Summary of Hedge and Modality Study文档格式.docx
- 文档编号:15718004
- 上传时间:2022-11-15
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:8
- 大小:40.75KB
Summary of Hedge and Modality Study文档格式.docx
《Summary of Hedge and Modality Study文档格式.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Summary of Hedge and Modality Study文档格式.docx(8页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
Vaguenessisoneoftheessentialfeaturesofnaturallanguagesandphenomenaoffuzzylanguageexisteverywhereinourdailylife.Whenpeoplecan’tmakesureofwhattheyaresaying,theyoftenemployvaguelanguagetoexpresstheiropinionsonsomeoccasions,andinthiswaytheycanmakethecommunicationcontinuesmoothly.Since20thcentury,researchersathomeandabroadhavemadewidespreadstudiesonvaguephenomenainlanguageuse,andhedges,asanimportantmemberofvaguelanguage,havealsobeenstudiedbroadly.
Thisarticleisasummaryofcurrentstudiesofhedgeandmodalitymainlyaboutthedefinitions,classificationsandpragmaticrealizationandfunctions.
.LiteratureReview
In1965,LoftiA.ZadehpublishedanarticleFuzzySets.Influencedbyhim,G.Lakofffirstintroducedthenotion“hedge”inhisfamousarticleHedges:
AStudyinMeaningCriteriaandtheLogicofFuzzyConcepts(1972:
195)tomean“wordswhosejobistomakethingsfuzzier(orlessfuzzy)”.Sincethen,theuseofhedgehasbeenstudiedbymanyotherresearchersasanimportantpragmaticphenomenonfromvariousperspectives.Thestudyshiftedtosociallinguistics,pragmatics,discourseanalysis,andtextanalysis.Hedgesmayintentionallyorunintentionallybeemployedinbothspokenandwrittenlanguagesincetheyarecruciallyimportantincommunication.Andhedgeshelpspeakersandwriterscommunicatemorepreciselythedegreeofaccuracyandtruthinassessments.Inreality,hedgesareusuallyconsideredasapragmaticstrategy.Inrecentyears,thestudyofhedgehasbeengreatlyenrichedinthecontentandtheory,andhedgesarealsousedindifferentfields,suchaspolitics,lawsandbusiness.
1.DefinitionofHedge
Differentresearchersstudyvaguenessinlanguageindifferentways,andnocongruentdefinitionhasbeenformulated.Thefollowingaresomedefinitionsfromdifferentresearchers.
ThenotionoflinguistichedgesisfirstintroducedbyG.Lakoffin1972.Hedefineshedgesasfollows,“Forme,someofthemostinterestingquestionsareraisedbythestudyofwordswhosemeaningimplicitlyinvolvesfuzziness—wordswhosejobistomakethingsfuzzierorlessfuzzy.Iwillrefertosuchwordsas‘hedges’”.Theyincludesuchexpressionsasvery,rather,moreorless,generally,inasense,alittleof,nearly,mostlyandsoon.Herearesomeotherexamples:
(1)John’sfeetweresortofblue.
(2)IthinkJohn’sfeetwereblue.
(3)I’mkindofgladthatIdidn’twin.
(4)Westayedthereforalmostaweek.
(5)Ithinkshehastheabilitytofulfillthetaskontime.
(6)Itissaidthatthesportmeetingwillbeheldsomedaynextmonth.
InaccordancewithLakoff’sconcern,however,BrownandLevinson(1987:
56)havelaterdefinedthetermofhedgesas“aparticle,wordorphrasethatmodifiesthedegreeofmembershipofapredicateoranounphraseinaset”.Thisdefinitionregardshedgesbothasdetensifiersandintensifiers.
DealingwithhedgesfromthepointofviewofteachingandlearningEnglishasasecondlanguage,Holmesdefineshedgesasdevicesforattenuatingthestrengthofutterance(1982a)andasapartofepistemicmodality(1982b,1984).
Wecanseethathedgescouldbeverbs,adjectives,adverbs,andsoon.Andallthesehedgesexpressmeaningsofunclearorfuzzy,buthedgescouldalsobedividedintoseveralcategories.
2.ClassificationofHedge
Manyscholarsstudyhedgesfromvariousperspectives,andtheymanagetodividehedgesindifferentways.PrinceandhiscolleaguesFraderandBoskstarttheresearchonhedgesfromLakoff’sdefinitionofhedgesasadevicethatmakesthingsfuzzyandclassifyhedgesintotwocategoriesfromtheperspectivesofsemanticsandpragmatics:
approximatorsandshields.Approximatorsaremainlysuchexpressionsaskindof,sortof,about,etc.whichactonmakingmeaningfuzzierorimprecise.Shieldscontainthosewordsorsentencepatternslikemight,perhaps,Ithink,etc.,whichhavesomeconnectionwithspeakers’assessmentofthetruthofthepropositionandindicatethatthespeakersarenotfullycommittedtothevalidityofthepropositiontheyareconveying.
2.1Approximators
Approximatorsarealwaysusedtoaffectthetruth,soastogivearangeorlimitthemeaningtoacertainscopeandtomaketheinterpretationclosertothefact.Approximatorsaffecttruthconditionsofproposition,includingexpressionssuchaskindof,alittlebit,about,andsoon.Approximatorscanbesubdividedintotwotypes.Oneisusuallyappliedwhenapropositionisalmostprecisebutnotfullycertainbythespeaker,suchaskindof,sortof,some,very,quite,almost,entirely,etc.,whicharenamedadaptors.Forexample:
(7)I’mkindofgladthatIdidn’twin.
(8)Westayedthereforalmostaweek.
(9)Hisfeetweresortofblue.
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- Summary of Hedge and Modality Study