案例分析和问答题优质PPT.ppt
- 文档编号:15610006
- 上传时间:2022-11-07
- 格式:PPT
- 页数:23
- 大小:277KB
案例分析和问答题优质PPT.ppt
《案例分析和问答题优质PPT.ppt》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《案例分析和问答题优质PPT.ppt(23页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
案例分析案例分析11.AsentoffertoBNovember25,2001,theGermanCompanyAsentanoffertotheHongKongCompanyBasthefollowing:
@#@2000Jettishcolorcopiersand$4,000eachFOB(Hamburg)forpromptshipment,theofferisvaliduntilDecember30.2.ArevoketheoffertoBAreceivedanofferfromacompanyofParistobuythistypeofcopiers,butofferedhigherpricethanCompanyAhadofferedtoCompanyB.SinceBhadnotmadeacommitmenttocompanyAsoffer,CompanyAsentthenoticetorevokethepreviousoffertoCompanyBonDec.15th.ThensignedacontractwiththecompanyinParis.3.BacceptAsofferHowever,onDec.22nd,CompanyAreceivedacommitmentfromCompanyBthatCompanyBagreedtotheconditionsofCompanyAsoffer.Subsequently,CompanyBopenedanirrevocableletterofcredittoCompanyAandrequiresCompanyAtofulfillthecontract.4.BrequirescompensationSinceCompanyAdidnotperformthecontractattheend,CompanyBresortedtotheSwedisharbitraltribunalandrequiredCompanyAscompensationforthelosses.5.AsargumentBut,CompanyAslawyersarguedthatCompanyAhadsentthenoticeofrevocationtotheCompanyBonDec.15th,sotheoffersentonNov.25thhadbeenrevokedandhadlostitseffectiveness.Inthisway,thecommitmentofCompanyBonDec.22ndwasnoteffectiveandthepurchaseandsalecontracthadnotbeenestablished.Questions1.IstherevocationofCompanyAeffective?
@#@2.IstheofferofCompanyAinNov.25thirrevocable?
@#@3.IsthecontractofCompanyAandCompanyBeffective?
@#@1.TherevocationofCompanyAisunreasonable.2.TheofferofCompanyAisirrevocable.3.ThecontractofCompanyAandCompanyBiseffective.AnswersReasons1.TherevocationofCompanyAisineffective.CompanyAthinksthathesendstherevocationtotheCompanyB,sotheofferisrevokedandineffective.HoweverUnderCISG15(P361)Anofferbecomeseffectivewhenitreachestheofferee.Whatsmore,therevocationofanoffershouldhappenbeforeanofferiseffective.2.TheofferofCompanyAisirrevocable.UndertheCISGArticle16,(P361)Anoffercannotberevokedundersuchcondition:
@#@Ifitindicates,whetherbystatingafixedtimeforacceptanceorotherwise,thatitisirrevocable.CompanyAmentionsthevalidtimeisbeforeDec.30andhereceivestheacceptancemadebyCompanyBinvalidtime.Theofferiseffectiveandisirrevocable.3.ThecontractofCompanyAandCompanyBiseffective.InthiscasetheofferofCompanyAindicatestheperiodofvalidityisDec.30in2001.TheacceptanceofCompanyBismadewithintheperiodofvalidity,sothecontractiseffective.ConclusionAnofferiseffectivewhenitreachestheofferee.Anoffercanbewithdrawnbeforetheoffereereceivestheoffer.Anoffercanberevocablebeforetheoffereeacceptstheoffer.Anofferisirrevocablewithinvalidtime.SuggestionWithdrawalandrevocationofanofferisverycomplexandweshouldrefertoCISGarticlestojudgeifandhowanoffercanberevocableorwithdrawal.WeshouldmakeacomprehensivestudyofCISGarticlesandapplytothesituationwhichwemaymeetinthefuture.案例分析2ThreeregisteredaccountantsZhang,WangandLisetupapublicaccountingfirmjointlywiththenameSpecialGeneralPartnership,supplyingtheservicesofauditingandcertificationofregisteredcapital.Duringtheauditingaffairsin2008,therehappenedthefollowingmatters:
@#@1)WhenZhangwasauditingAPublicCompanysaccountingreport,heleftoutpartofthesalesrevenueswithgrossnegligence.ThecourtheldthatthepublicaccountingfirmshouldberesponsibleforthelossofA.ButZhangthoughtthathedidntdothisonpurpose,thusallthepartnersshouldtakejointliabilityfortheloss.2)WhenWangwascertificatingtheregisteredcapitalofBcompany,hemadeamistakewithnegligence,andthusledtosomeeconomiclossesofthecreditorofBcompany.ThecourtheldthatWangsnegligencedidnotbelongtogrossnegligence.questionsAnswerthefollowingquestions:
@#@
(1)WasZhangsallegationright?
@#@Why?
@#@
(2)WhatshouldthepartnersdealwiththelossescausedbyWang?
@#@Pleasepresentyourreasons.Zhangsallegationwasnotright.Accordingtothepartnershiplaw,whenoneormoreofthepartnersactionleadstosomedebtsofthepartnershipdeliberatelyorwithgrossnegligence,theyshouldtakeunlimitedliabilityorunlimitedjointliability,andotherpartnerstakelimitedliabilityinaccordancewiththeirprofitproportioninthepartnership.Inthiscase,Zhangsactionwaswithgrossnegligence,sohewouldtakeunlimitedliability,andotherpartnerstooklimitedliability.
(2)TothelossescausedbyWang,allthepartnersshouldtakeunlimitedjointliabilities.Accordingtothepartnershiplaw,whenoneormoreofthepartnersactionleadstosomedebtsofthepartnershipnotdeliberatelyornotwithgrossnegligence,allthepartnersshouldtakeunlimitedjointliabilities.Inthiscase,Wangsactiondidnotbelongtogrossnegligence,soallthepartnersshouldtakeunlimitedliabilities.1.Inacorporation,whatrightsdoesoneshareholderhave?
@#@(vote,obtainthedivident,transfertheshares,sue,inspecton)2.Whatarethemajordutiesofprincipaltoagent?
@#@(paycommission,reimburseandindemnify,keepaccounds)3.Whatisthemirrorimagerule?
@#@(inmostcountriesisoneoftherequ
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 案例 分析 问答题