层次分析法模型外文文献翻译2014年译文2000字Word格式文档下载.docx
- 文档编号:12971365
- 上传时间:2022-10-01
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:7
- 大小:14.83KB
层次分析法模型外文文献翻译2014年译文2000字Word格式文档下载.docx
《层次分析法模型外文文献翻译2014年译文2000字Word格式文档下载.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《层次分析法模型外文文献翻译2014年译文2000字Word格式文档下载.docx(7页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
DERIVINGFURTHERBENEFITSOFANAHPMODEL[J].TheWorldInsight,2014,22(4):
201-220.
(声明:
本译文归百度文库所有,完整译文请到百度文库。
)
原文
THEANALYSISOFTHEPROCESSINDERIVINGFURTHERBENEFITSOFANAHPMODEL
IshizakaA,LabibA.
ABSTRACT
ThispaperdealswithevaluationofbenefitsfromtheAHPmethodologythatcanimprovethequalityofthedecisionmakingprocess.Inthisresearcheffort,evaluation(givesecondopinions)ofanother’sassessmentofgoaliscarriedout,wherein,thecriteriaassessmentisdifferentwhilekeepingthealternativesassessmentwithrespecttoeachcriteriaconstant,totestifthepriorityvectorofthealternativesissameordifferent.
Keywords:
AHPprocess,subjectivity,pair-wiseassessments.
1.Introduction
Makingdecisionsinvolveevaluatingtheavailablealternativesandchoosingtherightonethatmeetsadesiredobjective.Underlyingassumptionisourabilitytocompare,andmeasureorassessthevalueofthesealternativeswiththerespecttothegoalathand.Itisoneofmainfunctionsandresponsibilitiesofseniormanagementinorganizations.Decision-makingisafundamentalprocessthatisintegralineverythingwedo(Saaty,2004).Itisnotsurprisingtoknowthatoneofthemaingoalsofeducationistohelpstudents/participantsinthestudytomakebetterdecisionsandincreaseobjectivityinmakingsuchdecisions.However,subjectivitycannotbecompletelyeliminatedbecauseweinterpretandmakeinferencesbasedonobjectiveassessmentsofthedata.
AnalyticalHierarchyProcess,adecision-makingmethodologydevelopedbySaaty(1987)isanattemptinthisdirection.AHPcanbeusedinanysituationwherethepresenceofmultipleinfluencingfactorsanddecisioncriteriamakeitdifficulttounderstandtheinteractionsamongthemintuitively.InsuchcasesAHPoffersastructuredapproachtoreducethecomplexityandhelpusinmakingadecisionobjectively.
Saaty(2004)arguesthatsubjectivejudgmentsusingqualitativeparametersarenotnecessarilyinferiortophysicalquantitativemeasures.Hecontendsthatphysicalscalemeasurementsonlyhelpininterpretationandinourunderstandinganduseofthethingsthatwealreadyknowhowtomeasure.
Although,AHPispracticedinindustryandacademics,itpresentsafewconcernsandopportunitiesforfurtherresearch.Oneoftheconcernsisthatsubjectivity.Althoughsubjectivitycannotbeeliminatedcompletely,withbetteranalysis,objectivitycanbeimproved.Inthispaper,usingtheAHPmethodology,weproposetoevaluateorprovidesecondopinionofanotherperson’sassessmentofagoaltoimproveobjectivity.Withthisapproach,thesecondopinionofthecriteriaassessmentisdifferentwhilekeepingthealternativesassessmentwithrespecttoeachcriteriathesameandtestifthepriorityvectorofthealternativesissameordifferent.
Theremainderofthepaperpresentsabriefliteraturereviewabouttheanalyticalhierarchyprocessfollowedbyhypothesisofthestudyandresearchdesign.Followingthese,wepresentdatapresentationandanalysis.Weconcludethepaperwithlimitationsandfuturescope.
2.LiteratureReview
TheprimaryobjectiveofAHPistoclassifyanumberofalternativesbyconsideringagivensetofqualitativeandquantitativecriteriaandusingpair-wisecomparisons/judgments.AHPresultsinahierarchicallevelingofthequalitydeterminants,wheretheupperhierarchylevelisthegoalofthedecisionprocess,thenextleveldefinestheselectioncriteriawhichcanbefurthersubdividedintosubcriteriaatlowerhierarchylevelsand,finally,thebottomlevelpresentsthealternativedecisions.
AnalyticHierarchyProcess(AHP)isoneofthemulti-criteriadecision makingmethodsthatwasoriginallydevelopedbySaaty(1987).Itisamethodtoderiveratioscalesfrompairedcomparisonstodeterminerelativeweightsandusethemforevaluatingalternatives.Theinputcanbeobtainedfromactualmeasurementsuchaspriceandweightorfromsubjectiveopinionsuchassatisfactionfeelingsandpreference.AHPhasaprovisionforasmallinconsistency(10%)injudgmentbecauseitisdifficulttobeabsolutelyconsistent.Theratioscalesarederivedfromtheprincipaleigenvectorsandtheconsistencyindexisderivedfromtheprincipaleigenvectorvalue(Saaty,2008).
ItiswellknownthatAHPisassociatedwithlargecomputingandsubjectivity(Rang-guo&
Yan-ni,2004).Inanefforttoimprovequalityofdecisions,Stern,Meherez,andHadad(2000)suggestedahybridapproachofusingdataenvelopmentanalysis(DEA)andAHPtotakebestofbothandavoidpitfallsofeachmethod.ThePeters-Zelewski(2008)paperlooksatadiscussionofthepitfallsofAHPfromunderstandingdifferencesbetweenrelativeversusabsolutemeasurements,clusteringofdirectmeasurements,andintegratedviewofinputsandou
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 层次 分析 模型 外文 文献 翻译 2014 译文 2000