国际贸易实务课堂案例Word文档格式.docx
- 文档编号:16022804
- 上传时间:2022-11-17
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:13
- 大小:26.63KB
国际贸易实务课堂案例Word文档格式.docx
《国际贸易实务课堂案例Word文档格式.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《国际贸易实务课堂案例Word文档格式.docx(13页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
was
concluded
in
United
States
America
on
terms
CIF
Kong.
During
execution
contract,
disputes
arose
between
seller
buyer
on
form
interpretation
contract.
In
such
case,
did
law
USA
or
of
Kong
apply
disputes?
Why?
案例二
2.Mr.
Anderson
intended
sell
plane
Johnson.
his
cable,
offered:
“Confirm
sale
plane…Please
send
5000
pounds
by
telegraphic
transfer.”
Johnson
cabled
back
immediately:
purchase
your
plane,
conditions
same
as
cable.
I’ve
sent
Account
Bank
who
keeps
money
behalf
until
delivery
plane.
Please
confirm
within
30
days
from
date
this
cable.”
Mr.
not
reply
another
at
much
higher
price.
Disagreements
occurred
two
parties
about
whether
contract
effectively.
a
concluded?
Three
案例三
3.
A
Chinese
export
company
July
1
offer
French
trading
stipulating
for
reach
them
before
10.
The
cabled
its
acceptance
the
8.
Because
delay
post
office,
Chinese
till
morning
11.And
receiving
acceptance,
informed
that
prices
said
products
were
rising
rapidly,the
refused
immediately.
Question:
Was
effective?
Four
案例四
4.
visited
buy
some
goods
morning.
When
offered
price,
he
didn’t
say
anything.
But
afternoon,
buyer
again
accepted
morning’s
offer.
At
moment,
found
price
international
market
rising,
so
how
could
company
deal
with?
Five
案例五
5.
Our
made
with
Italian
buyer,
which
is
valid
10th
month.
bureau’s
late
delivery,
we
have
received
11th.
this
price
these
How
can
do?
Six
案例六
6.
Company
farm
product
B
stating:
“Packing
sound
bags”.
Within
validity,
replied
“Refer
telex
first
accepted,
packing
new
bags”.On
reply,
began
export.
Days
later,
as
commodity
falling,
wrote
“No
is
entered
us,
you
failed
our
changing
requirement.”
Company
argued
B’s
effective
established
then.
1)
What
opinion?
2)
Give
reason
support
opinion
3)
prevent
dispute.
Seven
案例七
7.
1996,
certain
China
group
businessman
equipment.
New
York,
both
reached
oral
agreement
items
specifications,
unit
quantity.
Upon
leaving,
indicated
other
party
that,
when
they
go
Beijing,
would
draw
become
after
being
signed
parties.
After
going
clients
withdrew
their
import
equipment,
thus
L/C
not
opened
either.
US
side
urged
perform
contract;
otherwise
would
lodge
claim
US.
analyze
case
give
opinion
how
why?
Eight
案例八
June
living
Italy,
stipulating
11.
And
rapidly.
do
think
best
way
case?
Analysis:
案例分析
applies
because:
(a)
CIF
(b)
place
conclusion
USA;
(c)
place
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 国际贸易 实务 课堂 案例