修辞学与心理学结合的论文重点.docx
- 文档编号:12334844
- 上传时间:2023-04-18
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:19
- 大小:29.61KB
修辞学与心理学结合的论文重点.docx
《修辞学与心理学结合的论文重点.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《修辞学与心理学结合的论文重点.docx(19页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
修辞学与心理学结合的论文重点
本论文重点将华盛顿欧文和他的作品结合,论述修辞的特点和心理学的结合
1.Introduction
Vividlanguagecanarousetheaudience‟sinterest,holdtheirattentionandenhancetheircomprehensionwithimaginaryandleavetheaudiencewithafreshimpression.Toincreasetheimpactoflanguage,figuresofspeechareemployedinbothliteraryandnon-literary,bothwrittenandspokenforms.Theyareusedtoembellish,emphasizeorclarifyexpressions,tomakelanguagemorecolorful,moreforceful,ormoreexplicit,andthusmakingcommunicationsmoreefficientandeffective(Zhang88.TherearevariousfiguresofspeechinWashingtonIrving‟snovel“theLegendofSleepyHollow”.ItisofgreathelptounderstandWashingtonIrving‟swritingstyleandthethemeofthenovelbystudyingthefiguresofspeechcombinedwithpsychologicalmechanismofrhetoricaltextstructure.
1.1WashingtonIrvingandhisworkthelegendofsleepyhollow
(1ABriefIntroductionofWashingtonIrving
WashingtonIrvingisoneoftheearliestromanticwritersinAmerica.Knownforhissketches,shortstoriesandbiographies,IrvingwasthefirstAmericanwriterwhohasattainedinternationalreputation(Gao,2006:
15.AbsorbingthecreamofEuropeancultureandliterature,Irvingcreatedhisuniquestylethatisfresh,natural,humorousandmusical.Withhisshortstoriesandsuccessinmanyotherfields,IrvinghasmadegreatcontributionstothedevelopmentofindependentAmericanliterature.AccordingtoZhuXiaoning,“ItisIrvingwhoactivatedthepotentialofAmericanliteratureandlaidsolidfoundationsforitsfuturedevelopment.”(66-68.Irvinghelpstodiscover“realAmerica”andhecaricaturestheridiculousaspectsofAmericanlife:
materialism,complacencyandsmugnesswithhisremarkablesatiricalessays.RipVanWinkleandTheLegendofSleepyHollowcollectedinTheSketchBook(1819-1820,thesustainedandmorematuresatire,areundoubtedlythemoststrikingones.Besides,Irving‟sstylecanbedescribedasbeautiful.Hewaswritingalwaysforpleasure,andtoproducepleasure(Wu,1990:
60.Itisimitative,itistrue,hewrotetoamuseandentertain,andheisgoodatenvelopinghisstoriesinanatmosphere,therichnessofwhichisoftenmorethancompensationfortheslimnessofplot.Hischaractersarevividandtruesothattheytendtolingerinthemindofthereader(Chang,2003:
47.
(2ABriefIntroductionof“TheLegendofSleepyHollow”
Thestoryissetin1790intheDutchsettlementofTarryTown,inasecludedglencalledSleepyHollow.IttellsthestoryofIchabodCrane,asycophantic,lean,lanky,andextremelysuperstitiousschoolmasterfromConnecticut,whocompeteswithAbraham"BromBones"VanBrunt,thetownrowdy,forthehandof18-year-oldKatrinaVanTassel,thedaughterandsolechildofawealthyfarmer,BaltusVanTassel.AsCraneleavesapartyheattendedattheVanTasselhomeonanautumnnight,heispursuedbyHeadlessHorseman,whoissupposedlytheghostofaHessiantrooperwhohadhisheadshotoffbyastraycannonballduring"somenamelessbattle"oftheAmericanRevolutionaryWar,andwho"ridesforthtothesceneofbattleinnightlyquestofhishead".Ichabodmysteriouslydisappearsfromtown,leavingKatrinatomarryBromBones,whowas"tolookexceedinglyknowingwheneverthestoryofIchabodwasrelated".AlthoughthenatureoftheHeadlessHorsemanisleftopentointerpretation,thestoryimpliesthattheHorsemanwasreallyBromBonesindisguise.
Inthisstory,Irvingdescribesideallifeinthecountryside,andthevillagersareconsideredhonest,kindinextremelyrichpoeticlanguages.Thestoryalsomadeaveiledcriticismofthesocialreality:
quietcountryiscomparedwiththenoisycities;thesimple-heartedearlyimmigrantsarecomparedwiththehumbledanddirtybourgeois.Theemploymentoffiguresofspeechcontributestoachieverhetoricaleffectsandhelpsreadersunderstandthenovel‟sthemeandIrving‟swritingstyle.
1.2Explanationaboutrhetoric
(1Thetwobasicprinciplesofpsychologicalmechanism
Theconstructionofrhetoricisinordertoreachabetterresultinlanguageexpression.Therearetwobasicrhetorictextconstructionprinciples:
theprincipleofavailabilityandeffectiveness.Availabilityrefersthattherhetoricaltextshouldbeacceptedorunderstoodeasilybyrecipients,thatis,therhetoricshouldaccordtorecipients‟leveloftheknowledgebaseandmentalstate.Validityrefersthattextshouldbeabletounderstandandrhetoricreceptorsandbewillingtoaccept.Itcannotmakerecipientsfeelobscure.Thetwobasicprinciplesaffecteachother(吴礼权,2002:
42.
(2Rhetoricaltextstructureandpsychologicalmechanism
Thispaperdemonstratestheeffectsoffiguresofspeechfromthreeaspects:
Rhetoricaltextstructureandimagination:
imaginationisacommonpsychologicalphenomenon.Whenthetextisstructuredbylanguages,itneedsfiguresofspeech,suchassimile,metaphor,visionandparody,toexpressthetextmoreclearlyandvividly,and
thesefiguresofspeecharebasedonimagination.(吴礼权,2002:
55.
Rhetoricaltextstructureandthestrengthenedattention:
attentionistheactionofapplyingone‟smindtosomething.Hyperbole,repetition,parenthesisandironyarebasedonthiskindofpsychologicalmechanism.
Rhetoricaltextstructureandempathy:
personification,transferredepithetarebasedonempathy.Empathymakesreadersunderstandtheplotorpsychologicalcharactersbysharingthesameemotionandexperiencefromthenovel.
(3Figuresofspeech
Therearelotsoffiguresofspeechinthisnovel,suchassimile,metaphor,personification,hyperbole,vision,onomatopoeiaandsoon.Figuresofspeecharewaysofmakingourlanguagefigurative.Whenweusewordsinotherthantheirordinaryorliteralsensetolendforcetoanidea,toheighteneffect,ortocreatesuggestiveimaginary,wearesaidtobespeakingorwritingfiguratively.Whenweusewordsinotherthantheirordinaryorliteralsensetolendforcetoanidea,toheighteneffect,ortocreatesuggestiveimagery,wearesaidtobespeakingorwritingfiguratively.(http:
//en.wikipedia.org.Figuresofspeechaimatincreasingvividnessoflanguage.Vividlanguagecanarousetheaudience‟sinterest,holdtheirattentionandenhancetheircomprehensionwithimageryandleavetheaudiencewithafreshimpression.Literatureisunequivocallyaformofpersuasivediscoursegovernedbyrhetoric.Throughrhetoric,thetextisequaltolinguisticpersuasion,andtheauthorcanexpressmoreconvincing.Irvingwasgoodatwritingdescriptiveessays,especiallyusingfiguresofspeech.WashingtonIrving‟sstylecanbedescribedasbeautiful.Itisimitative.Itistrue,buthewasahighlyskillfulwriter.Nevershockingandabitsentimentalattimes,hismannerseemsmoreimportantthanhismatter.Astothestyleofthepiece,itrepresentsIrvingathisbest.
2.Literaturereview
Therearelargequantitiesofstudieson“theLegendofSleepyHollow”.Thefollowingaretheusefulliteraturesforthispaper.
CuiDeminexplainedthatIrvinghaddescribedtheprotagonistwithrichpsychologicalchangesinhispaperCommentsonIchabodCranein“theLegendofSleepyHollow”;GaoQingxuanwrotethethesisOriginalCharactersintheLegendofSleepyHollow.Heanalyzedthewritingskillsandthemaincharactersinthenovelonthebaseofsocialbackground.HestrengthenedthatIrvinghadfoundinformationfromEuropeforwritingthisnovel;TongZhaoshengdiscussedtheprotagonist‟simagethroughappearance,actionandpsychology.Andfromtheanalysis,heconcludedthatthe
protagonistisgreedy,timidandhypocritical.AnotheroneisZhangNanaanalyzedthenovelfromtheaspectofwritingskills,andconcludedthatthisnoveltookanimportantpartintheliteraryhistoryofAmerica.
Fromwhathasbeenmentionedabove,mostworksfocusontheprotagonist‟scharacters.Theystudiedthemaincharactersandgotinformationaboutthewritingstyleandthethemeofthenovel.Inmypaper,thereissomethingincommonwiththeirs:
westudythenovel“theLegendofSleepyHollow”,themaincharacter,thethemeandthewritingstyle.Whatismore,thispaperwillmakeadifference.ItwilldiscussIrving‟swritingstyleandthethemeofthenovelbyanalyzingeffectsoffiguresofspeechcombinedwiththepsychologicalmechanismofrhetoric.
3.Rhetoricalanalysisofthelegendofsleepyhollowfrompsychologicalmechanism
ThefollowingfiguresofspeechplayanimportantroleinWashingtonIrving‟snovel.
3.1Simileandmetaphor
Inrhetoric,simileisafigureofspeechbywhichtwoconceptsortwodissimilarthingsareimaginativelyanddescriptivelycomparedbecausetheyhaveatleastonequalityorcharacteristicincommonorinresemblance(Zhang,2005:
158.
Metaphoruseswordstoindicatesomethingdifferentfromtheirliteralmeaning---onethingisdescribedintermsofanothersoastosuggestalikenessoranalogybetweenthem.(Zhang,2005:
161Bothsimileandmetaphorsharequiteafewcommonqualitiesthatbelongtoakindofrhetoricaltextmode,whichisthepsychologicalmechanismbasedonassociations.Theconstructionoftherhetoricisreferredthattheproducerassociatesthingstogethertoenrichthedepictedcontent‟svitality,vividness,noveltyandextensionductility,whichcontributestothedeepunderstandingofconnotation.Meanwhile,thereceiverusesreengineeringimaginationtorediscoverinformationthattheauthorreallywantstoshow,thentoacquireakindofinterpretationofjoyandaestheticappeal(吴,2001:
3.
Metaphorandsimilebegintoruninthispremisewhenontologyisactedastheobjectiveexistence,whichstimulatethecreator'ssense,withitsbrightvividimageintothebrain,andwiththeoriginalcreatorstoredinthehe
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 修辞学 心理学 结合 论文 重点