哈佛大学公开课《公正该如何做是好》第三课英文字幕.docx
- 文档编号:11354343
- 上传时间:2023-02-28
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:111
- 大小:43.46KB
哈佛大学公开课《公正该如何做是好》第三课英文字幕.docx
《哈佛大学公开课《公正该如何做是好》第三课英文字幕.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《哈佛大学公开课《公正该如何做是好》第三课英文字幕.docx(111页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
哈佛大学公开课《公正该如何做是好》第三课英文字幕
1
00:
00:
30,180-->00:
00:
31,910
Whenwefinishedlasttime,
2
00:
00:
36,000-->00:
00:
37,780
wewerelookingat
JohnStuartMill's
3
00:
00:
38,510-->00:
00:
47,320
attempttoreplytothecritics
ofBentham'sUtilitarianism.
4
00:
00:
48,300-->00:
00:
54,310
InhisbookUtilitarianismMill
triestoshowthatcritics
5
00:
00:
54,419-->00:
01:
00,350
tothecontraryitispossible
withintheutilitarianframework
6
00:
01:
00,610-->00:
01:
03,930
todistinguishbetween
higherandlowerpleasures.
7
00:
01:
04,030-->00:
01:
08,680
Itispossibletomakequalitative
distinctionsofworthandwetested
8
00:
01:
08,780-->00:
01:
15,080
thatideawiththeSimpsons
andtheShakespeareexcerpts.
9
00:
01:
15,920-->00:
01:
21,490
Andtheresultsofourexperiment
seemtocallintoquestion
10
00:
01:
24,899-->00:
01:
32,820
Mill'sdistinctionbecauseagreat
manyofyoureportedthatyouprefer
11
00:
01:
33,030-->00:
01:
37,190
theSimpsonsbutthatyou
stillconsiderShakespearetobe
12
00:
01:
37,390-->00:
01:
42,120
thehigherorthe
worthierpleasure.
13
00:
01:
42,670-->00:
01:
48,160
That'sthedilemmawithwhich
ourexperimentconfrontsMill.
14
00:
01:
48,800-->00:
01:
54,060
WhataboutMill'sattempttoaccount
fortheespeciallyweightycharacter
15
00:
01:
54,289-->00:
01:
58,730
ofindividualrightsandjustice
inchapterfiveofUtilitarianism.
16
00:
01:
59,669-->00:
02:
07,380
Hewantstosaythatindividualrights
areworthyofspecialrespect.
17
00:
02:
08,400-->00:
02:
10,570
Infact,hegoessofaras
tosaythatjusticeis
18
00:
02:
10,900-->00:
02:
15,080
themostsacredpartandthe
mostincomparablybindingpart
19
00:
02:
15,269-->00:
02:
16,480
ofmorality.
20
00:
02:
17,150-->00:
02:
23,320
Butthesamechallengecouldbe
puttothispartofMill'sdefense.
21
00:
02:
24,459-->00:
02:
32,690
Whyisjusticethechiefpartand
themostbindingpartofourmorality?
22
00:
02:
32,870-->00:
02:
35,200
Well,hesaysbecause
inthelongrun,
23
00:
02:
36,090-->00:
02:
38,860
ifwedojusticeand
ifwerespectrights,
24
00:
02:
39,609-->00:
02:
43,220
societyasawholewillbe
betteroffinthelongrun.
25
00:
02:
44,519-->00:
02:
46,480
Well,whataboutthat?
26
00:
02:
49,590-->00:
02:
52,050
Whatifwehaveacasewhere
makinganexceptionand
27
00:
02:
52,280-->00:
02:
56,330
violatingindividualrights
actuallywillmakepeoplebetteroff
28
00:
02:
56,560-->00:
02:
57,170
inthelongrun?
29
00:
02:
57,350-->00:
03:
00,310
Isitallrightthen
tousepeople?
30
00:
03:
00,980-->00:
03:
04,120
Andthereisafurtherobjection
thatcouldberaised
31
00:
03:
04,220-->00:
03:
07,460
againstMill'scasefor
justiceandrights.
32
00:
03:
07,560-->00:
03:
10,570
Supposetheutilitarian
calculusinthelongrun
33
00:
03:
10,829-->00:
03:
16,010
worksoutashesaysitwillsuch
thatrespectingpeople'srights
34
00:
03:
17,780-->00:
03:
21,550
isawayofmakingeverybody
betteroffinthelongrun.
35
00:
03:
21,700-->00:
03:
24,420
Isthattherightreason?
36
00:
03:
24,570-->00:
03:
28,130
Isthattheonlyreason
torespectpeople?
37
00:
03:
29,450-->00:
03:
32,480
Ifthedoctorgoesinand
yankstheorgansfrom
38
00:
03:
32,590-->00:
03:
34,970
thehealthypatientwho
cameinforacheckup
39
00:
03:
35,149-->00:
03:
37,010
tosavefivelives,
40
00:
03:
38,179-->00:
03:
41,240
therewouldbeadverse
effectsinthelongrun.
41
00:
03:
41,570-->00:
03:
44,470
Eventually,peoplewould
learnaboutthisand
42
00:
03:
44,679-->00:
03:
46,910
wouldstopgoing
inforcheckups.
43
00:
03:
47,369-->00:
03:
49,130
Isittherightreason?
44
00:
03:
50,480-->00:
03:
54,430
Istheonlyreasonthatyouasa
doctorwon'tyanktheorgans
45
00:
03:
54,660-->00:
03:
59,030
outofthehealthypatient
thatyouthink,well,
46
00:
03:
59,260-->00:
04:
05,850
ifIusehiminthisway,inthe
longrunmoreliveswouldbelost?
47
00:
04:
07,280-->00:
04:
10,520
Oristhereanotherreason
havingtodowithintrinsicrespect
48
00:
04:
10,780-->00:
04:
13,030
forthepersonas
anindividual?
49
00:
04:
13,420-->00:
04:
17,730
Andifthatreasonmatters
andit'snotsoclear
50
00:
04:
17,830-->00:
04:
22,430
thatevenMill'sutilitarianism
cantakeaccountofit,
51
00:
04:
24,570-->00:
04:
29,150
fullytoexaminethesetwo
worriesorobjections,
52
00:
04:
30,420-->00:
04:
35,230
toMill'sdefensewe
needtopushfurther.
53
00:
04:
36,590-->00:
04:
41,430
Andweneedtoaskinthecase
ofhigherorworthierpleasures
54
00:
04:
42,909-->00:
04:
47,880
aretheretheoriesofthegood
lifethatcanprovide
55
00:
04:
48,110-->00:
04:
53,550
independentmoralstandards
fortheworthofpleasure?
56
00:
04:
54,919-->00:
04:
58,220
Ifso,whatdotheylooklike?
That'sonequestion.
57
00:
04:
59,440-->00:
05:
04,120
Inthecaseofjusticeandrights,
ifwesuspectthatMill
58
00:
05:
04,330-->00:
05:
07,340
isimplicitlyleaningon
notionsofhumandignity
59
00:
05:
07,460-->00:
05:
12,850
orrespectforpersonthatare
notstrictlyspeakingutilitarian,
60
00:
05:
13,710-->00:
05:
16,720
weneedtolooktoseewhether
therearesomestrongertheories
61
00:
05:
16,890-->00:
05:
22,980
ofrightsthatcanexplainthe
intuitionwhichevenMillshares,
62
00:
05:
23,400-->00:
05:
26,750
theintuitionthatthereason
forrespectingindividuals
63
00:
05:
26,849-->00:
05:
34,950
andnotusingthemgoesbeyond
evenutilityinthelongrun.
64
00:
05:
37,820-->00:
05:
43,360
Today,weturntooneofthose
strongtheoriesofrights.
65
00:
05:
44,609-->00:
05:
49,710
Strongtheoriesofrightsay
individualsmatternotjustas
66
00:
05:
49,859-->00:
05:
53,570
instrumentstobeusedfor
alargersocialpurpose
67
00:
05:
56,080-->00:
05:
58,360
orforthesakeof
maximizingutility,
68
00:
05:
59,190-->00:
06:
05,180
individualsareseparatebeings
withseparatelivesworthyofrespect.
69
00:
06:
07,000-->00:
06:
10,010
Andsoit'samistake,
accordingtostrongtheories
70
00:
06:
10,210-->00:
06:
14,710
orrights,it'samistake
tothinkaboutjustice
71
00:
06:
14,810-->00:
06:
21,660
orlawbyjustaddingup
preferencesandvalues.
72
00:
06:
22,169-->00:
06:
25,470
Thestrongrightstheory
weturntotodayis
73
00:
06:
25,570-->00:
06:
27,510
libertarianism.
74
00:
06:
28,260-->00:
06:
32,580
Libertarianismtakes
individualrightsseriously.
75
00:
06:
33,799-->00:
06:
35,550
It'scalledlibertarianism
becauseitsays
76
00:
06:
35,840-->00:
06:
39,920
thefundamentalindividual
rightistherighttoliberty
77
00:
06:
42,520-->00:
06:
46,890
preciselybecauseweare
separateindividualbeings.
78
00:
06:
48,659-->00:
06:
53,470
We'renotavailableto
anyusethatthesociety
79
00:
06:
53,700-->00:
06:
57,180
mightdesireordevise
preciselybecauseweare
80
00:
06:
57,280-->00:
07:
00,210
individualseparate
humanbeings.
81
00:
07:
01,570-->00:
07:
04,240
Wehaveafundamental
righttoliberty,
82
00:
07:
04,490-->00:
07:
10,290
andthatmeansaright
tochoosefreely,
83
00:
07:
10,760-->00:
07:
12,930
toliveourlives
asweplease
84
00:
07:
13,159-->00:
07:
16,930
providedwerespectother
people'srightstodothesame.
85
00:
07:
17,630-->00:
07:
19,700
That'sthefundamentalidea.
86
00:
07:
20,739-->00:
07:
24,120
RobertNozick,oneofthe
libertarianphilosophers
87
00:
07:
24,320-->00:
07:
28,820
wereadforthiscourse,
putsitthisway:
88
00:
07:
29,620-->00:
07:
31,220
Individualshaverights.
89
00:
07:
31,479-->00:
07:
35,040
Sostrongandfarreaching
aretheserightsthatthey
90
00:
07:
35,130-->00:
07:
39,550
raisethequestionofwhat,
ifanything,thestatemaydo.
91
00:
07:
44,010-->00:
07:
49,580
Sowhatdoeslibertarianism
sayabouttheroleofgovernment
92
00:
07:
50,180-->00:
07:
51,750
orofthestate?
93
00:
07:
52,190-->00:
07:
56,300
Well,therearethreethings
thatmostmodernstatesdo
94
00:
07:
58,299-->00:
08:
02,140
thatonthelibertarian
theoryofrightsare
95
00:
08:
02,400-->00:
08:
05,640
illegitimateorunjust.
96
00:
08:
06,609-->00:
08:
10,090
Oneofthemis
paternalistlegislation.
97
00:
08:
10,340-->00:
08:
13,950
That'spassinglawsthat
protectpeoplefromthemselves,
98
00:
08:
14,370-->00:
08:
18,030
seatbeltlaws,forexample,
ormotorcyclehelmetlaws.
99
00:
08:
19,070-->00:
08:
22,080
Thelibertariansaysit
maybeagoodthing
100
00:
08:
22,179-->00:
08:
24,350
ifpeoplewearseatbelts
101
00:
08:
24,870-->00:
08:
28,710
butthatshouldbeupto
themandthestate,
102
00:
08:
28,969-->00:
08:
32,210
thegovernment,hasno
businesscoercingthem,
103
00:
08:
32,990-->00:
08:
38,060
us,towearseatbelts
bylaw.
104
00:
08:
39,030-->00:
08:
44,780
It'scoercion,sonopaternalist
legislation,numberone.
105
00:
08:
45,040-->00:
08:
48,310
Numbertwo,no
moralslegislation.
106
00:
08:
48,980-->00:
08:
54,500
Manylawstrytopromote
thevirtueofcitizens
107
00:
08:
54,600-->00:
09:
02,260
ortrytogiveexpressiontothe
moralvaluesofthesocietyasawhole.
108
00:
09:
03,610-->00:
09:
08,600
Libertariansaythat'salsoa
violationoftherighttoliberty.
109
00:
09:
10,840-->00:
09:
14,000
Taketheexampleof,well,
aclassicexample
110
00:
09:
14,240-->00:
09:
17,300
oflegislationauthoredinthe
nameofpromotingmorality
111
00:
09:
17,400-->00:
09:
22,790
traditionallyhavebeenlawsthat
preventsexualintimacy
112
00:
09:
22,910-->00:
09:
26,730
betweengaysandlesbians.
113
00:
09:
27,670-->00:
09:
31,180
Thelibertariansaysnobody
elseisharmed,
114
00:
09:
31,319-->00:
09:
33,420
nobodyelse'srights
areviolated,
115
00:
09:
33,880-->00:
09:
38,610
sothestateshouldgetout
ofthebusinessentirelyof
116
00:
09:
38,850-->00:
09:
42,460
tryingtopromotevirtueor
toenact
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 公正该如何做是好 哈佛大学 公开 公正 如何 做是好 第三 英文 字幕
