过国际快件将论文的原稿邮寄给刊物的主编或编辑部。
这种形式曾经是投稿的近乎唯一的方式,持续了漫长的岁月,可现在采用这种方式接受来稿的刊物越来越少了。
二是用电子的方式投稿,即作者将原稿的电子文件发至主编或编辑部的电子信箱。
这种投稿方式显然比邮寄快得多,但与邮寄一样,稿件也有丢失的时候。
目前采用这种纳稿方式的期刊还很多,但有很大一部分期刊己经在此基础上,又进了一步,发展到第三种也是目前最新的一种投稿方式,即网上投稿(ON-LINESUBMISSION)。
这种方式速度快,而且稿件不会丢失。
一旦作者在网上登记注册投稿,每个主要步骤都有记录,很受科技期刊作者的欢迎。
本文将就网上投稿过程及作者应该注意的地方予以详细的介绍,供对此感兴趣的中国作者参考。
网上投稿的关键是要做好充分的准备工作。
首先,作者对所要投稿的国际英文刊物的投稿需知(GUIDEFORAUTHORS)要了解清楚,并且按照要求准备好原稿的所有文件。
一般科技论文分为回顾性文章(REVIEWARTICLE),普通论文(REGULAR/RESEARCHARTICLE),快讯(SHORTCOMMUNICATIONS)等。
不同的文章类型,对原稿的格式要求也有所变化。
单就普通论文而言,文章从头到尾的基本格式是:
论文的开篇部分,包括文章标题(TITLE),作者(AUTHOR’SNAME)(注明通讯作者/CORRESPONDINGAUTHOR),作者单位地址(AFFILIATION),论文摘要(ABSTRACT),关键词(KEYWORDS)等;
论文的正文部分,包括介绍/引言(INTRODUCTION),实验方法(METHOD),实验材料(MATERIAL),结果与分析(RESULTSANDANALYSIS),讨论(DISCUSSION),结论(CONCLUSION)等;
需说明的是不同的学科,正文的容和形式会有所增减,图表、公式的数量也会有所不同。
正文后的结尾部分有的文章附加致辞(ACKNOWLEDGEMENT),有的则没有,但参考文献(REFERENCE)则是必须的。
有的文章还带有附录(APPENDIX),如全部的实验原始数据、计算机软件程序等。
现在有的刊物可以在网上发表的文章中附带电子视听文件(E-COMPONENTS)。
如短录像片(VIDEOCLIP),动画片(SH
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 英文 审稿 意见 汇总